Journals / Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

DIGITAL LEADERSHIP: A SCALE ADAPTATION STUDY

DİJİTAL LİDERLİK: BİR ÖLÇEK UYARLAMA ÇALIŞMASI

Pages
1038–1050
Publication Date
2022-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal that the digital leadership scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool that could be used in research to be conducted in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The digital leadership scale was developed by Zeike, Bradbury, Lindert, and Pfaff (2019) since there is no scale suitable for the digital leadership skills of managers and whose validity has been proven.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is aimed to adapt the digital leadership scale, which was developed for empirical studies on digital leadership in Turkey, into Turkish, and to conduct validity and reliability studies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal that the digital leadership scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool that could be used in research to be conducted in Turkey.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Dijital Liderlik · Geçerlik · Güvenirlik

Abstract

The digital leadership scale was developed by Zeike, Bradbury, Lindert, and Pfaff (2019) since there is no scale suitable for the digital leadership skills of managers and whose validity has been proven. It is aimed to adapt the digital leadership scale, which was developed for empirical studies on digital leadership in Turkey, into Turkish, and to conduct validity and reliability studies. For this purpose, a questionnaire was applied to the employees of a factory producing electronic household goods in Manisa. Survey data were analyzed with the SPSS and AMOS programs. The findings reveal that the digital leadership scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool that could be used in research to be conducted in Turkey.

Özet

Yöneticilerin dijital liderlik becerilerine uygun ve geçerliliği kanıtlanmış bir ölçek bulunmadığı için Zeike, Bradbury, Lindert ve Pfaff (2019) tarafından dijital liderlik ölçeği geliştirilmiştir. Türkiye’de dijital liderliğe yönelik ampirik çalışmaların yapılabilmesi için geliştirilen dijital liderlik ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmasının yapılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla Manisa’daki elektronik ev eşyaları üreten bir fabrikanın çalışanlarına anket uygulaması yapılmıştır. Anket verileri SPSS ve AMOS programı yardımıyla analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular dijital liderlik ölçeğinin Türkiye’de yapılacak araştırmalarda kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜRÜCÜ, L., YIKILMAZ, İ., MAŞLAKÇI, A. (2022). DIGITAL LEADERSHIP: A SCALE ADAPTATION STUDY. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 1038–1050. https://ajindex.com/articles/865975

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. AlAjmi, M. K. (2022). The impact of digital leadership on teachers’ technology integration during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kuwait. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101928.
  2. Artüz, S. D. ve Bayraktar, O. (2021). The effect of relation between digital leadership practice and learning organization on the perception of individual performance. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(40), 97-120.
  3. Chanias, S., Myers, M. D. ve Hess, T. (2019). Digital transformation strategy making in pre-digital organizations: The case of a financial services provider. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(1), 17-33.
  4. Colbert, A., Yee, N. ve George, G. (2016). The digital workforce and the workplace of the future. Academy of management journal, 59(3), 731-739.
  5. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Blome, C. ve Papadopoulos, T. (2019). Big data and predictive analytics and manufacturing performance: integrating institutional theory, resource‐based view and big data culture. British Journal of Management, 30(2), 341-361.
  6. Eggers, B. ve Hollmann, S. (2018). Digital Leadership–Anforderungen, Aufgaben und Skills von Führungskräften in der „Arbeitswelt 4.0 “. In Disruption und Transformation Management (pp. 43-68).
  7. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. El Sawy, O. A., Kræmmergaard, P., Amsinck, H. ve Vinther, A. L. (2016). How LEGO built the foundations and enterprise capabilities for digital leadership. MIS quarterly executive, 15(2). Erhan, T., Uzunbacak, H. H. ve Aydin, E. (2022) From Conventional to Digital Leadership: Exploring Digitalization of Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior”, Management Research Review, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2021-0338
  8. Gürbüz, S. & Şahin, F. (2016). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara:
  9. Seçkin Yayıncılık Hambrick, D. C. ve Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review, 9(2), 193-206.
  10. Henderikx, M. ve Stoffers, J. (2022). An Exploratory Literature Study into Digital Transformation and Leadership: Toward Future-Proof Middle Managers. Sustainability, 14(2), 687. Kieser, H. (2017) The influence of digital leadership, innovation and organisational learning on the digital maturity of an organisation, Yayımlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Universty Of Pretoria Klein, M. (2020), Leadership characteristics ın the era of digital transformation, BMIJ, 8(1), 883-902.
  11. Kraus, S., Durst, S., Ferreira, J.