SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Aurum Journal of Health Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions by Tunnel Technique and Acellular Dermal Matrix Graft: A Case Report

İlknur ÖZENCİ
Şebnem DİRİKAN İPÇİ
Gökser ÇAKAR
Selçuk YILMAZ
Pages
1–9
Publication Date
2018-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the present clinical case, Miller Class III multiple gingivalrecessions can be predictably treated with TUN+ADM, if the attachment loss is not too severe.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract: Successful clinical outcomes have been achieved with various root coverage procedures for the treatmentof Miller Class I and II multiple gingival recessions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Regarding Miller Class III recessions, unpredictable success ratewas reported due to the loss of interproximal tissue support.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the present clinical case, Miller Class III multiple gingivalrecessions can be predictably treated with TUN+ADM, if the attachment loss is not too severe.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Acellular dermal matrix graft · Multiple gingival recessions · Tunnel technique

Abstract

Abstract: Successful clinical outcomes have been achieved with various root coverage procedures for the treatmentof Miller Class I and II multiple gingival recessions. Regarding Miller Class III recessions, unpredictable success ratewas reported due to the loss of interproximal tissue support. Recently, it has been demonstrated that complete rootcoverage is possible in Miller Class III defects, when the defects present mild interdental attachment loss. This casereport describes the application of acellular dermal matrix graft (ADM) and tunnel technique (TUN) combination,for the treatment of Miller Class III multiple gingival recession defects. At 12-month, complete root coverage onteeth #41 and partial root coverage on teeth #31 with mean root coverage of 83.3% were achieved. Root coverageesthetic score was 7 with successful esthetic results. Besides significant defect coverage increase in keratinized tissueheight and gingival thickness were obtained. According to the present clinical case, Miller Class III multiple gingivalrecessions can be predictably treated with TUN+ADM, if the attachment loss is not too severe.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZENCİ, İ., İPÇİ, Ş. D., ÇAKAR, G., YILMAZ, S. (2018). Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions by Tunnel Technique and Acellular Dermal Matrix Graft: A Case Report. Aurum Journal of Health Sciences, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 1–9. https://ajindex.com/articles/825993

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ahmedbeyli, C., Ipçi, Ş. D., Cakar, G., Kuru, B. E., & Yılmaz, S. (2014). Clinical evaluation of coronally advanced flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft on complete defect coverage for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions with thin tissue biotype. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 41(3), 303–310.
  2. American Academy of Periodontology. (1996). Consensus report on mucogingival therapy. Proceedings of the World Workshop in Periodontics. Annals of Periodontology, 1(1), 702–706.
  3. Aroca, S., Keglevich, T., Nikolidakis, D., Gera, I., Nagy, K., Azzi, R., & Etienne, D. (2010a). Treatment of class III multiple gingival recessions: a randomized-clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 37(1), 88–97.
  4. Aroca, S., Keglevich, T., Nikolidakis, D., Gera, I., Nagy, K., Azzi, R., & Etienne, D. (2010b). Treatment of class III multiple gingival recessions: a randomized-clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 37(1), 88–97.
  5. Aroca, S., Molnár, B., Windisch, P., Gera, I., Salvi, G. E., Nikolidakis, D., & Sculean, A. (2013). Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and II gingival recessions with a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 40(7), 713–720.
  6. Baldi, C., Pini-Prato, G., Pagliaro, U., Nieri, M., Saletta, D., Muzzi, L., & Cortellini, P. (1999). Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Is flap thickness a relevant predictor to achieve root coverage? A 19- case series. Journal of Periodontology, 70(9), 1077–1084.
  7. Cairo, F. (2017). Periodontal plastic surgery of gingival recessions at single and multiple teeth. Periodontology 2000, 75(1), 296–316.
  8. Cairo, F., Rotundo, R., Miller, P. D., & Pini Prato, G. P. (2009). Root coverage esthetic score: a system to evaluate the esthetic outcome of the treatment of gingival recession through evaluation of clinical cases. Journal of Periodontology, 80(4), 705–710.
  9. Cortellini, P., & Pini Prato, G. (2012). Coronally advanced flap and combination therapy for root coverage. Clinical strategies based on scientific evidence and clinical experience. Periodontology 2000, 59(1), 158–184.
  10. Esteibar, J. R. V., Zorzano, L. A. A., Cundín, E. E., Blanco, J. D. M., & Medina, J. R. O. de G. (2011). Complete root coverage of Miller Class III recessions. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 31(4), e1-7. Felipe, M. E. M. C., An