Journals / The Journal of International Scientific Researches / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: Ek

University Branding and Measuring Brand Equity: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Studies

Pages
1–5
Publication Date
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings offer important insights that could have strategic implications for developing successful university branding strategies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In highly competitive marketplace, branding and brand management have become increasingly important as organizations seek competitive advantage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As colleges and universities have faced an increased competition, university administrators have realized that relying only on external marketing and branding efforts are not sufficient strategies for building strong university brands and brand equity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings offer important insights that could have strategic implications for developing successful university branding strategies.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:University branding · University brand equity · Brand ecosystem

Abstract

In highly competitive marketplace, branding and brand management have become increasingly important as organizations seek competitive advantage. As colleges and universities have faced an increased competition, university administrators have realized that relying only on external marketing and branding efforts are not sufficient strategies for building strong university brands and brand equity. Based on review of literature, this paper presents a summary of a brand ecosystem as conceptual and the results of empirical studies that utilize CBBE and brand ecosystem framework to understand university branding and measuring university brand equity. The results of the empirical studies indicate that universities are complex systems of various sub-brands that require brand management by considering all relevant dimensions in a holistic perspective in a brand ecosystem framework with their direct and indirect relationships in creating a strong university brand and brand equity. These findings offer important insights that could have strategic implications for developing successful university branding strategies.

🔖

Cite This Article

PINAR, M. (2020). University Branding and Measuring Brand Equity: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Studies. The Journal of International Scientific Researches, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: Ek, 1–5. https://ajindex.com/articles/806466

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aaker, D. (1991),
  2. Managing Brand Equity. Free-Press,
  3. New York, NY. Aaker, David (1996),
  4. Building Strong Brands. Free-Press,
  5. New York, NY Aggarwal-Sharma, A., Rao, V.R., and Popli, S. (2013), “Measuring consumer-based brand equity for Indian business schools”, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Vol. 23, No.2, pp. 175-203. Doi: 10.1080/08841241.2013.866609 Ambler, T., Bhattacharya, C. B., Edell, J., Keller, K. L., Lemon, K. N., and Mittal, V. (2002), “Relating brand and customer perspectives on marketing management,” Journal of Services Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 13–25.
  6. Belanger, C., Bali, S., and Longden, B. (2014), “How Canadian universities use social media to brand themselves”, Tertiary Education and Management, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 14–29.
  7. Cheng, Y. C., & Tam, W. M. (1997). Multi‐models of quality in education. Quality assurance in Education, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 22-31.
  8. Dollinger, M. Lode, J., and Coastes, H. (2018), “Co-creation in higher education: Towards a conceptual model”, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 210-231.
  9. Gibson, A. (2010), “Measuring business student satisfaction: a review and summary of the major predictors”, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 251-259.
  10. Girard, T. and Pinar, M. (2020a), "An empirical study of the dynamic relationships between the core and supporting brand equity dimensions in higher education", Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2020-0097
  11. Girard, T., Pinar, M. (2020b), Importance-Performance Gap Analysis of the University Brand Equity Dimensions, the Atlantic Marketing Association 2020 Virtual Conference (Competitive Track), October 2. Hemsley-Brown, J. and Goonawardana, S S. (2007), “Brand harmonization in the international higher education market”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 60, No. 9, pp. 942-948.
  12. Joyvice, C., Atemnkeng, J. T., Sama, M. C., Mbu, S. A., & Neba, N. B. (2019), “The effect of deceptive marketing communication on the brand equity of private higher education institutions (PHEI’s) in the Northwest and Southwest Regions of Cameroon”, International Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, Vol. 4, No.1, pp. 1-13.
  13. Keller, K. L. (1993), “Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 1-22.
  14. Keller, K. L. (2013), Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Eq