SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Literacy Trek / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 1

Vocabulary Teaching Beliefs and Student Strategy Use in EFL: A Mixed-Methods Study on Explicit VLS Instruction at the Secondary Level

Hüseyin Yancı(Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı)0000-0003-2397-1443
Hayriye Avara(Amasya University)0000-0001-5575-3497
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Qualitative results revealed that although teachers stated they highly valued strategies, their students' classroom experiences did not align with this perception.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study employs both qualitative and quantitative methods to examine two questions: (a) how does explicit instruction in vocabulary learning strategies (VLS) affect vocabulary achievement and strategy usage amongst secondary school students, and (b) how do students' reported strategies for learning vocabulary converge or diverge from teacher-reported vocabulary teaching strategies?
📊
Key Findings & Data:The researchers collected quantitative information about the effectiveness of explicit Vocabulary Learning Strategy instruction on fifth-grade students through pre- and post-tests administered to 26 EFL students (ages 11 to 12) in two groups: an experimental group (n=13) that received nine weeks of explicit VLS instruction, and a control group (n=13) that participated in regular textbook-based instruction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Qualitative results revealed that although teachers stated they highly valued strategies, their students' classroom experiences did not align with this perception.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Vocabulary learning strategies · explicit strategy instruction · EFL vocabulary teaching

Abstract

This study employs both qualitative and quantitative methods to examine two questions: (a) how does explicit instruction in vocabulary learning strategies (VLS) affect vocabulary achievement and strategy usage amongst secondary school students, and (b) how do students' reported strategies for learning vocabulary converge or diverge from teacher-reported vocabulary teaching strategies? The researchers collected quantitative information about the effectiveness of explicit Vocabulary Learning Strategy instruction on fifth-grade students through pre- and post-tests administered to 26 EFL students (ages 11 to 12) in two groups: an experimental group (n=13) that received nine weeks of explicit VLS instruction, and a control group (n=13) that participated in regular textbook-based instruction. The quantitative data were collected using a vocabulary teaching strategy questionnaire completed by 119 EFL teachers. Also, a questionnaire on vocabulary instruction methods was administered to 119 secondary school EFL teachers in the same regional context, yielding an even broader dataset of teacher-reported methods for teaching EFL vocabulary. These teachers were not the teachers of record for the students involved in this research. Qualitative data were collected from students via semi-structured interviews following a nine-week intervention. The statistical analysis of the data demonstrated that students who received explicit VLS instruction performed significantly better than their counterparts who did not. Qualitative results revealed that although teachers stated they highly valued strategies, their students' classroom experiences did not align with this perception.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yancı, H., Avara, H. (2026). Vocabulary Teaching Beliefs and Student Strategy Use in EFL: A Mixed-Methods Study on Explicit VLS Instruction at the Secondary Level. The Literacy Trek, Volume: 12 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.47216/literacytrek.1921539

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (34)

  1. Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444803001903
  2. Boyas, E., Bryan, L. D., & Lee, T. (2012). Conditions affecting the usefulness of pre- and post-tests for assessment purposes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(4), 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.538665
  3. Catalán, R. M. J. (2003). Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00037
  4. Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190505000061
  5. Chiang, K. M., Chang, C.-H., & Lee, I. (2023). Vocabulary learning strategy instruction in the EFL secondary classroom: An exploratory study. Language Awareness, 32(1), 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1979566
  6. Chinpakdee, M., & Gu, P. Y. (2024). The impact of explicit strategy instruction on EFL secondary school learners’ reading. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 296-319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168821994157
  7. Cohen, A. D. (2014). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833200
  8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  9. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x
  10. Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
  11. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  12. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: individual differences in second language acquisition (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613349
  13. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
  14. Fan, M. Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: a study of hong kong learners. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 222–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00187
  15. Grenfell, M., & Harris, V. (2017).Language learner strategies: contexts, issues and applications in second language learning and teaching. Bloomsbury Academic.
  16. Griffiths, C. (2013). The strategy factor in successful language learning. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/GRIFFI9740
  17. Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: from theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
  18. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
  19. Kalaycı, Ş. (2008). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri (3rd ed.). Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  20. Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt040.0
  21. López‐Barrios, M., San Martín, M. G., & Villanueva de Debat, E. (2020). EFL vocabulary teaching beliefs and practices: The case of two teachers in Argentina. TESOL Journal, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.533
  22. MacIntyre, P. (2017). 2. An overview of language anxiety research and trends in its development. In C. Gkonou, M. Daubney & J. Dewaele (Ed.), New Insights into Language Anxiety: Theory, Research and Educational Implications (pp. 11-30). Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783097722-003
  23. Mirzaie, S., Hemmati, F., & Kiasi, M. A. (2018). Investigating iranian english language teachers’ practices and perceptions of vocabulary teaching. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0801.07
  24. Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
  25. O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
  26. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know. Newbury House.
  27. Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching & researching: language learning strategies (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838816
  28. Ölmez, F. (2014). A comparison of students’ and teachers’ perceptions on the use and instruction of vocabulary learning strategies (Master’s Thesis, Akdeniz University).
  29. Pavičić Takač, V. (2008). Vocabulary learning strategies and foreign language acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
  30. Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586011
  31. Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 199–227). Cambridge University Press.
  32. Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293977
  33. Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31(4), 304–319. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.31.4.304
  34. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. SAGE Publications.