Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim Eğitim ve Ekonomik Perspektifler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

EXPORTS - GROWTH RELATIONSHIP IN TURKEY: An Empirical Analysis

TÜRKİYE’DE İHRACAT - BÜYÜME İLİŞKİSİ: AMPİRİK BİR ANALİZ

Pages
154–165
Publication Date
2020-12-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that bi-directional causality between exports and growth in the Turkish economy is valid.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Turkey abandoned the import substitution industrialization strategy and adopted export – led industrialization strategy in the context of the political decisions taken on January 24, 1980 and entered into a structural transformation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the last four decades, there have been significant changes in the economy, while some of the economic targets have been achieved within the framework of the January 24 decisions, some have not yet been achieved.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that bi-directional causality between exports and growth in the Turkish economy is valid.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İhracata dayalı büyüme · Türkiye ekonomisi · 24 Ocak kararları

Abstract

Turkey abandoned the import substitution industrialization strategy and adopted export – led industrialization strategy in the context of the political decisions taken on January 24, 1980 and entered into a structural transformation. In the last four decades, there have been significant changes in the economy, while some of the economic targets have been achieved within the framework of the January 24 decisions, some have not yet been achieved. In this study, the validity of export-led growth model and / or the degree of success are tested in the context of the Turkish economy. For this purpose, in addition to conventional causality analysis, recently developed time series analysis methods are used. These are bootstrap based Hacker and Hatemi J causality test, Hatemi J - Roca asymmetric causality test, frequency domain causality test developed by Breitung and Candelon and Bacılar et al. sliding windows causality test methods. The results indicate that bi-directional causality between exports and growth in the Turkish economy is valid.

Özet

Pek çok ülke gibi Türkiye’de de 24 Ocak 1980 tarihinde alınan karar ile ithal ikameci sanayileşme stratejisi terk edilerek, ihracata dayalı sanayileşme stratejisi benimsenmiş ve yapısal bir dönüşüm içerisine girilmiştir. Geçen kırk yıllık dönemde ekonomik yapıda önemli değişimler olmuş, iktisadi yapıda 24 Ocak kararları çerçevesinde ekonomik hedeflerden bazılarına ulaşılırken, bazılarına da henüz ulaşılamamıştır. Bu çalışmada ihracata dayalı büyüme modelinin geçerliliği ve başarı derecesi ile Türkiye ekonomisi için geçerli olup olmadığı test edilmektedir. Bu amaçla konvansiyonel nedensellik analizlerinin yanında son dönemde geliştirilen zaman serisi analiz metotları kullanılmaktadır. Bunlar; bootstrapa dayalı Hacker ve Hatemi J. Nedensellik Testi, Hatemi J. – Roca Asimetrik Nedensellik Testi, Breitung ve Candelon tarafından geliştirilen Frekans Alanı Nedensellik Testi ve Bacılar vd. tarafından geliştirilen Kayan Pencereler Nedensellik Testidir. Sonuçlar göstermektedir ki, Türkiye ekonomisinde ihracat ve büyüme arasında çift yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi bulunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ADIGÜZEL, U. (2020). EXPORTS - GROWTH RELATIONSHIP IN TURKEY: An Empirical Analysis. Uluslararası Yönetim Eğitim ve Ekonomik Perspektifler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 154–165. https://ajindex.com/articles/819687

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Abdulnasser, H ve I. Manuchehr, (2000). Time Series Evidence for Balassa’s Export-Led Growth Hypothesis. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 9:355-365.
  2. Alıcı, A.A ve Ucal, M. Ş. (2003).
  3. Foreign Direct Investment, Exports and Output Growth of Turkey: Causality Analysis. European Trade Study Group (ETSG) Fifth Annual Conference, (September), Madrid. Alimi, S. R. ve Muse, B.O. (2013), Export-Led Growth or Growth-Driven Exports? Evidence from Nigeria, British Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, Vol. 3, Isuue. 2, pp. 89-100.
  4. Aytaç, A. (2017). Ekonomik Büyüme – İhracat İlişkisi: 2001-2016 Türkiye Örneği. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırma Dergisi, 6 (4), 214-222.
  5. Balassa, B. (1978). Exports and economic growth: further evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 5, 181-9.
  6. Balcılar, M., Özdemir, Z. A., ve Arslantürk, Y. (2010). Economic growth and energy consumption causal nexus viewed through a bootstrap rolling window. Energy Economics, 32(6), 1398-1410.
  7. Bhagwati, J.N. (1988).
  8. Protectionism, MIT Press,
  9. Cambridge, Massachusetts. Biyase, M. ve Zwane, T. (2011). An Export-Led Growth (ELG) Paradigm in Africa: Panel Data Approach. ESSA 2011 Biennial Conference of the Economic Society of South Africa, 5-7 September 2011.
  10. Breitung, J. ve Candelon, B. (2006). Testing for short-and long-run causality: A frequency-domain approach. Journal of Econometrics, 132(2), 363-378.
  11. Doğanlar, M ve M. Fisunoğlu. (1999). Causality Between Exports and Economic Growth in Asian Countries. Yapı Kredi Economic Review, 10(11):3-11.
  12. Dickey, David and Wayne Fuller. 1979. Distribution Of The Estimators For Autoregressive Time Series With A Unit Root. Journal of The American Statistical Association, 74, ss:427- 431. Dickey, D. ve Wayne F. (1981). Likelihood Ratio Statistics For Autoregressive Time Series With A Unit Root. Econometrica, 49, ss:1057-72.
  13. Durmuş, A. (2007). Türkiye’de 1946’dan 2001 Yılına Kadar Uygulanmış Olan İstikrar Programlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Maltepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans tezi. Emery, R.F., (1967), The Relations of Exports and Economic Growth. Kyklos, 20 (2), 479-86.
  14. Esfahani, H.S. (1991).
  15. Exports, Imports, and Economic Growth in Semi-Industrialized Countries, Journal of Development Economics, 35(1):93-116.
  16. Hacker, S. ve Hatemi-J, A. (2005). A test for multivariate ARCH effects. Applied Economics Letters, 12 (7), 411-417.
  17. Hacker, S. ve Hatemi-J, A. (2006). “Tests for Causality Between Integrated Variables