Journals / International Econometric Review / 2020 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Using Numbers to Persuade: Hidden Rhetoric of Statistics

Pages
75–97
Publication Date
2020-06-08
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, it is also desirable to understand hidden values to avoid deception.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Philosophy of current knowledge distinguishes facts from values.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We illustrate how apparently objective statistics conceal subjective choices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, it is also desirable to understand hidden values to avoid deception.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Data Interpretation · Wealth of Nations · Gross Domestic Product

Abstract

Philosophy of current knowledge distinguishes facts from values. It maintains that facts are objective, indisputable, universally verifiable and do not require to persuade. Since rhetoric is persuasion it is assumed to be deceptive and overlook reality. Therefore, statistics in its current form disregards rhetoric and emphasizes only numbers. It ignores meanings and interpretation of numbers that involve subjectivity and value judgements. In real world, numbers and values are entangled in a way that it becomes impossible to avoid subjectivity. So, it is used with an appearance of objectivity. We illustrate how apparently objective statistics conceal subjective choices. Most of real-world experiences cannot be reduced to numbers, but scientific approach compels us to measure everything. In the attempt to measure the unmeasurables like trust, intelligence and wealth etc.it is inevitable make subjective choices. There is no objective way to reduce multiple measures into one. In the field of economics values are involved even in seemingly indisputable numbers like GDP. It is value laden for the choice of factors, weights and their signs. Making comparisons on such measures without awareness have harmful implications for policy development. Moreover, it is also desirable to understand hidden values to avoid deception.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞÇI, S., HASSAN, N. (2020). Using Numbers to Persuade: Hidden Rhetoric of Statistics. International Econometric Review, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 75–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/832132

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ayer, A. J. (2012). Language, truth and logic (Vol. 1). Retrieved March 11, 2020, from Courier Corporation: http://www.math.chalmers.se/~ulfp/Review/langtruthlogic.pdf.
  2. Cassiers, I. and G. Thiry (2012). Alternative Indicators to GDP: Values behind Numbers. Adjusted Net Savings in Question. Applied Research in Quality of Life. Castles, I. and D. Henderson (2005). International Comparisons of GDP: Issues of Theory and Practice. World Economics, 6(1), 55 – 66. Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27 (1), 35-47.
  3. Edvinsson, L. and C. Stenfel (1999). Intellectual capital of nations—for future wealth creation. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 4 (1), 21-33.
  4. Fraasen, B. C. (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford University Press.
  5. Gladwell, M. (2011). The Order of Things. The New Yorker, 87 (1), 68-75.
  6. Hamilton, K., G. Ruta, K. Bolt, A. Markandya, S. Pedroso-Galinato, P. Silva,. L. Tajibaeva (2006). Where is the Wealth of Nations? Measuring Capital for the 21st Century. World Bank. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7505.
  7. Hands, D. (2007). The Future of Economics. Retrieved March 11, 2020, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1076818 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1076818.
  8. Hicks, J. R. (1940). The Valuation of the Social Income. Economica, 7 (26), 105-12.
  9. Huff, D. (1993). How to Lie with Statistics. W. W. Norton & Company Inc. Hunt, E. and W. Wittmann (2008). National intelligence and national prosperity. Intelligence, 36 (1), 1-9.
  10. Kelvin, L. (1889). Electrical Units of Measurement. In W. Thomson, Popular Lectures and Addresses (Vol. 1, pp. 73-136).
  11. Cambridge University Press.
  12. Keynes, J. M. (1936). Chapter 24. In The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (p. 383). Palgrave Macmillan. Lynn, R., T. Vanhanen and M. Stuart (2002). IQ and the wealth of nations. Greenwood Publishing Group. Manuelli, R. E. and A. Seshadri (2014). Human capital and the wealth of nations. American economic review, 104 (9), 2736-62.
  13. Nitzan, J., and S. Bichler (2009). Capitalization: Fiction, mirror or distortion? In Capital as Power: A study of order and creorder (pp. 167-182).
  14. Routledge. Piketty, T., S. Emmanuel and G. Zucman. (2018). Distributional national accounts: methods and estimates for the United States. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133 (2), 553-609.
  15. Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Times. Retr