Journals / The Literacy Trek / 2022 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Bringing lecturing back to life: An interactive perspective into university literature classes

Pages
1–30
Publication Date
2022-06-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper thus offers an insight into the interactive lectures and techniques used to make teaching more interactive and cooperative in content-based classrooms, which would potentially be beneficial for lecturers to develop an awareness of their interactional habits and language alternation practices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Lecturing is often seen as an outdated and tedious mode of teaching in university education due to its monologue-style content delivery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This strategy allows participants to interact and cooperate more equally, which levels the power asymmetry between lecturer and students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper thus offers an insight into the interactive lectures and techniques used to make teaching more interactive and cooperative in content-based classrooms, which would potentially be beneficial for lecturers to develop an awareness of their interactional habits and language alternation practices.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Interactive lectures · content-based classroom · higher education

Abstract

Lecturing is often seen as an outdated and tedious mode of teaching in university education due to its monologue-style content delivery. However, some lecturers tend to embrace a more interactive approach to ensure a democratic and participatory learning environment, in which students are encouraged to contribute to discussions, problem-solving or critical thinking tasks. This strategy allows participants to interact and cooperate more equally, which levels the power asymmetry between lecturer and students. In the light of this discussion, the data for this study was collected through audio recordings, interviews, observations, and field notes in the English Language and Literature Department at a state university in Turkey. Seven teaching hours were audio-recorded and transcribed with Jeffersonian transcription codes (1984) for an in-depth conversation analysis of classroom lecturer-student and student-student interaction. The data along with complementary information from interviews and notes were also used to identify the interactional architecture of academic lectures. Representative extracts are provided to illustrate how the strategies are put into use and presented in the interaction. This paper thus offers an insight into the interactive lectures and techniques used to make teaching more interactive and cooperative in content-based classrooms, which would potentially be beneficial for lecturers to develop an awareness of their interactional habits and language alternation practices.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAVAK, V. İ., KIRKGÖZ, Y. (2022). Bringing lecturing back to life: An interactive perspective into university literature classes. The Literacy Trek, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 1–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/806902

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Airey, J. (2012). I don’t teach language. The linguistic attitudes of physics lecturers in Sweden. AILA Review, 25(25), 64-79.
  2. Alfonzetti, G. (1998). The conversational dimension in code-switching between Italian and dialect in Sicily. In P. Auer (Ed.), Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction, and identity, (pp. 180-214), Routledge. Alcaraz Varó, E. (2000). El inglés profesional y academic. Alianza Editorial, Madrid. Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. M. (1991).
  3. Focus on the language classroom, Cambridge University Press.
  4. Auer, P. (1984)
  5. Bilingual conversation, John Benjamins. Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism, Multilingual Matters. Basturkmen, H., & Shackleford, N. (2015). How content lecturers help students with language: An observational study of language-related episodes in interaction in first year accounting classrooms. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 87-97.
  6. Ben-Naim, D. (2012). University lectures are a legacy of our pre-digital past. The Sydney Morning Herald. Beard, R. M., & Hartley, J. (1984). Teaching and learning in higher education. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Train-the-trainers: Implementing outcomes-based teaching and learning in Malaysian higher education. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 8, 1-19.
  7. Bligh, D. A. (1971). What’s the use of lectures? Penguin Education. Butler, J. A. (1992). Use of teaching methods within the lecture format. Medical teacher, 14(1), 11-25.
  8. Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2017). Minority languages and sustainable translanguaging: Threat or opportunity? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(10), 901-912.
  9. Charlton, B.G. (2006). Lectures are such an effective teaching method because they exploit evolved human psychology to improve learning. Medical Hypotheses, 67, 1261-5.
  10. Charlton, B., Marsh, S. & Gurski, N. (2015). Are Lectures the Best Way to Teach Students? The Guardian, Higher Education Network. March 31. Accessed October 26, 2020. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2015/mar/31/are-lectures-the-best-way-to-teach-students
  11. Clark, G. L. (2014). Roepke lecture in economic geography—financial literacy in context. Economic Geography, 90(1), 1-23.
  12. Coleman, J. (2006). English-medium teaching in European higher education. Language Teaching 39(1), 1–14.
  13. Cowling, M., & Brack, C. (2015). Let’s not abandon the humble Lecture theatre quite yet. The Conversation, July 15. Accessed October 26, 2020. Available at https://theco