Journals / Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY AND THE EFFECTS OF THEORY X AND THEORY Y LEADERSHIP STYLES ON AMBIDEXTROUS INNOVATION

Pages
115–144
Publication Date
2017-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The important point here is that their Theory Y point of view, not their attitude, still holds, and that change in attitude is due to the fear to “losing everything”.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper explores leadership-innovation ambidexterity relationship from the perspective of McGregor’s Theory X and Y when faced with environmental uncertainty and further investigates which leadership attitude is more inclined to exploitative or explorative innovation and what the effect of perceived environmental uncertainty is.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A two-page questionnaire was delivered to the owners and managers of 200 registered chandelier makers and lighting firms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The important point here is that their Theory Y point of view, not their attitude, still holds, and that change in attitude is due to the fear to “losing everything”.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Theory X and Theory Y · SMEs · Innovations

Abstract

This paper explores leadership-innovation ambidexterity relationship from the perspective of McGregor’s Theory X and Y when faced with environmental uncertainty and further investigates which leadership attitude is more inclined to exploitative or explorative innovation and what the effect of perceived environmental uncertainty is. A two-page questionnaire was delivered to the owners and managers of 200 registered chandelier makers and lighting firms. The general finding of our study is that regardless of environmental uncertainty, among the ones we surveyed, the majority demonstrated Theory Y attitudes 50.9% . Again, 78.18% of the participants of the study perceived their business environment as highly uncertain. We found support to our assumption that perceived environmental uncertainty will result in a greater tendency to exhibit Theory X attitude by the Theory X managers/owners. Unexpectedly, similar results were also observed for Theory Y managers/owners under the same circumstances in which they are inclined to give up some of their Theory Y attitudes. The important point here is that their Theory Y point of view, not their attitude, still holds, and that change in attitude is due to the fear to “losing everything”.

🔖

Cite This Article

STAUB, S., ARSLAN, A. (2017). ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY AND THE EFFECTS OF THEORY X AND THEORY Y LEADERSHIP STYLES ON AMBIDEXTROUS INNOVATION. Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 115–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/861254

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abidin, S.B.Z., Bin Mokhtar, S.S. & Bin Yusoff, R.Z. (2011), “A Systematic Analysis of Innovation Studies: A Proposed Framework on Relationship between Innovation Process and Firm’s Performance”, The Asian Journal of Technology Management, 4 (2), 65-83.
  2. Adams, R. (2003). Perceptions of Innovations: Exploring and Developing Innovation Classification (Unpublished doctoral Thesis). Cranfield University, School of Management. Retrieved June 29, 2015, from http://dspace.lib. cranfield. ac.uk/handle/1826/124. Andriopoulos, C. & Lewis, M.W. (2009), “Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation”, Organization Science, 20 (4), 696–717.
  3. Arslan, A. & Staub, S. (2012), “Theory X and Theory Y Type Leadership Behavior and its Impact on Organizational Performance: Small Business Owners in the Şishane Lighting and Chandelier District”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 102-111.
  4. Avolio, B.J., Reichard, R.J., Hannah, S.T., Walumbwa, F.O. & Chan, A. (2009), “A meta-analytic review of leadership impact research: Experimental and quasiexperimental studies”, The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 764–784.
  5. Baglin, J. (2014), “Improving Your Exploratory Factor Analysis for Ordinal Data: A Demonstration Using FACTOR”, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 19(5), 1-15.
  6. Bass, B. M. And Bass, R. (2008). The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications. Free Press,
  7. USA. Birkinshaw, J. & Gibson, C. (2004), “Building ambidexterity into an organization”, MIT Sloan Management Review, 45 (4), 47-55.
  8. Bledow, R., Frese, M. & Mueller, V. (2011), “Ambidextrous leadership for innovation: the influence of culture”, in William H. Mobley, Ming Li, Ying Wang (Eds.), Advances in Global Leadership (Vol. 6, pp. 41-69). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Brion, S., Mothe, C. & Sabatier,M. (2010), “The Impact of Organisational Context and Competences on Innovation Ambidexterity”, International Journal of Innovation Management, 14 (2):151-178.
  9. Carson, C.M. (2005), “A historical view of Douglas McGregor’s Theory Y”, Management Decision, 43, 450-460.
  10. Chang, Y. & Hughes, M. (2012), “Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small- to medium-sized firms”, European Management Journal, 30, 1–17.
  11. Chang, Y., Hughes, M., & Hotho, S. (2011), “Internal and external antecedents of SMEs’ innovation ambidexterity outcomes”, Management Decision, 49 (10), 1658- 1676. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behaviora