Journals / Ilahiyat Studies / 2015 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

A Treatise on Predestination: Sharḥ Ḥadīth Iḥtijāj Ādam wa-Mūsā of Quṭb al-Dīn-zāda al-Iznīqī

Pages
75–120
Publication Date
2016-02-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study seeks to introduce the precious treatise by Quṭb al-Dīn-zāda to present scientific circles through analysis, interpretation, and translation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The ḥadīth that is well-known in Islamic theology as “Iḥtijāj Ādam wa-Mūsā/Discussion between Adam and Moses” often comes to the fore in debates about predestination because of its content.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Ottoman scholar Quṭb al-Dīn-zāda al-Iznīqī (d. 885/1480) was among those who analyzed the ḥadīth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study seeks to introduce the precious treatise by Quṭb al-Dīn-zāda to present scientific circles through analysis, interpretation, and translation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Iḥtijāj Ādam wa-Mūsā · Quṭb al-Dīn-zāda al-Iznīqī · predestination

Abstract

The ḥadīth that is well-known in Islamic theology as “Iḥtijāj Ādam wa-Mūsā/Discussion between Adam and Moses” often comes to the fore in debates about predestination because of its content. Almost any scholar studying fate has an affirmative or contrary comment on this ḥadīth. The Ottoman scholar Quṭb al-Dīn-zāda al-Iznīqī (d. 885/1480) was among those who analyzed the ḥadīth. He joined the discussion with a specific treatise that became important on this issue. As a Sufi scholar, he treated the ḥadīth through the Sufi approach and brought a different point of view. This study seeks to introduce the precious treatise by Quṭb al-Dīn-zāda to present scientific circles through analysis, interpretation, and translation.

Özet

The ḥadīth that is well-known in Islamic theology as “Iḥtijāj Ādam wa-Mūsā/Discussion between Adam and Moses” often comes to the fore in debates about predestination because of its content. Almost any scholar studying fate has an affirmative or contrary comment on this ḥadīth. The Ottoman scholar Quṭb al-Dīn-zāda al-Iznīqī (d. 885/1480) was among those who analyzed the ḥadīth. He joined the discussion with a specific treatise that became important on this issue. As a Sufi scholar, he treated the ḥadīth through the Sufi approach and brought a different point of view. This study seeks to introduce the precious treatise by Quṭb al-Dīn-zāda to present scientific circles through analysis, interpretation, and translation.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAHAN, A., ŞAKAR, M. (2016). A Treatise on Predestination: Sharḥ Ḥadīth Iḥtijāj Ādam wa-Mūsā of Quṭb al-Dīn-zāda al-Iznīqī. Ilahiyat Studies, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 75–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/852403

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Abū Dāwūd, Sulaymān ibn al-Ashʿath al-Sijistānī, Sunan Abī Dāwūd, 5 vols., (Istanbul: Çağrı Yayınları, 1981). Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad al-Shaybānī, al-Musnad, 6 vols., (Istanbul: Çağrı Yay., 1982).
  2. Arpaguş, Hatice, “Sofyalı Bâlî Efendi’nin Kazâ ve Kader Risâlesi ve A‘yân-ı Sâbite Açısından İnsanın Sorumluluğu,” Marmara Üniversitesi İlâhiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 30/1 (2006), 51-88. al-Ashʿarī, Abū al-Ḥasan ʿAlī ibn ʿIsmāʿīl, al-Ibānah ʿan uṣūl al-diyānah (ed. Bashīr Muḥammad ʿUyūn; Damascus: Maktabat al-Dār al-Bayān, 1990). al-ʿAynī, Abū Muḥammad Badr al-Dīn Maḥmūd ibn Aḥmad, ʿUmdat al-qārī Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, 25 vols., (eds. Muḥammad Munīr Abdah Aghā l-Dimashqī et al.; Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, n.d.). al-Baghdādī, Abū Manṣūr ʿAbd al-Qāhir ibn Ṭāhir, al-Farq bayn al-firaq wa-bayān al-firqa al-nājiya minhum (ed. Muḥammad ʿUthmān al-Khusht; Cairo: Maktabat Ibn Sīnā, n.d.). al-Baghawī, Abū Muḥammad al-Ḥusayn ibn Masʿūd, Sharḥ al-Sunna, 16 vols., (ed. Zuhayr al-Shāyīsh and Shuʿayb al-Arnāʾūṭ; Beirut: al-Maktab al-Islāmī, 1403/1983). al-Baghdādī, Ismāʿīl Pāshā ibn Muḥammad, Hadiyyat al-ʿārifīn asmāʾ al-muʾallifīn wa āthār al-muṣannifīn, 2 vols., (eds. Mahmut Kemal İnal and Avni Aktuç; Istanbul: Maarif Basımevi, 1955).
  3. Bağcı, Hacı Musa, İnsanın Kaderi-Hadislerin Telkin Ettiği Kader Anlayışı (Ankara: Ankara Okulu Yayınları, 2009). al-Bayḍāwī, Abū al-Khayr ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿUmar, Anwār al-tanzīl wa-asrār al-taʾwīl, 5 vols., (ed. Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Marʿashlī; Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, n.d.). al-Bazdawī, Abū al-Yusr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad, Uṣūl al-dīn (ed. Hans Peter Linss; Cairo: al-Maktaba al-Azhariyya li-l-Turāth, 2003). al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn İsmāʿīl, al-Jāmīʿ al-ṣaḥīḥ, 8 vols., (Istanbul: al Maktaba al Islāmī, 1979). Bursali Meḥmed Ṭāhir Efendī, ʿUthmānli Muʾalliflari, 2 vols., (Istanbul: Maṭbaʿa-i ʿĀmira, 1333). Demirli, Ekrem, “Vahdet-i Vücûd,” Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi (DİA), XXXXII, 431-435. Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr, Abū ʿUmar Yūsuf ibn ʿAbd Allāh, al-Istidhkār al-jāmiʿ li-madhāhib fuqahāʾ al-amṣār wa-ʿulamāʾ al-aqṭār fīmā taḍammanahū l-Muwaṭṭaʾ min maʿānī l-raʾy wa l-āthār wa-sharḥ dhālika kullihī bi-l-īʿjāz wa-l-ikhtiṣār, 30 vols., (ed. ʿAbd al-Muʿṭī Amīn Qalʿajī; Cairo: Dār al-Waʿy, 1993). Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr, Abū ʿUmar Yūsuf ibn ʿAbd Allāh, al-Tamhīd limā fī l-Muwaṭṭaʾ min al-maʿānī wa-l-asānīd, 26 vols., (eds. Saʿīd Aḥmad Aʿrāb, Muḥammad al-Fallāḥ et al.; Maghreb: Wizā