Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi / 1997 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1&2

THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE CHALLENGE OF ENLARGEMENT

Pages
147–178
Publication Date
2015-02-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Having presented the evidence that widening has so far been accompanied by modest deepening via limited institutional reform which re- sulted in the eventual extension of the powers of the EC's institutions, it concludes by arguing that the future enlargements of the EU will succeed only if widening is reconciled with deepening in a Community model of differentiated integration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of the article is to assess the impact of enlargement on the evolu- tion of the relationship between deepening and widening of the Community.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The article deals with the enlargements of the 1970s and 1980s, the 1995 enlargement and the probable Eastern enlargement of the EU and how they affect the process of deepening of the Community.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Having presented the evidence that widening has so far been accompanied by modest deepening via limited institutional reform which re- sulted in the eventual extension of the powers of the EC's institutions, it concludes by arguing that the future enlargements of the EU will succeed only if widening is reconciled with deepening in a Community model of differentiated integration.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The objective of the article is to assess the impact of enlargement on the evolu- tion of the relationship between deepening and widening of the Community. The article deals with the enlargements of the 1970s and 1980s, the 1995 enlargement and the probable Eastern enlargement of the EU and how they affect the process of deepening of the Community. Having presented the evidence that widening has so far been accompanied by modest deepening via limited institutional reform which re- sulted in the eventual extension of the powers of the EC's institutions, it concludes by arguing that the future enlargements of the EU will succeed only if widening is reconciled with deepening in a Community model of differentiated integration.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAHRAMAN, S. (2015). THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE CHALLENGE OF ENLARGEMENT. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1&2, 147–178. https://ajindex.com/articles/839362

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Bideleux, R. (1996), "The Southern Enlargement of the EC", in R. Bideleux and R. Taylor (eds), European Integration and Disintegration, London: Routledge, 127 ·153. Bieber, R. et al (1985), An Ever Closer Union? A Critical Analysis of the Draft Treaty Es· tablishing the European Union, Brussels: Commission of the ECfThe European Perspectives Series. ••••••••••••••••. (1988), 1992 One European Market? A Critical Analysis of the Commission's In· temal Market Strategy, Baden-Baden: Nomos. Cameron, D. (1992), "The 1992 Initiative: Causes and Consequences", in A. Sbragia (ed.), Euro-Politics: Institutions and Policy-Making in the New European Community, Washington: Brookings Institution, 23·74. Cameron, F. (1995), "The European Union and the Fourth Enlargement", Journal of Common Market Studies, 33, Annual Review, 17·34. Commission of the EC. (1985), Completing the Internal Market. White Paper from the Com· mission to the European Council, Brussels: COM (85) 310. ••••••••••••••••. (1986),
  2. Single European Act, Bulletin of the EC, Supplement 2·86. ••••••••••••••••. (1992) "Europe and the Challenge of Enlargement", Bulletin of the EC, Supple· ment 3·92. Corbett, R. (1993),
  3. Maastricht, From Conception to Ratification: A Comprehensive Reference Guide, Essex: Longman. Corbey, D. (1995), "Dialectical Functionalism: Stagnation as a Booster of European In· tegration", International Organization, 49 (2), 253·84. Den Hartog, A. (1992), "Greece and the European Political Union", in F. Laursen and S. Van· hoonacker (eds.), The Intergovernmental Conference on European Political Union, Maas· tricht: European Institute of Public Administration, 80-97.
  4. Duff, A. et al (eds.) (1994), Maastricht and Beyond: Building the European Union, London: Routledge. DukeS. (1996), "The Second Death (or the Second Coming?) of the WEU", Journal of Com· mon Market Studies, 34 (2), 167-96. THE EUROPE AN UNION AND THE CHALLENGE OF ENLARGEMENT 175 Edwards, G. (1991), "The EC and EFTA: Wider but Deeper?", Paradigms, 5 (1-2), 28-41.
  5. European Council of the EC. (1992), Conclusions of the Presidency in Lisbon, 26-27 June 1992, Agence Europe, 28 June 1992. ----------------. (1993), Conclusions of the Presideny in Copenhagen, 21-22 June 1993, Europe Documents, 24 June 1993.
  6. Falkner, G. and Nentwich, M. (1995), European Union: Democratic Perspectives After 1996, Wien: Service Fachverlag. Federal Trust. (1995), Building the Union: Refonn of the Institutions, Federal Trust Papers No. 3, London: PSI Publishe