Journals / Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

The Stigmatization of Drug Addiction in South-East Turkey the Case of Drug Abuse Prevention Programme for Youth Project in Turkey

Pages
137–141
Publication Date
2022-11-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The interventions ought to account for stigmatization to ensure realistic delivery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cannabis use undergoes a dynamic redefinition under selected legal frameworks globally.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A follow-up study was conducted among the youth participants of a pilot phase of the program (n = 20), developed by an international group of professionals in the form of an online work- shop and video campaign.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The interventions ought to account for stigmatization to ensure realistic delivery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Cannabis use undergoes a dynamic redefinition under selected legal frameworks globally. Many preven- tion programs face a dilemma between delivering abstinence objectives and pursuing more nuanced, harm reductionist aims. However, drug use in South-East Turkey is strongly stigmatized and is absent from the official life of the community, so neither of these discussions takes place. The authors participated in the development of a Drug Abuse Prevention programme for Youth and this article is grounded in quali- tative data from Turkey. A follow-up study was conducted among the youth participants of a pilot phase of the program (n = 20), developed by an international group of professionals in the form of an online work- shop and video campaign. The data were collected by conducting a semi-structured qualitative interview. The participants live amid the omnipresence of drugs and simultaneously very actively detach themselves from it. There is a powerful taboo and families attempt to conceal the cases of drug use among them. They also stigmatize the users in order to distinguish themselves from the substance. It is counterproductive to talk about drug use to audiences who actively deny its presence within the community. The interventions ought to account for stigmatization to ensure realistic delivery.

🔖

Cite This Article

Wanke, M., Macit, R., Gülerce, H. (2022). The Stigmatization of Drug Addiction in South-East Turkey the Case of Drug Abuse Prevention Programme for Youth Project in Turkey. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 137–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/856969

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. Simon & Schuster. Bourdieu, P. (1987). What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32, 1–17.
  2. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.
  3. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014).Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications. Durkheim, E. (1897). Suicide: A study in sociology. Felix Alcan. EMCDDA. (2018). European drug report: Trends and developments. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. EMCDDA. (2019). European drug report: Trends and developments. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Fernández-Esquer, M. E., & Agoff, M. C. (2012). Drinking and working in a Cantina: Misrecognition and the threat of stigma. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 14(4), 407–420. [CrossRef] Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Penguin Books. Grinspoon, L., & Bakalar, J. B. (1995). Marihuana as medicine: A plea for reconsideration. JAMA, 273(23), 1875–1876.
  4. Kaplan, H. B. (1982). Conceptual issues in marijuana decriminalization research. Contemporary Drug Problems, 10, 365–382.
  5. Lemert, E. (1951). Primary and secondary deviation. Critical Concepts in Sociology, 3, 603–607.
  6. Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. (2014). Stigma power. Social Science and Medi - cine, 103, 24–32. [CrossRef] Mauthner, N. S., & Doucet, A. (2003). Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis.Sociology, 37(3), 413–431. [CrossRef] Migala, S., & Flick, U. (2018). Individual needs, cultural barriers, public discourses: Taking qualitative inquiry into the public sphere. In Qualitative inquiry in the public sphere (pp. 98–116).
  7. Routledge. Tannenbaum, F. (1938). Crime and the community. Columbia University Press.