SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Econometric Review / 2026 / Volume: 18 Issue: 1

Determinants of Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan African Countries: Panel Data Analysis for the Period 1990–2023

Sahra Altı Afrika Ülkelerinde Ekonomik Büyümenin Belirleyicileri: 1990–2023 Dönemi Panel Veri Analizi

Mehmet Uçar(NEVŞEHİR HACI BEKTAŞ VELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6078-7536
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings of the causality test indicate that there is a bidirectional causal relationship between growth and physical capital and population growth.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the effects of physical capital, financial development, workers remittances, labor and population growth on economic growth in 18 Sub-Saharan African countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The analysis period consists of annual data from 1990 to 2023.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings of the causality test indicate that there is a bidirectional causal relationship between growth and physical capital and population growth.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Physical capital · economic growth · financial development

Abstract

This study examines the effects of physical capital, financial development, workers remittances, labor and population growth on economic growth in 18 Sub-Saharan African countries. The analysis period consists of annual data from 1990 to 2023. The AMG estimator was used as the main estimator, while the CCEMG estimator was utilized as the control estimator. Additionally, the causal relationship between the variables and economic growth, as well as the direction of causality, was examined. The causal relationship was analyzed using the Dumitrescu-Hurlin (2012) test. The CCEMG estimator produces results at both the panel and cross-sectional levels. In this context, it was observed that the findings differed significantly at both the panel and individual level. It is noteworthy that physical capital and labor are the most influential variables on growth across the countries. This suggests that policies to be implemented should be tailored to the specific characteristics of each country. The findings of the causality test indicate that there is a bidirectional causal relationship between growth and physical capital and population growth.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Sahra Altı Afrika’daki 18 ülkede fiziksel sermaye, finansal kalkınma, işçi havaleleri, işgücü ve nüfus artışının ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. Analiz dönemi, 1990–2023 yıllarına ait yıllık verilerden oluşmaktadır. Çalışmada ana tahminleyici olarak AMG tahminleyicisi, kontrol tahminleyicisi olarak ise CCEMG tahminleyicisi kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca değişkenler ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi ve nedenselliğin yönü incelenmiştir. Nedensellik analizi Dumitrescu-Hurlin (2012) testi kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. CCEMG tahminleyicisi hem panel hem de ülke düzeyinde sonuçlar üretmektedir. Bu bağlamda, bulguların panel ve ülke düzeyinde önemli farklılıklar gösterdiği tespit edilmiştir. Fiziksel sermaye ve işgücünün ülkeler genelinde ekonomik büyüme üzerinde en etkili değişkenler olduğu dikkat çekmektedir. Bu durum, uygulanacak politikaların ülkelerin kendine özgü yapısal özelliklerine göre şekillendirilmesi gerektiğini göstermektedir. Nedensellik testi sonuçları ise ekonomik büyüme ile fiziksel sermaye ve nüfus artışı arasında çift yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi bulunduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Uçar, M. (2026). Determinants of Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan African Countries: Panel Data Analysis for the Period 1990–2023. International Econometric Review, Volume: 18 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.33818/ier.1828750

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (56)

  1. Adeleye, B. N., I. Bengana, A. Boukhelkhal, M. M. Shafiq and H. K. Abdulkareem (2022). Does human capital tilt the population-economic growth dynamics? Evidence from Middle East and North African countries. Social Indicators Research, 162 (2), 863-883.
  2. Agbolosoo, J. A., F. Septya and M. P. Hutagoal (2025). Indonesia's Economic Growth: Role of Human Capital, Physical Capital, and Social Infrastructure. Management of Sustainable Development, 17 (1).
  3. Altiner, A. and Y. Toktas (2017). Relationship between human capital and economic growth: An application to developing countries. Eurasian journal of Economics and Finance, 5 (3), 87-98.
  4. Anyanwu, J. C. (2014). Factors affecting economic growth in Africa: are there any lessons from China? African Development Review, 26 (3), 468-493.
  5. Asad, S., N. Bibi and S. Akhtar (2023). Human capital, physical capital, and economic growth nexus: A descriptive analysis. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 5 (04), 38-43.
  6. Azizi, S., A. Aftabi, M. Azizkhani and K. Yektansani (2024). Remittances and economic growth: a blessing for middle-income countries, ineffective for low-income countries. Journal of Economic Studies, 51 (6), 1285-1303.
  7. Bado, B., I. Irwandi and Y. Karmila (2023). The effect of education, poverty, and population growth on economic growth in South Sulawesi in 2010-2022. Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (FJMR), 2 (5), 1047-1062.
  8. Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (2), 407-443.
  9. Breusch, T. S. and A. R. Pagan (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47 (1), 239-253.
  10. Brida, J. G., E. Alvarez, G. Cayssials and M. Mednik (2024). How does population growth affect economic growth and vice versa? An empirical analysis. Review of Economics and Political Science, 9 (3), 265-297.
  11. Bucevska, V. (2022). Impact of remittances on economic growth: Empirical evidence from South-East European countries. The South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 17 (1), 79-94.
  12. Bunyamin, F. (2022). The Impact of Physical Capital and Human Capital on Growth in Indonesia, 1970–2017. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan, 30 (2), 115-130.
  13. Chaudhary, S. K. (2022). Remittances economic growth and investment nexus: Evidence from Nepal. NRB Economic Review, 34 (1), 1-23.
  14. Cheng, C.-Y., M.-S. Chien and C.-C. Lee (2021). ICT diffusion, financial development, and economic growth: An international cross-country analysis. Economic Modelling, 94, 662-671.
  15. Demirguc-Kunt, A., M. S. Martinez Peria and R. Aggarwal (2006). Do workers' remittances promote financial development?
  16. Dumitrescu, E. I., and C. Hurlin (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460.
  17. Eberhardt, M. (2012). Estimating panel time-series models with heterogeneous slopes. The Stata Journal, 12(1), 61-71.
  18. Eberhardt, M. and F. Teal (2010). Productivity Analysis in Global Manufacturing Production.
  19. Eberhardt, M. and S. Bond (2009). Cross-section dependence in nonstationary panel models: a novel estimator.
  20. Elfaki, K. E., R. D. Handoyo and K. H. Ibrahim (2021). The impact of industrialization, trade openness, financial development, and energy consumption on economic growth in Indonesia. Economies, 9 (4), 174.
  21. Glytsos, N. P. (2002). The role of migrant remittances in development: Evidence from Mediterranean countries. International Migration, 40 (1), 5-26.
  22. Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 424-438.
  23. Hacıimamoğlu, T. and O. Sungur (2024). Human capital, physical capital, economic complexity, and economic growth nexus in Türkiye: New evidence from bootstrap fourier granger causality in quantiles approach. İnsan ve İnsan, 11 (37), 11-26.
  24. Ishfaq, M., A. Rasool, M. M. Asghar, S. Karim and R. Ahmad (2024). Impact of Natural, Physical and Human Capital Formation on Economic Growth in Pakistan: An ARDL Analysis. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 13 (3), 222-233.
  25. Islam, M. S. (2022). Do personal remittances influence economic growth in South Asia? A panel analysis. Review of Development Economics, 26 (1), 242-258.
  26. Islam, M. S. and I. A. Alhamad (2023). Do personal remittance outflows impede economic growth in Saudi Arabia? The role of trade, labor force, human, and physical capital. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10 (1), 1-9.
  27. Jan, M., S. Ullah and M. Ahmed (2021). The impact of population on economic growth evidence from Paki-Stan. Pakistan Journal of International Affairs, 4 (3), 195-207.
  28. Khan, I., F. Hou, M. Irfan, A. Zakari and H. P. Le (2021). Does energy trilemma a driver of economic growth? The roles of energy use, population growth, and financial development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 146, 111157.
  29. Le, H. P. (2020). The energy-growth nexus revisited: the role of financial development, institutions, government expenditure and trade openness. Heliyon, 6 (7).
  30. Levine, R. (1997). Financial development and economic growth: views and agenda. Journal of Economic Literature, 35 (2), 688-726.
  31. Levine, R. (2005). Finance and growth: theory and evidence. Handbook of Economic Growth, 1, 865-934.
  32. Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22 (1), 3-42.
  33. Mahi, M., S. W. Phoong, I. Ismail and C. R. Isa (2019). Energy–finance–growth nexus in ASEAN-5 countries: An ARDL bounds test approach. Sustainability, 12 (1), 5.
  34. Malthus, T. (1798). An essay on the principle of population: London: J. Johnson.
  35. Okoye, L. U., A. Omankhanlen, J. I. Okoh, U. E. Okorie, F. N. Ezeji, B. Ehikioya and G. K. Ezu (2021). Effect of energy utilization and financial development on economic growth in Nigeria. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11 (2), 392-401.
  36. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels: CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1229; IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240.
  37. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22 (2), 265-312.
  38. Pesaran, M. H. 2006. Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74: 967–1012.
  39. Pesaran, M. H. and T. Yamagata (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142 (1), 50-93.
  40. Pomi, S. S., S. M. Sarkar and B. K. Dhar (2021). Human or physical capital, which influences sustainable economic growth most? A study on Bangladesh. Canadian Journal of Business and Information Studies, 3 (5), 101-108.
  41. Rao, B. B. and G. M. Hassan (2012). Are the direct and indirect growth impacts of remittances significant? The World Economy, 35 (3), 351-372.
  42. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94 (5), 1002-1037.
  43. Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  44. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development, translated by redvers opie: Harvard University Press.
  45. Shahbaz, M., S. Khan and M I Tahir (2013). The dynamic links between energy consumption, economic growth, financial development and trade in China: fresh evidence from multivariate framework analysis. Energy Economics, 40, 8-21.
  46. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70 (1), 65-94.
  47. Swamy, P. A. (1970). Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica, 38 (2), 311-323.
  48. Tchekoumi, L. B. and P. D. Nya (2023). Remittances and economic growth: What lessons for the CEMAC zone? Cogent Economics & Finance, 11 (1), 2191448.
  49. Ur Rehman, N. and E. Hysa (2021). The effect of financial development and remittances on economic growth. Cogent Economics & Finance, 9 (1), 1932060.
  50. Usman, M., A. Jahanger, M. S. A. Makhdum, D. Balsalobre-Lorente and A. Bashir (2022). How do financial development, energy consumption, natural resources, and globalization affect Arctic countries' economic growth and environmental quality? An advanced panel data simulation. Energy, 241, 122515.
  51. Verma, A., P. S. Dandgawhal and A. K. Giri (2023). Impact of ICT diffusion and financial development on economic growth in developing countries. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 28 (55), 27-43.
  52. Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of applied econometrics, 23(2), 193-233.
  53. Wu, K. and M. Wu (2022). Positive Influence of Regulated Human Capital Accumulation on Economic Growth: A Theoretical Model. Economics, 11 (1), 1-8.
  54. Zahoor, Z., I. Khan and F. Hou (2022). Clean energy investment and financial development as determinants of environment and sustainable economic growth: evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (11), 16006-16016.
  55. Zaidi, S. A. H., Z. Wei, A. Gedikli, M. W. Zafar, F. Hou and Y. Iftikhar (2019). The impact of globalization, natural resources abundance, and human capital on financial development: Evidence from thirty-one OECD countries. Resources policy, 64, 101476.
  56. Zhang, J.and H. Lei (2014). Financial structure, productivity, and risk of foreign direct investment. Journal of Comparative Economics, 42 (3), 652-669.