Journals / Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

IMPORTANT MENTOR BEHAVIORS FOR MEDICAL STUDENTS:ATTACHMENT THEORY AND MENTORING SYSTEMS

TIP ÖĞRENCİLERİ İÇİN ÖNEMLİ OLAN MENTÖR DAVRANIŞLARI:BAĞLANMA TEORİSİ VE MENTÖR SİSTEMLERİ

Pages
247–256
Publication Date
2019-08-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussion: Handling these variables above in the realm of mentoring relationship may provide opportunities to match mentor-mentee pairs more appropriately, to determine the program type, to detect differences in needs among preclinical years and orient the mentörs and mentees in the programs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Especially in health related sciences, education urges students have positive attitudes, personal integrity and self-reflection capacity Mentoring relationship is one of the areas where students learn, practice and emulate these abilities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material & Methods: Three-hundered-seventy-five students (mean age=20.5, Sd=1,3) from two different medical faculties filled the information form, relationships questionnaires and questions about the importance of mentor behaviours in one setting.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussion: Handling these variables above in the realm of mentoring relationship may provide opportunities to match mentor-mentee pairs more appropriately, to determine the program type, to detect differences in needs among preclinical years and orient the mentörs and mentees in the programs.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:: bağlanma tarzları · tıp eğitimi · mentörlük ilişkisi

Abstract

Introduction: Especially in health related sciences, education urges students have positive attitudes, personal integrity and self-reflection capacity Mentoring relationship is one of the areas where students learn, practice and emulate these abilities. Attachment theory may provide insight about the quality of and expectancies in these relationships. Material & Methods: Three-hundered-seventy-five students (mean age=20.5, Sd=1,3) from two different medical faculties filled the information form, relationships questionnaires and questions about the importance of mentor behaviours in one setting. Results: Students from formal mentoring program have higher rate of having a mentoring relationship. Women gave more importance to motivation function of the mentors. Secure attachment score had positive correlation with academic guidance and mutual respect functions of mentoring relationship. Dismissing attachment score was negatively correlated with all mentor functions. Discussion: Handling these variables above in the realm of mentoring relationship may provide opportunities to match mentor-mentee pairs more appropriately, to determine the program type, to detect differences in needs among preclinical years and orient the mentörs and mentees in the programs.

Özet

Giriş: Özellikle sağlık bilimleri alanında eğitim, öğrencileri olumlu tutum geliştirmeye, kişisel bütünlüğü sağlamaya ve refleksiyon yapabilme kapasitesi geliştirmeye zorlamaktadır. Mentörlük ilişkisi öğrencilerin bu becerileri öğrenip uygulayabileceği ve örnek alabilecekleri bir alandır. Bağlanma teorisi bu ilişkilerin kalitesi ve bu ilişkilerdeki beklentilerin anlaşılması konusunda içgörü sağlayabilir. Gereç ve Yöntem: İki ayrı tıp fakültesinden yaş ortalaması 20,5 (Ss=1,3) olan 375 öğrenci bilgi formu, ilişki ölçeği ve önemli bulunan mentör davranışlarına ilişkin soruları, tek oturumda cevapladılar. Sonuçlar: Formal sistemdeki öğrencilerin mentörünün olma oranı yüksekti. Kadınlar mentörün, motive etme işlevine daha fazla önem vermekteydi. Güvenli bağlanma puanı akademik rehberlik ve motivasyon sağlama işleviyle pozitif korelasyon gösterdi. Kayıtsız bağlanma tüm mentor işlevleriyle negatif korelasyon gösterdi. Tartışma: Mentörlük ilişkisinde, bahsi geçen değişkenleri ele almak mentör-danışan ikililerini daha iyi eşleştirme, program tipini belirleme, klinik öncesi öğrencileri arasındaki ihtiyaç farklılıklarını anlama, mentör ve danışanları daha iyi yönlendirme imkanı sunabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

İNANICI, S. Y., SARIKAYA, Ö., ŞAHİNER, M. (2019). IMPORTANT MENTOR BEHAVIORS FOR MEDICAL STUDENTS:ATTACHMENT THEORY AND MENTORING SYSTEMS. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 247–256. https://ajindex.com/articles/804471

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Garmel GM. Mentoring medical students in academic emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med 2004; 11: 1351-1357. Gormley B. An application of attachment theory: mentoring relationship Dynamics and ethical concerns. Mentoring & Tutoring Partnership in Learning 2008; 16: 45-62.
  2. Banerjee, R. Attachment theory shaping adult development: Impact on mentoring experiences. In: M. S. Plakhotnik & S. M. Nielsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Annual College of Education Research Conference: Urban and International Education Section Miami: Florida International University (pp. 1-6); 2006. Accessed December 2014, at http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1230&context=sferc Bowlby J. Bağlanma ( T. V. Soylu, Trans.). Istanbul: Pinhan Yay. (Original work published 1972); 2012. Banse R. Adult attachment and marital satisfaction: Evidence for dyadic configuration effects. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship 2004; 21: 273–282.
  3. Allen TD, Eby LT, Poteet ML, Lentz E, Lima L. Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 2004; 89: 127-136.
  4. Bozeman B, Feeney MK. Toward a useful theory of mentoring: A conceptual analysis and critique. Administration & Society 2007; 39: 719-739.
  5. Lewellen-Williams C, Johnson VA, Deloney LA, Thomas BR, Goyol A, Henry-Tillman R. The POD: A new model for mentoring underrepresented minority faculty. Academic Medicine 2006; 81: 275-279.
  6. Sambunjak D, Straus S, Marušić A. Mentoring in Academic Medicine A systematic review. The Journal of the American Medical Association 2006; 296: 1103-1115.
  7. Levy BD, Katz JT, Wolf MA, Sillman JS, Handin RI, Dzau VJ. An Initiative in Mentoring to Promote Residents’and Faculty Members’ Careers. Academic Medicine 2004; 79: 845– 850. Tourigny L, Pulich M. A critical examination of formal and informal mentoring. The Health Care Management 2005; 24: 68-76.
  8. Kandiko CB, Mawer M. Student Expectations and Perceptions of Higher Education: Project Report. 2013. Accessed December 2014, at https://www.kcl.ac.uk/study/learningteaching/kli/research/student-experience/QAASummary.pdf Rose GL. Group differences in graduate students' concepts of the ideal mentor. Research in High Education 2005; 46: 53-80.
  9. Wolfe A, Retallick MS, Martin R, Steiner C, Ashley J, Wolfe MS, Retallick RM. Mentoring functions practiced by undergraduate faculty in agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Education 2008; 49: 99-108. Middendorf Tom, “The impact of career, psychosocial, and spiri