Journals / Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Adaptation of General Phubbing Scale to Turkish Culture and Investigation of Phubbing Levels of University Students in Terms of Various Variables

Pages
48–60
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The analysis results showed that the scale has the power to measure the desired characteristics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to adapt the Generic Phubbing Scale (GPS) to Turkish culture and to examine the phubbing levels of university students concerning various variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Acceptable goodness-of-fit indices werefound in the first-order confirmatory factor analysis (x2/df=2.47, GFI=0.92, IFI=0.92, CFI=0.95, NFI=0.92AGFI=0.89, TLI=0.94, and RMSEA=0.067) and the second-order confirmatory factor analysis (x2/df=2.61,GFI=0.92, IFI=0.95, CFI=0.95, NFI=0.92 AGFI=0.89, TLI=0.93, and RMSEA=0.070) performed to test theconstruct validity of the GPS.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The analysis results showed that the scale has the power to measure the desired characteristics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aimed to adapt the Generic Phubbing Scale (GPS) to Turkish culture and to examine the phubbing levels of university students concerning various variables. Acceptable goodness-of-fit indices werefound in the first-order confirmatory factor analysis (x2/df=2.47, GFI=0.92, IFI=0.92, CFI=0.95, NFI=0.92AGFI=0.89, TLI=0.94, and RMSEA=0.067) and the second-order confirmatory factor analysis (x2/df=2.61,GFI=0.92, IFI=0.95, CFI=0.95, NFI=0.92 AGFI=0.89, TLI=0.93, and RMSEA=0.070) performed to test theconstruct validity of the GPS. Later, the significance of the upper and lower 27% groups was analyzed usingan independent t-test. The analysis results showed that the scale has the power to measure the desired characteristics. Chronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficient was found to be a=89. The study examineduniversity students’ phubbing levels in terms of various variables and performed a hierarchical regressionanalysis to explore whether the variables of smartphone addiction, fear of missing out, and boredom proneness were predictive variables for university students’ phubbing addiction levels. According to the results,these three variables were found to be significant predictor variables for the phubbing levels of universitystudents.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUMCAĞIZ, H., YAM, F. C. (2022). Adaptation of General Phubbing Scale to Turkish Culture and Investigation of Phubbing Levels of University Students in Terms of Various Variables. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 48–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/857011

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Aagaard, J. (2019). Digital akrasia: A qualitative study of phubbing. Al & Society, 1-8. [Crossref] Al-Saggaf, Y., MacCulloch, R., & Wiener, K. (2018). Trait boredom ıs a predictor of phubbing frequency. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 1-8. [Crossref] Ayhan, B., & Balcı, Ş. (2009). Kırgızistan’da üniversite gençliği ve internet: Bir kullanımlar ve doyumlar araştırması. Bilig Journal of Social Sciences of the Turkish World, 48, 13-40.
  2. Balta, S., Emirtekin, E., Kircaburun, K., & Griffiths, M. D. (2018). Neuroticism, trait fear of missing out, and phubbing: the mediating role of state fear of missing out and problematic ınstagram use. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1-12. [Crossref] Barrios-Borjas, D. A., Bejar-Ramos, V. A., & Cauchos-Mora, V. S. (2017). Uso excesivo de Smartphones/teléfonos celulares: Phubbing y Nomofobia. Revista Chilena de Neuro-Psiquiatría, 55(3), 205-206. [Crossref] Blanca, M. J., & Bendayan, R. (2018). Spanish version of the Phubbing Scale: Internet addiction, facebook intrusion, and fear of missing out as correlates. Psicothema, 30(4), 449-454. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2018.153 Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara:
  3. Pegem Akademi. Carvajal, E. T. (2017). Families and technologies. What about the phubbing in Mexico? Horyzonty Wychowania, 16(37), 59-69. doi: 10.17399/HW.2017.163704 Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Measuring phone snubbing behavior: Development and validation of the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) and the generic scale of being phubbed (GSBP). Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 5-17. [Crossref] Çakır, Ö., & Oğuz, E. (2017). Lise öğrencilerinin yalnızlık düzeyleri ile akıllı telefon bağımlılığı arasındaki ilişki. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 418-429. [Crossref] Çelik, E. H. & Yılmaz, V. (2013). LISREL 9.1 ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi, temel kavramlar- uygulamalar-programlama. Anı Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  4. Çizmeci, E. (2017). Disconnected, though satisfied: Phubbing behavior and relationship satisfaction. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 7(2), 364-375. [Crossref] Davey, S., Davey, A., Raghav, S. K., Singh, J. V., Singh, N., Blachnio, A., & Przepiórkaa, A. (2018). Predictors and consequences of “Phubbing” among adolescents and youth in India: An impact evaluation study. Journal of Family & Community Medicine, 25(1), 35. doi: 10.4103/ jfcm.JFCM_71_17 DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development. Ne