Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

A COMPARISON OF ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY REGULATION AND RESTRUCTURING: GREECE AND TURKEY

ELEKTRİK ENDÜSTRİSİ REGÜLASYONU VE YENİDEN YAPILANMASINA DAİR BİR KARŞILAŞTIRMA: YUNANİSTAN VE TÜRKİYE

Pages
65–84
Publication Date
2015-07-09
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The main conclusion is that the two industries face number of challenges, and that institutional and political reforms ensuring the smooth functioning of the electricity industries thus need to be enacted.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main aim of this paper is to compare the experience of regulation and restructuring in the Greek and the Turkish electricity industries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, a comparison of data on the two industries is employed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The main conclusion is that the two industries face number of challenges, and that institutional and political reforms ensuring the smooth functioning of the electricity industries thus need to be enacted.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Elektrik endüstrisi · regülasyon · yeniden yapılanma

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to compare the experience of regulation and restructuring in the Greek and the Turkish electricity industries. For this purpose, a comparison of data on the two industries is employed. A quantitative analysis of the impact of restructuring these two countries’ presented and complemented with an evaluation of relevant legislation, policy changes and regulation scores. The paper shows that the electricity industries in Turkey and Greece have undergone a radical restructuring, but which remains an ongoing process. The main conclusion is that the two industries face number of challenges, and that institutional and political reforms ensuring the smooth functioning of the electricity industries thus need to be enacted. In addition, there is a crucial need for a debate about regulatory principles for the industry in both countries

Özet

Bu makalenin amacı, Yunanistan ve Türk elektrik endüstrilerinin regülasyon ve yeniden yapılanma tecrübelerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Bu amaca yönelik söz konusu iki endüstrinin verilerinin karşılaştırılması tercih edildi. Bu endüstrilerdeki yeniden yapılanmanın etkisi niceliksel analizle gösteriliyor. Bu analiz, iki ülkenin elektrik endüstrilerindeki yasal ve politika değişimleri ile regülasyon skorlarını kapsayan bir değerlendirmeyle tamamlanmaktadır. Makale, hem Türkiye hem de Yunanistan’daki elektrik endüstrilerinin radikal yeniden yapılanma içinde ٭ Asst. Prof. (PhD), Marmara University, Department of Economics, e-mail: [email protected] 66 A COMPARISON OF ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY REGULATION bulunduklarını ve bu sürecin hala devam ettiğini göstermektedir. Makalenin en önemli sonucu söz konusu elektrik endüstrilerinin çok sayıda problem ile karşı karşıya olduğudur. Dolayısıyla, bu iki elektrik endüstrisinin gerektiği şekilde işleyişinin sağlanabilmesi için kurumsal ve politik reformlara devam edilmesi gerekmektedir. Buna ilave olarak, Yunanistan ve Türk elektrik endüstrilerinin regülasyon prensipleri üzerine ciddi bir tartışmanın yürütülmesi de elzemdir

🔖

Cite This Article

REEL, Y. (2015). A COMPARISON OF ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY REGULATION AND RESTRUCTURING: GREECE AND TURKEY. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 65–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/839130

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Andrianesis, P., Biskasb& P., Liberopoulos, G., (2011), ‘An overview of Greece’s wholesale electricity market with emphasis on ancillary services’, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol.81,No.8, pp. 1631–1642.
  2. Atiyas, I., Çetin, T. & Gülen, G., (2012), Reforming Turkish Energy Market- Political Economy, Regulation and Competition in the Search for Energy Policy, Springer, New York. Avrupa Komisyonu, (2011), Türkiye 2011
  3. Yılı İlerleme Raporu, Avrupa Komisyonu, Brüksel. Camadan, E., (2011), ‘Why 2012 will be so important for the Restructured Turkish Electricity Market’, The Electricity Journal, Vol.24, No.10, pp. 70-78.
  4. Cetin, T. & Oguz, F., (2007), ‘The Politics of Regulation in the Turkish Electricity Market’, Energy Policy, Vol.35,No.3, pp. 1761-1770.
  5. Chalvatzis, K. J. & Hooper, E., (2009), ‘Energy security vs. climate change: Theoretical framework development and experience in selected EU electricity markets’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol.13,No.9, pp. 2703–2709.
  6. Conway, P. & Nicoletti, G., (2006), ‘Product market regulation in non-manufacturing sectors in OECD countries: measurement and highlights’, OECD Economics Department Working Paper No.530. Danias, N., Swales, J. K. & McGregor, P., (2013), ‘The Greek Electricity Market Reforms: Political and Regulatory Considerations’, Energy Policy, Vol.62, pp. 1040–1047. DPT, (2009), Electricity Energy Market and Supply Security Strategy Paper, Higher Board of Planning, Ankara.
  7. Durakoglu, S. M., (2011), ‘Political Institutions of Electricity Regulation: The Case of Turkey’, Energy Policy, Vol.39, No.9, pp. 5578-5587. Energy Market Regulatory Authority (EMRA), (2010), Electricity Market Report, http://www.epdk.gov.tr/documents/elektrik/rapor_yayin/ElectricityMarketReport2010.p df, Retrieved on: December 5, 2011. EIA (2014a), ‘International Energy Statistics’, http://www.eia.gov/countries/data.cfm Retrieved on: May 23, 2014. EIA, (2014b), ‘Policies that Work’, Electricity -Journal of International Energy Agency, Issue 6- 2nd quarter, pp. 4041http://www.iea.org/media/ieajournal/IEAENERGY_Issue6.pdf, Retrieved on: June 2, 2014. EIA, (2014c), Turkey Full Report, http://www.eia.gov/countries/cab.cfm?fips=TURetrieved on: May 24, 2014. ENTSOE, (2013), ‘Annual Work Programme 2013-2014’, European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity, https://www.entsoe.eu/publications/general-publications/annual-workprogramme/Pages/default.aspx, Retrieved on: February 28, 2014.
  8. Erdogan, F. H., Cetinkaya,