SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3

Barriers In Partnerships In Open Innovation Process

Ömür Yaşar SAATÇIOĞLU
Pages
99–119
Publication Date
2013-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This research aims to explain evolution of open innovation, partnerships as main actors in knowledge and technology outflows, and intellectual property as the concept that protects knolwedge flows. external environment of the firm.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, innovation is a receipt for most of the problems the firms are facing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition to such initiative, they should cooperate with other actors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This research aims to explain evolution of open innovation, partnerships as main actors in knowledge and technology outflows, and intellectual property as the concept that protects knolwedge flows. external environment of the firm.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Open innovation · Partnerships · Intellectual Property

Abstract

Today, innovation is a receipt for most of the problems the firms are facing. Today, firms can’t develop innovations merely contenting themselves with their own effortful struggles. In addition to such initiative, they should cooperate with other actors. Cooperating with other actors outside the firm opens the innovation process. Open innovation has lots of advantages which can be categorised in two main groups : increasing revenues, and decreasing costs. The main idea in open innovation strenghtens the relations with external environment by increasing knowledge and technology inflows and outflows. However, dealing with the boundaries of the firm, there are barriers related with knowledge and technology flows. This research aims to explain evolution of open innovation, partnerships as main actors in knowledge and technology outflows, and intellectual property as the concept that protects knolwedge flows. external environment of the firm.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAATÇIOĞLU, Ö. Y. (2013). Barriers In Partnerships In Open Innovation Process. Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3, 99–119. https://ajindex.com/articles/861318

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Awe, E.W., Griffith, A., & Stephenson, P.(2011). Identifyng and Tackling Problems Militating Against Youth Interest in Constructon Crafts Careers: Panacea for Effective PPP Implementation in Nigeria, A.Akintoye, C.Lancashire, S.Renukappa(Eds.), Public-Private Partnerships, 45-60.
  2. Barge-Gil, A.(2010), Open, semi-open and closed innovators: Towards an explanation of degree of openness. Industry and Innovation, 17(6), 577-607.
  3. Birkinshaw, J., Bessant, J. & Delbridge, R.(2007).
  4. Finding, Forming and Performing: Creating Networks for Discontinuous Innovation. California Management Review, 49(3), 67-84.
  5. Carbone, F., Contrereas, J., Hernandez, J. & Gomez-Perez, J.S. (2012). Open innovation in an Enterprise 3.0 Framework: Three Case Studies, Expert System with Applications, 39, 8929-8939.
  6. Chesbrough, H.W.(2003). Open Innovation: The New Imprerative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press.
  7. Chesbrough, H.W.(2003a). The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Intellectual Property, California Management Review, 45(3), 33-58.
  8. Chesbrough, H.W.(2003b).
  9. The Era of Open Innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, Spring, 35-41.
  10. Chesbrough, H.W.(2004). Managing Open Innovation. Research Technology Management, 47(1), 23-26.
  11. Chesbrough, H.W.(2007). Why Companies Should Have Open Business Models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 22-28.
  12. Chesbrough, H.W. Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Idustrial Evolution, In H.W.Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, W., & J.West (Eds). (2008). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press.
  13. Dahlender, L., Frederiksen, L. & Rullani, F.(2008). Online communities and open innovation: Governance and symbolic value creation. Industry and Innovation, 15(2), 115-123.
  14. Dahlender, L., Gann, D.M.(2010). How open is inovation?. Research Policy, 39, 699-709.
  15. Edelmann, J. & Volchek, D.(2010). Open innovation in cross borders – advantages or disadvantages? Strategic options analysis, In M.Torkkeli (Eds.), Frontiers of Open Innovation, 5-24,
  16. Finland. Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H.W. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomeon. R&D Management, 39(4), 311-316.
  17. Fabrizio, K.R.(2006). The Use of University Research in Firm Innovation, In Henry Chesbrough, W.Van haverbeke, Joel West(Eds.), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, 134-160,
  18. Oxford University Press.
  19. Gassman, O., Enkel, E. & Chesbrough, H.W.(2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 1-9. Giann