Journals / International Econometric Review / 2020 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

New Directions in Macroeceonomics

Pages
1–23
Publication Date
2020-06-08
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We hope to invite contributions in these areas for future issues.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The glaring failure of modern macroeconomics to predict the Global Financial Crisis, and to provide remedies for the Great Recession which followed, has led to renewed interest in alternative approaches to Macroeconomics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There is huge amount of ongoing work aimed at creating a Macroeconomics for the 21st Century.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We hope to invite contributions in these areas for future issues.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Political Economy · Complexity Economics · Ecological Economics

Abstract

The glaring failure of modern macroeconomics to predict the Global Financial Crisis, and to provide remedies for the Great Recession which followed, has led to renewed interest in alternative approaches to Macroeconomics. There is huge amount of ongoing work aimed at creating a Macroeconomics for the 21st Century. The task is of the highest priority, as failures of economic theory have led to misery for millions. Wrong measures of GDP, and cost-benefit calculation which fail to account for environmental costs, and prioritize private profits over social welfare, have created a climate catastrophe which threatens to destroy the planet. In accordance with the importance of this task, we are expanding the scope of this journal, to cover all new approaches to economics, which fall outside of the boxes of conventional macro, micro, and econometrics of the 20th Century. This article outlines seven broad categories of research directions, and four different methodological principles which fall outside the boundaries of the conventional approach, and offer promise for building a Macroeconomics for the 21st Century. We hope to invite contributions in these areas for future issues.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞÇI, S., ZAMAN, A. (2020). New Directions in Macroeceonomics. International Econometric Review, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 1–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/832129

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Acemoglu, D. (2020) Lecture Notes on Political Economy. https://economics.mit.edu/files/ 8753 (accessed April 17, 2020).
  2. Admati, A. (6 December 2019). There is no Economics without Politics. Evonomics https://evonomics.com/political-economy-blind-spots-and-a-challenge-to-academics/ (accessed April 17, 2020).
  3. Arestis, P. and M. C. Sawyer (2006). A handbook of alternative monetary economics. Edward Elgar Publishing. Arthur, W. B. (2018). Complexity Economics. Santa Fe Institute webpage, http://tuvalu.santafe. edu/~wbarthur/complexityeconomics.htm (accessed April 17, 2020).
  4. Arthur, W. B., S. Durlauf and D. A. Lane (1997). Introduction: Process and Emergence in the Economy http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/IntroEconomyAsEvolvingCAS.ArthurD urlaufLane1997.pdf (accessed April 17, 2020).
  5. Axelrod, R. (2006). Agent-based modeling as a bridge between disciplines. Handbook of computational economics, 2, 1565-1584.
  6. Bicchieri, C. (2016). Norms in the wild: How to diagnose, measure, and change social norms. Oxford University Press.
  7. Borjas, G. (2016). Labor Economics. 7th Edition,
  8. McGraw Hill. Bourguignon, F. and S. R. Chakravarty (2019). The measurement of multidimensional poverty. In Poverty, Social Exclusion and Stochastic Dominance. Singapore: Springer, 83-107.
  9. Bowles, S. and H. Gintis (2012). Democracy and capitalism: Property, community, and the contradictions of modern social thought. Routledge. Burnham, P. (2001). Marx, international political economy and globalisation. Capital & Class, 25(3), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680107500109.
  10. Cooter, R. and P. Rappoport (1984). Were the ordinalists wrong about welfare economics? Journal of Economic literature, 22 (2), 507-530.
  11. Denning, S. (2013). How modern economics is built on the world’s dumbest idea. Forbes, http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2013/07/22/how-modern-economics-is-built-on-the-worlds-dumbest-idea (accessed April 17, 2020).
  12. Dutt A. K. and E. J. Amadeo (1993)
  13. A Post-Keynesian Theory of Growth, Interest and Money. In The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations ed. M. Baranzini and G. C. Harcourt. London: Palgrave Macmillan, Easterlin, R. A., L. A. McVey, M. Switek, O. Sawangfa and J. S. Zweig (2010). The happiness–income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107 (52), 22463-22468.
  14. Findlay, R. and K. H. O'rourke (2009). Power and plenty: trade, war, and the world economy in the second millennium. Princeton University Press.
  15. Gasper, D. (2011). Pioneering the human