SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye İnsan Hakları ve Eşitlik Kurumu Akademik Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 6

System For The Protection Of Socioeconomic Rights In Domestic Law: A Comparative Analysis Of Ethiopian And Turkish Human Rights Systems

İç Hukukta Sosyoekonomik Hakların Korunması Sistemi: Etiyopya ve Türk İnsan Hakları Sistemlerinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Biruk PAULOS
Seydi ÇELIK
Pages
63–100
Publication Date
2021-01-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Accordingly, using the minimum international standards set by human rights instruments as a unit of comparison, this article strives to comparatively analyze the Ethiopian and Turkish systems for the protection of SER at their national jurisdictions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) requires states party to adopt all mechanisms, within the limits of their available resources, particularly legislative and institutional measures, for the progressive and full realization of Socio-economic Rights (SER) at national level.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this end, states party to the Covenant have taken various measures to give effective domestic legal protection to SER.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Accordingly, using the minimum international standards set by human rights instruments as a unit of comparison, this article strives to comparatively analyze the Ethiopian and Turkish systems for the protection of SER at their national jurisdictions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Etiyopya · İnsan Hakları · Sosyoekonomik Hakların Korunması

Abstract

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) requires states party to adopt all mechanisms, within the limits of their available resources, particularly legislative and institutional measures, for the progressive and full realization of Socio-economic Rights (SER) at national level. To this end, states party to the Covenant have taken various measures to give effective domestic legal protection to SER. However, SER customarily lack full protection and proper enforcement mechanisms at national legal systems. Ethiopia and Turkey, being parties to the CESCR, have protected SER in their respective domestic laws. Accordingly, using the minimum international standards set by human rights instruments as a unit of comparison, this article strives to comparatively analyze the Ethiopian and Turkish systems for the protection of SER at their national jurisdictions.

Özet

Ekonomik, Sosyal ve Kültürel Haklar Uluslararası Sözleşmesi (CESCR), taraf devletlerden sosyoekonomik hakların ulusal düzeyde tam olarak gerçekleşmesi için tüm mekanizmaları, özellikle yasal ve kurumsal önlemleri benimsemelerini, mevcut kaynakları dâhilinde gerektirir. Bu amaçla Sözleşmeye taraf olan devletler, sosyoekonomik haklara etkili iç hukuksal koruma sağlamak için çeşitli tedbirler almıştır. Bununla birlikte sosyoekonomik haklar, ulusal yasal sistemlerde geleneksel olarak tam koruma ve uygun uygulama mekanizmalarından yoksundur. CESCR’a taraf olan Etiyopya ve Türkiye, kendi iç hukuklarında sosyoekonomik hakları korumuşlardır. Buna göre, insan hakları enstrümanları tarafından belirlenen asgari uluslararası standartları bir karşılaştırma birimi olarak kullanan bu makale, Etiyopya ve Türk sistemlerini ulusal yargı alanlarında sosyoekonomik hakların korunması açısından karşılaştırmalı olarak analiz etmeye çalışmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

PAULOS, B., ÇELIK, S. (2021). System For The Protection Of Socioeconomic Rights In Domestic Law: A Comparative Analysis Of Ethiopian And Turkish Human Rights Systems. Türkiye İnsan Hakları ve Eşitlik Kurumu Akademik Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 6, 63–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/812486

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akbulut, O. (2015). Turkey's Reaction to the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Thought, 5(2), 75–86.
  2. Algan, B. (2007).
  3. Protection of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Ankara:
  4. Seçkin Publishing. Bindman, E. (2018). Social Rights in Russia: From Imperfect Past to Uncertain Future. 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017: Routledge. Birhane, F. T. (2018). Justiciability of Socio-Economic Rights in Ethiopia: Exploring Conceptual Foundations and Assessing the FDRE Constitution and Judicial Perspective. Beijing Law Review, 322-344.
  5. Boyle, K. (2018, November). Models of Incorporation and Justiciability for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The Scottish Human Rights Commission. Çakar, A. S. (2018). Realization of Social Rights. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Izmit, Kocaeli Province, Turkey: Kocaeli University, Institute of Social Science, Department of Public Law. Çali, S. M.-G. (2006). The Legalization of Human Rights: Multidisciplinary perspectives on human rights and human rights law. New York, USA: Routledge. ÇAMUR, E. G. (2017). Civil and Political Rights vs. Social and Economic Rights: A Brief Overview. Journal of Bitlis Eren University Institute of Social Sciences, 6(1), 205-214.
  6. Casier, M. (2009). Contesting the ‘Truth’ of Turkey’s Human Rights Situation: State-Association Interactions in and outside the Southeast. European Journal of Turkish Studies. Retrieved December 9, 2019, from https://journals.openedition.org/ejts/4190
  7. Castermans-Holleman, M. C. (2009).
  8. The Protection of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights within the UN Framework. Netherlands International Law Review, 42(3), pp 353-373. Center for Economic and Social Rights. (2015). Twenty Years of Economic and Social Rights Advocacy: Marking the twin anniversaries of CESR and the Vienna Declaration and Program of Action. Cistelecan, A. S. (2011). Wronging Rights? Philosophical Challenges for Human Rights. New Delhi: Routledge. Council of Europe. (2019). European Social Charter and European Convention on Human Rights. Retrieved from European Social Charter: https://www.coe.int/en/web/european-social-charter/-european-social-charter-and-european-convention-on-human-rights
  9. Dean, H. (2015). Social Rights and Human Welfare. 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017: Routledge. DUVAN, A. Ö. (2015). The Judicial Application of Human Rights Law in Turkey. CHKD, Cilt, 1-15.
  10. Eatwell, T. (2018, December). State Responsibilty for Human Rights Violatio