Journals / Uygulamalı Ekonomi ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

NETWORK SCIENCE AND MODELS

AĞ BİLİMİ VE MODELLERİ

Pages
36–55
Publication Date
2020-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In order to determine these operating rules, network models have been developed, these models are also introduced in the study and the principles of the models are exhibited.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The roots of network science date back to the 17th century and its development accelerated with the researches made after the 1970s.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Networks continue to operate within a specific set of rules.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In order to determine these operating rules, network models have been developed, these models are also introduced in the study and the principles of the models are exhibited.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ağlar · Ağ Bilimi · Ağ Modelleri

Abstract

The roots of network science date back to the 17th century and its development accelerated with the researches made after the 1970s. There are networks in many areas around us, and the important thing is to identify, analyze, interpret and reveal implicit information. Therefore, it is important to know the networks. The main purpose of this study is to introduce networks and network science in detail and to discuss the historical development of network science in chronological terms. Networks continue to operate within a specific set of rules. In order to determine these operating rules, network models have been developed, these models are also introduced in the study and the principles of the models are exhibited.

Özet

Ağ biliminin kökleri 17. Yüzyıla dayanmakta olup, gelişimi 1970'lerden sonra yapılan araştırmalar ile hız kazanmıştır. Etrafımızda birçok alanda ağlar mevcut olup, önemli olan bunları tespit edip, analiz yapabilmek, yorumlayabilmek ve örtük bilgileri ortaya çıkarabilmektir. Bu nedenle ağları tanımak önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın en temel amacı, ağları ve ağ bilimini detaylı olarak tanıtabilmek ve ağ biliminin tarihsel gelişimini kronolojik açıdan ele almaktır. Ağlar belirli kurallar dizini içerisinde işleyişlerini sürdürmektedirler. Bu işleyiş kurallarını belirlemeye yönelik olarak da ağ modelleri geliştirilmiş olup, çalışmada ayrıca bu modeller tanıtılmış ve modellerin esasları sergilenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRAL, D. G. (2020). NETWORK SCIENCE AND MODELS. Uygulamalı Ekonomi ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 36–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/820957

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ağcasulu, Hülya. 2017. “Ağ Yaklaşımı ve Sosyal Sermaye Kuramı Perspektifinden Formel Örgütlerde İlişkiler: Belediye Meclisi Sosyal Ağ Analizi İncelemesi.” Doktora Tezi: Süleyman Demiral Üniversitesi,
  2. Isparta. Albert, Réka, Hawoong Jeong, and Albert-László Barabási. 1999. “Diameter of the World-Wide Web.” Nature 401: 130–31.
  3. Backstrom, Lars, Paolo Boldi, Marco Rosa, Johan Ugander, and Sebastiano Vigna. 2012. “Four Degrees of Separation.” In WebSci ’12: Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, 33–42. Barabási, A. L. 2003. Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means for Business, Science, and Everyday Life. Penguin Group, New York. Barabási, Albert-László. 2016. Network Science. Cambridge University Press. Barabási, Albert-László, and Réka Albert. 1999. “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks.” Science 286 (5439): 509–512. Barabási, Albert-László, and M. Pósfai. 2016. “The Scale Free Property.” In Network Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Barnes, J A. 1954. “Human Relations.” Human Relations 7: 39–58.
  5. Bollobas, Bela. 2001. Random Graphs. Cambridge University Press.
  6. Borgatti, Stephen P., Ajay Mehra, Daniel J. Brass, and Giuseppe Labianca. 2009. “Network Analysis in The Social Sciences.” Science 323: 892–895.
  7. Butts, Carter T. 2001. “The Complexity of Social Networks: Theoretical and Empirical Findings.” Social Networks 23: 31–71.
  8. Carvalho, Rui, Lubos Buzna, Flavio Bono, Eugenio Gutiérrez, Wolfram Just, and David Arrowsmith. 2009. “Robustness of Trans-European Gas Networks.” Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics. Coleman, James, Elihu Katz, and Herbert Menzel. 1957. “The Diffusion of an Innovation Among Physicians.” Socimetry 20 (4): 253–270. Erdӧs, Paul, and Alfréd Rėnyi. 1959. “On Random Graphs.” Publicationes Mathematicae 6: 290–297.
  9. Eteman, Fatma Sert, Necmi Gürsakal, and Selim Tüzüntürk. 2014. “NodeXL Ile Sosyal Ağ Analizi: # Akademikzam Örneği.” In 15. Uluslararası Ekonometri, Yöneylem Araştırmaları ve İstatistik Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, 464–482.
  10. Isparta. Freeman, Linton C., R. White Douglas, and Romney Kimball. 1989. Research Methods in Social Network Analysis. Fairfax: George Mason University Press.
  11. Freeman, Linton C. 2004. The Development of Social Network Analysis. Vancouver: Empirical Press.
  12. Gastner, M.T. 2011. Networks: Theory and Applications. Imperial College. Gell-Mann, Murray. 2002. What Is Complexity? Contributions to Economics. Physica-Verlag HD.