Journals / Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 37

IMPRESSIONS ON CLOTHING AND EVALUATIONS FOR CONSUMPTION DECISIONS: A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Giyim Tercihlerinin İzlenim Oluşturma Ve Tüketim Kararlarına Etkisi

Pages
521–547
Publication Date
2020-07-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides, the impressions made on clothing are used to make inferences about demographic characteristics as well as other consumption decisions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the clothing preferences on the impressions and the role of these impressions in the evaluations of the characteristics of the individuals and consumption patterns.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By using in-depth interviews and image interpretation technique which is one of the projective techniques, interviews with 6 interviewers is conducted for an average of 30 minutes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides, the impressions made on clothing are used to make inferences about demographic characteristics as well as other consumption decisions.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İzlenim · tüketim · kıyafet

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the clothing preferences on the impressions and the role of these impressions in the evaluations of the characteristics of the individuals and consumption patterns. A qualitative research has been designed towards this purpose. By using in-depth interviews and image interpretation technique which is one of the projective techniques, interviews with 6 interviewers is conducted for an average of 30 minutes. A semi-structured interview form is used during interviews. In the photographs, a male and female model is used with hidden faces, dressed in a business casual dress code. The findings show that there is a belief that the impression is made on clothes but these impression is not definite in general. Besides, the impressions made on clothing are used to make inferences about demographic characteristics as well as other consumption decisions.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı giyim tercihlerinin izlenimler üzerindeki etkisi ve bu izlenimlerin bireylerin özellikleri ve tüketim kalıplarına ilişkin değerlendirmelerdeki rolünü tespit etmektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda nitel bir araştırma tasarlanmıştır. Bir kadın ve bir erkeğin fotoğrafları gösterilmiş ve 6 görüşmeci ile derinlemesine mülakat ve projektif tekniklerden olan resim yorumlama tekniği kullanılarak ortalama 30 dakika süren görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Görüşmelerde yarı yapılandırılmış mülakat formundan faydalanılmıştır. Fotoğraflarda iş yerine uygun rahat giyim (business casual) koduna uygun giyinen modeller, yüzleri gizlenerek kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre kıyafetler üzerinden izlenim oluşturulmaktadır ancak bu izlenimlerin genelde kesin olmadığına ilişkin bir inanç mevcuttur. Ayrıca kıyafetler üzerinden oluşturulan izlenimlerin demografik özelliklerin yanında diğer tüketim kararlarına dair çıkarımlar yapmakta kullanıldığı da çalışmanın sonuçları arasında yer almaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MARANGOZ, M., AYDIN, A. E., ÖZKOÇ, H. H. (2020). IMPRESSIONS ON CLOTHING AND EVALUATIONS FOR CONSUMPTION DECISIONS: A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 37, 521–547. https://ajindex.com/articles/82506

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Adotey, A., J., Pongo, A., N. ve Obinnim, E. (2016). The Relationship Between Clothes and First Impressions: Benefits and Adverse Effects on the Individual, International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies, 3 (12), 229-234.
  2. Bal, H. (2016). Nitel Araştırma Yöntem ve Teknikleri – Uygulamalı Örnekli, İstanbul:
  3. Sentez Yayınları.
  4. Baran, J., S., Mok, J., J., Land, M. ve Kang, Y., T. (1989), You Are What You Buy: Mass-Mediated Judgments of People’s Worth, Journal of Communication, 39 (2), 46-54.
  5. Belk, W., R. (1981). Determinants of Consumption Cue Utilization in Impression Formation: An Association Derivation and Experimental Verification, Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 170-175.
  6. Burns, D., L. ve Lennon, J., S. (1993). Effect of Clothing on the Use of Person Information Categories in First Impressions, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12, 9-15.
  7. Burroughs, W., J., Drews, R., D., Hallman, W. (1991). Predicting Personality From Personal Possessions: A Self-Presentational Analysis, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6 (6), 147-163.
  8. Christopher, N., A. ve Schlenker, R., B. (2000). The Impact of Perceived Material Weakth and Perceiver Personality on First Impressions, Journal of Economic Pyschology, 21, 1-19.
  9. Erdoğan, S., Nahcivan, N. ve Esin, M., N. (2015).
  10. Hemşirelikte Araştırma, İstanbul:
  11. Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri. Feinberg, A., R., Mataro, L. ve Burroughs, W., J. (1992).
  12. Clothing and Social Identity, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 11, 18-23.
  13. Gille-Knauf, T., R. ve Mittag, R., M. (2008). Smart and Sexy? Major and Clothing’s Influence on Perceptions of Intelligence, UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research, 11, 1-9.
  14. Goffman, E. (2016).
  15. Günlük Yaşamda Benliğin Sunumu, İstanbul:
  16. Metis Yayınları.
  17. Gosling, D., S., Ko, J., S. ve Mannarelli, T. (2002). A Room With a Cue: Personality Judgments Based on Offices and Bedrooms, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 (3), 379-398.
  18. Holman, R., H. (1980). Clothing as Communication: An Empirical Investigation, Advances in Consumer Research, 7, 372-377.
  19. Howlett, N., Pine, K., Orakçıoğlu, İ., Fletcher, B. (2013). The Influence of Clothing on First Impressions, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 17 (1), 38-48.
  20. Johnson, K., P., K., Schofield, A., N. ve Yurchisin, J. (2002). Appearance and Dress as a Source of Information: A Qualitative Approach to Data Collection, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 20 (3), 125-137.
  21. Kang, M., Sklar, M. ve Johnson, K