SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

The Mediating Role of Eco-innovation Practices on the Relationship between Consumer Demand, Supplier Collaboration and Reducing Pollution in Manufacturing Enterprises

Üretim İşletmelerinde Tüketici Talebi, Tedarikçi İş Birliği ve Kirliliği Azaltma İlişkisinde Eko-inovasyon Faaliyetlerinin Ara Değişken Etkisi

Melek YURDAKUL
Tanyeri USLU
Pages
28–58
Publication Date
2022-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Originality: The mediation effect of eco-innovation between consumer demand and supplier collaboration relationship in reducing pollution has been examined for the first time.With this study, it is aimed to contribute to the marketing and innovation management literature and to guide business management and decision makers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To reveal the mediation effect of eco-innovation practices, on the relationship between consumer demand and supplier collaboration variables and reducing pollution variable.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: Data has been gathered from 203 manufacturing enterprises, performing research and development (R&D) activities in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Originality: The mediation effect of eco-innovation between consumer demand and supplier collaboration relationship in reducing pollution has been examined for the first time.With this study, it is aimed to contribute to the marketing and innovation management literature and to guide business management and decision makers.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:eko-pazarlama inovasyonu · eko-süreç inovasyonu · eko-ürün inovasyonu

Abstract

Purpose: To reveal the mediation effect of eco-innovation practices, on the relationship between consumer demand and supplier collaboration variables and reducing pollution variable. Method: Data has been gathered from 203 manufacturing enterprises, performing research and development (R&D) activities in Turkey. Structural equation modeling method was used to test the hypotheses. Findings: Although there has been found a mediation effect of eco-product and eco-process innovations, regarding reducing pollution between consumer demand and supplier collaboration variables, a mediation effect of eco-marketing innovation has not been found. Originality: The mediation effect of eco-innovation between consumer demand and supplier collaboration relationship in reducing pollution has been examined for the first time.With this study, it is aimed to contribute to the marketing and innovation management literature and to guide business management and decision makers.

Özet

Amaç: Eko-inovasyon uygulamalarının tüketici talebi ve tedarikçi iş birliği değişkenleri ile kirliliği azaltma değişkeni ilişkisinde ara değişen etkisini ortaya koymaktır. Yöntem: Veriler, Türkiye’de araştırma geliştirme (Ar-Ge) faaliyeti gerçekleştiren 203 üretim işletmesinden toplanmıştır. Hipotez testleri yapısal eşitlik modellemesi yöntemi kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Tüketici talepleri, tedarikçi iş birliği değişkenleri arasında kirliliği azaltmaya yönelik eko-inovasyon uygulamalarından; eko-ürün ve eko-süreç inovasyonun aradeğişken etkisi bulunmasına rağmen eko-pazarlama inovasyonun ara değişken etkisine rastlanılmamıştır. Özgün Değer: Eko-inovasyon uygulamalarının, tüketici talebi ve tedarikçi iş birliği değişkenlerinin ilişkisinde kirliliği azaltma üzerindeki ara değişken etkisi ilk defa incelenmiştir. Bu çalışma ile pazarlama ve inovasyon yönetimi literatürüne katkı sağlamak, işletme yönetimine ve karar alıcılara rehber olmak hedeflenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YURDAKUL, M., USLU, T. (2022). The Mediating Role of Eco-innovation Practices on the Relationship between Consumer Demand, Supplier Collaboration and Reducing Pollution in Manufacturing Enterprises. Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 28–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/861160

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abdel-Baset, M., Chang, V., Gamal, A. (2019), “Evaluation of the green supplychain management practices: A novelneutrosophicapproach”, Computers in Industry, 108, 210-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.02.013
  2. Acebo, E., Miguel‐Dávila, J. Á., Nieto, M. (2021), “Externalstakeholderengagement: Complementaryandsubstitutiveeffects on firms’ eco‐innovation”, Business Strategyandthe Environment, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2770
  3. Akyol, M. & Mete, E. (2021). “Çevresel Teknolojik İnovasyonların CO2 Emisyonu Üzerindeki Etkisi: OECD Ülkeleri Örneği”. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, 71 (2), 569-590. DOI: 10.26650/ISTJECON2021-935480 Alarcón, D., Sánchez, J. A., De Olavide, U. (2015),“Assessingconvergentand discriminant validity in the ADHD-R IV ratingscale: User-writtencommandsfor Average Variance Extracted (AVE), Composite Reliability (CR), and Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT)”,In Spanish STATA Meeting,1-39.
  4. Alvarez, S. A., Busenitz, L. W. (2001), “The entrepreneurship of resource-basedtheory”, Journal of management, 27(6), 755-775. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700609
  5. Anton, W. R. Q., Deltas, G., Khanna, M. (2004), “Incentivesforenvironmental self-regulationandimplicationsforenvironmentalperformance”, Journal of environmentaleconomicsandmanagement, 48(1), 632-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2003.06.003
  6. Ar, Murat, I., & Baki, B. (2011), “Antecedentsandperformanceimpacts of productversusprocessinnovation: EmpiricalevidencefromSMEslocated in Turkishscienceandtechnologyparks”, EuropeanJournal of Innovation Management, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 172-206. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061111124885
  7. Arundel, Anthony, Rene Kemp (2009),
  8. MeasuringEco-Innovation, UM-MERIT. Barney, J. (1991), “FirmResourcesandSustainedCompetitive Advantage”, J. Manag. 17, 99–120, doi:10.1177/014920639101700108. Belin, J., Horbach, J., Oltra, V. (2011), “Determinantsandspecificities of eco-innovations–An econometricanalysisforthe French andGermanindustrybased on theCommunityInnovationSurvey”, Groupe de Recherche en EconomieThéorique et Appliquée (GREThA), (No. 2011-17), 2-22.
  9. Ben Amara, D., Chen, H. (2021), “EvidencefortheMediatingEffects of Eco-InnovationandtheImpact of DrivingFactors on Sustainable Business Growth of Agribusiness”, Glob J FlexSystManag 22, 251–266 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-021-00274-w
  10. Boyce, W.S., Mano, H. (2018), “An inquiryintothesupplierselectiondecisionfromthebusiness-to-consumer (B2C) perspective”, Journal of Business &Industrial Mar