Journals / Uluslararası Kriz ve Siyaset Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Revisiting the Environmental Security in Terms of Evolution Process

Pages
115–135
Publication Date
2022-05-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As environmental challenges are transboundary and no nation is not able to cope with all environmental problems alone, there is a requirement of global cooperative response to the environmental problems to prevent any interstate violent conflict ınduced by environmental security.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Environmental problems have been a growing human-induced challenge that intensively affect our life and our future.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although environmental concern had emerged earlier in the 1960s, the setting relations between environmental decline and security started in the 1980s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As environmental challenges are transboundary and no nation is not able to cope with all environmental problems alone, there is a requirement of global cooperative response to the environmental problems to prevent any interstate violent conflict ınduced by environmental security.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çevre güvenliği · kirlilik · kaynak kıtlığı

Abstract

Environmental problems have been a growing human-induced challenge that intensively affect our life and our future. Therefore, this paper aims at analyzing the evolution of environmental security with all aspects. Although environmental concern had emerged earlier in the 1960s, the setting relations between environmental decline and security started in the 1980s. Environmental decline like transboundary pollution and resource scarcity have been deemed to have undesirable impact on the security of states, communities and individuals. Environmental security suggests that environmental problems, notably resource scarcity and environmental decline can cause violent/conflict among states and communities. Therefore, environmental security has been deemed as part of national policy which securitizes environmental problems. As environmental challenges are transboundary and no nation is not able to cope with all environmental problems alone, there is a requirement of global cooperative response to the environmental problems to prevent any interstate violent conflict ınduced by environmental security.

Özet

Environmental problems have been a growing human-induced challenge that intensively affect our life and our future. Therefore, this paper aims at analyzing the evolution of environmental security. Although environmental concern had emerged earlier in the 1960s, the setting relations between environmental decline and security started in the 1980s. Environmental decline like transboundary pollution and resource scarcity have been deemed to have undesirable impact on the security of states, communities and individuals. Environmental security suggests that environmental problems, notably resource scarcity and environmental decline can cause violent/conflict among states and communities.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, S. (2022). Revisiting the Environmental Security in Terms of Evolution Process. Uluslararası Kriz ve Siyaset Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 115–135. https://ajindex.com/articles/817249

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. BAECHLER, Günther, Violence Through Environmental Discrimination: Causes, Rwanda Arena, and Conflict Model, London: Kluwer Academic Publishing, 1999.
  2. BRADEN, Allenby, Environmental Security: Concept and Implementation, International Political Science Review, 21(1), 2000, pp. 5–21.
  3. BRAUCH, Hans Günter, Environment and Human Security, InterSecTions ‘Interdisciplinary Security ConnecTions, Publication Series of UNU-EHS, 2, 2005.
  4. BRAUCH, Hans Günter, Security and Environment Linkages in the Mediterranean: Three Phases of Research on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, Hans Günter Brauch et al.(Eds.), Security and Environment in the Mediterranean. Conceptualising Security and Environmental Conflicts, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 2003, pp. 35-143.
  5. BUZAN, Barry, “The English School: A Neglected Approach to International Security Studies”, Security Dialogue, 46(2), 2015, pp. 126-143.
  6. BUZAN, Barry, Ole Wæver and Jaap de Wilde, Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner, 1998.
  7. CONCA, Ken and Geoffrey D Dabelko, Environmental peacemaking, Washington, D.C: Woodrow Wilson Center Press; Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002.
  8. CUDWORTH, Erika and Stephen Hobden, Beyond environmental security: complex systems, multiple inequalities and environmental risks, Environmental Politics, 20(1), 2011, pp. 42-59, DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2011.538165. DALBY, Simon, Climate Change, The RUSI Journal, 158(3), 2013, pp. 34-43, p. 33, DOI: 10.1080/03071847.2013.807583. DALBY, Simon, Environmental security, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. 2002.
  9. De Groot, Rudolf, M. A. Wilson and J. Boumans, A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services, Ecological Economics, 41, 2002, pp. 393–408.
  10. DELIGIANNIS, Tom, Moving towards consensus, in Rita Floyd and Richard A. Matthew (Edt), Environmental Security Approaches and issues, London and New York, Rutledge, 2013, pp. 36-63.
  11. DEMİR, Sertif - Muzaffer Ercan YILMAZ, An Analysis of the Impact of the Syrian Crisis on Turkey’s Politic-Military, Social and Economic Security, Gazi Akademik Bakış, 13(26), 2020, pp. 1-19.
  12. DETRAZ, Nicole, Environmental security and gender: necessary shifts in an evolving debate. Security Studies, 18(2), 2009, pp. 345–369.
  13. DEUDNEY, Daniel, The Case Against Linking Environmental Degradation and National Security, Millennium, 19(3), 1990; pp. 461-476. doi:10.1177/03058298900190031001. DYER, Hugh, Green Theory, S. McGlinchey