Journals / Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Sayı: 2

Cementation in Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses

İmplant Destekli Sabit Protezlerde Simantasyon

Pages
71–80
Publication Date
2018-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, the purpose of our study is to provide contemporary and comprehensive knowledge about the luting agents and cementation procedures of implant supported fixed prostheses

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Contemporarily, implant supported applications are one of the commonly used treatment options in order to replace the missing teeth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since 1990’s, as the implant manufacturer’s has introduced abutments that are compatible with the cement-retained restorations, these restorations are used more than the screw-retained restorations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, the purpose of our study is to provide contemporary and comprehensive knowledge about the luting agents and cementation procedures of implant supported fixed prostheses
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İmplant · Sabit protez · Simanlar

Abstract

Contemporarily, implant supported applications are one of the commonly used treatment options in order to replace the missing teeth. The restorations used in implant supported fixed prostheses have two types, such as cement-retained and screw-retained restorations. Since 1990’s, as the implant manufacturer’s has introduced abutments that are compatible with the cement-retained restorations, these restorations are used more than the screw-retained restorations. Obtaining retention in cement-retained restoration plays significant role in the long-term service of the implant supported prostheses. Luting agents are dental materials that provide retention of the restoration temporarily or permanently. Although these materials are used for both the cementation of tooth and implant supported fixed restorations, there are somennm differences between them in terms of the luting agent selection and cementation principles. It is of utmost importance that clinician should be aware of these differences and consider them important during cementation in order to provide long-term success without any biological and mechanical complications. Therefore, the purpose of our study is to provide contemporary and comprehensive knowledge about the luting agents and cementation procedures of implant supported fixed prostheses

Özet

Günümüzde implant destekli sabit protezler eksik dişlerin yerine koyulması için yaygın olarak uygulanan tedavi seçeneklerindendir. İmplant destekli sabit protezlerde uygulanan restorasyonlar, siman ve vida retansiyonlu olmak üzere iki tiptedir. 1990’lı yıllardan sonra implant firmalarının siman retansiyonlu üst yapılara uygun abutment üretmesi ile bu tip üst yapılar vidalı sistemlere göre daha fazla kullanılmaktadır. Siman retansiyonlu üst yapılarda retansiyonun sağlanması, implant destekli protezlerin uzun süreli fonksiyonunda önemli rol oynar. Yapıştırıcı ajanlar, sabit protezlerin simantasyonunda kullanılan ve restorasyonun retansiyonunu geçici veya daimi olarak sağlayan dental materyallerdir. Bu materyaller, hem diş destekli hem de implant destekli protezlerde rutin olarak kullanılmasına rağmen her iki protez tipi arasında siman seçimi ve simantasyon prensipleri açısından çeşitli farklar mevcuttur. Bu farkların hekim tarafından bilinmesi ve implant destekli sabit protezlerin yapıştırılması esnasında dikkate alınması restorasyonların biyolojik ve mekanik komplikasyonlar oluşmadan başarılı şekilde kullanılmalarını sağlar. Bu nedenle çalışmamızda, implant destekli sabit protez uygulamalarında kullanılan simanlar ve simantasyon prensipleri ile ilgili güncel ve kapsamlı bilgi verilmesi amaçlanmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ASAR, N. V., KIRMAN, E. A. (2018). Cementation in Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses. Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi, Sayı: 2, 71–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/815720

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Wadhwani C, Schwedhelm ER, Tarica DY, Chung K-H. Implant Luting Cements. In: Wadhwani C, editor. Cementation in Dental Implantology. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag; 2015. 47–83
  2. Wittneben J, Millen C, Bragger U. Clinical performance of screw- versus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions-a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 84–98
  3. Chaar M, Att W, Strub J. Prosthetic outcome of cementretained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2011; 38(9): 697–711
  4. Misch CE, Bidez MW. Simante Sabit İmplant Protezlerde Protetik Prensipler. In: Kutay Ö, editör. Dental implant protezler. İstanbul, Nobel Tıp Kitapevi; 2009. 414–451
  5. Dumbrigue HB, Abanomi AA, Cheng LL. Techniques to minimize excess luting agent in cement-retained implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87(1): 112–114
  6. Lemos CAA, De Souza Batista VE, Almeida DADF, Santiago Júnior JF, Verri FR, Pellizzer EP. Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115(4): 419–427
  7. Singh R, Mahesh L, Shukla S. Extra oral cementation of implant prosthesis: A case report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2013; 13(4): 627–630
  8. Wadhwani C, Piñeyro A. Technique for controlling the cement for an implant crown. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 102(1): 57–8
  9. Şen D. Simantasyon Tanımı. In: Şen D, editör. Simantasyon. İstanbul, Quintessence Publishing, Co., Ltd.; 2011. 3–6
  10. Şen D. İmplant Üstü Sabit Restorasyonların Simantasyonu. In: Şen D, editör. Simantasyon. İstanbul: Quintessence Publishing,Co.,Ltd.; 2011. 111–117
  11. Chee W, Jivraj S. Screw versus cemented implant supported restorations. Br Dent J 2006; 201(8): 501–507
  12. Kenneth SH, Reena CG. Cement-retained versus screwretained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77: 28–35
  13. Michalakis KX, Pissiotis AL, Hirayama H. Cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15(4): 545–549
  14. Jorgensen K. The relationship between retention and convergence angle in cemented veneer crowns. Acta Odontogica Scand 1955; 13: 35–40
  15. Kenneth H, Reena GC. Cement-retained versus screwretained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Den