SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

PIERRE BOURDIEU: HABITUS IN THE STRUCTURAL REASON

PIERRE BOURDIEU: YAPISAL AKILDA HABITUS

Ahmed Hamza ALPAY
Pages
982–992
Publication Date
2022-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this direction, in the article, habitus, one of the main parameters of Bourdieu sociology, will be discussed in the axis of structural reason.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The daily struggles that occur between the actors facilitating the understanding of social phenomena in order to maintain the pattern characteristic of the era are specifically designed in location and placement.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Together with numerous and repeated questions, the structural reason refers to creating unique insights into multifaceted phenomena, to the habitus in cultural processes about their functioning, to making sense of the self.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this direction, in the article, habitus, one of the main parameters of Bourdieu sociology, will be discussed in the axis of structural reason.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fail · Habitus · Pierre Bourdieu

Abstract

The daily struggles that occur between the actors facilitating the understanding of social phenomena in order to maintain the pattern characteristic of the era are specifically designed in location and placement. Together with numerous and repeated questions, the structural reason refers to creating unique insights into multifaceted phenomena, to the habitus in cultural processes about their functioning, to making sense of the self. In the structural reason, an agent's positioning in social space inherits the immanent teachings of the social world as integral components of the same design. In Bourdieu sociology, the authority to define and legitimize cultural values requires acquiring an objective measure of distance and academic experience in the research problem of the relevant approach to understanding the frequency of contexts. This article focuses on some important contributions in the methodology of habitus-oriented social science rather than the causes of the themes and sub-themes identified in Bourdieu's sociology. In this direction, in the article, habitus, one of the main parameters of Bourdieu sociology, will be discussed in the axis of structural reason.

Özet

Sosyal fenomenlerin anlaşılmasını kolaylaştıran aktörler arasında meydana gelen günlük mücadeleler, çağın karakteristik kalıbını sürdürmek için konum ve yerleşimde özel olarak tasarlanmıştır. Çok yönlü fenomenlere benzersiz içgörüler oluşturmak için, işleyişi hakkında sayısız ve tekrarlanan sorularla birlikte yapısal akıl; benliği anlamlandırmada kültürel süreçlerdeki habitusa atıfta bulunur. Yapısal akılda, aynı tasarımın ayrılmaz bileşenleri olarak bir failin sosyal uzamda konumlanması, toplumsal dünyanın içkin öğretilerini miras alır. Bourdieu sosyolojisinde, kültürel değerleri tanımlama ve meşrulaştırma yetkisi nesnel bir mesafe ölçüsü elde etmeyi ve yine bu sosyolojide; yaklaşımın araştırma probleminin doğasından kaynaklandığı fikri, akademik deneyim yoluyla bağlamların çeşitlilik ve sıklığını anlamayı gerektirir. Bu makale, Bourdieu sosyolojisinde belirlenen temalar ve alt temaların nedenlerine değil; sosyal bilim metodolojisinde habitus eksenli bazı önemli katkılara odaklanmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, makalede, Bourdieu sosyolojisinin temel parametrelerinden olan habitus, yapısal akıl ekseninde tartışılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALPAY, A. H. (2022). PIERRE BOURDIEU: HABITUS IN THE STRUCTURAL REASON. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 982–992. https://ajindex.com/articles/865971

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Adkins, L. (2011), Practice as Temporalisation: Bourdieu and Economic Crisis, (Eds.: S. Susen and B. Turner), The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays, s.347-366,
  2. Anthem Press.
  3. Archer, M. S. (2010),
  4. Routine, Reflexivity, and Realism, Sociological Theory, 28(3), s.272-303.
  5. Bennett, A. ve Elman, C. (2006), Qualitative Research: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods, Annual Review of Political Science, 9(1), s.455-476.
  6. Bennett, T. (2011),
  7. Culture, Choice, Necessity: A political Critique of Bourdieu's Aesthetic, Poetics, 39(6), s.530-546.
  8. Bourdieu, P., Schultheis, F., Pfeuffer, A. ve Susen, S. (2011), With Weber Against Weber: In Conversation With Pierre Bourdieu, (Eds.: S. Susen and B. Turner), The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays, s.111-124,
  9. Anthem Press.
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1977), Structures and the Habitus, (Çev.: R. Nice), Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge Studies in Social and Cultural Anthropology), s.72-95, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Collet, F. (2009), Does Habitus Matter? A Comparative Review of Bourdieu’s Habitus and Simon’s Bounded Rationality with Some Implications for Economic Sociology, Sociological Theory, 27(4), s.419-434.
  12. Cruz, J. (1996),
  13. Habitus, Solidarity, and Authority, Gentlemen, Bourgeois, and Revolutionaries: Political Change and Cultural Persistence among the Spanish Dominant Groups, 1750–1850, s.169-207, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. David, J. (2020), On an Enigmatic Text by Pierre Bourdieu, (Eds.: J. Ahearne and J. Speller), Bourdieu and the Literary Field: Paragraph Volume 35, Number 1, s.115-130,
  15. Edinburgh University Press.
  16. Delva, J., Forrier, A. ve Cuyper, N. D. (2021), Integrating Agency and Structure in Employability: Bourdieu's Theory of Practice, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 127, s.1-11.
  17. Dubois, V. (2011), Cultural Capital Theory vs. Cultural Policy Beliefs: How Pierre Bourdieu Could Have Become a Cultural Policy Advisor and Why He Did Not, Poetics, 39, s.491–506.
  18. Ebrahim, A. (2003), The Making of NGOs: The Relevance of Foucault and Bourdieu, NGOs and Organizational Change: Discourse, Reporting, and Learning, s.7-20, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Gerring, J. (2017),
  20. Qualitative Methods, Annual Review of Political Science, 20(1), s.15-36.
  21. Greene, M. (1986), Qualitative Research and the Uses of Literature, Journal of Thought, 21(3), s.69-83.
  22. Haenssgen, M. J. (2019),
  23. Qualitative Research Issues, Interdisciplinary Qualitative Research in Global Development: A Concise Guide, E