It is found that practices of ECtHR are not directly a means of transitionaljustice, but they have effects on national authorities in the process of restitution.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper examines role of the European Court of Human Rights in dealing with human rightsabuses following armed conflicts, as one of the most notable fields in international relations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Inthis framework, it begins by reviewing the concepts of armed conflicts and transitional justice.To make it more concrete, cases of armed conflict across Europe are analyzed through the lens oftransitional justice.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is found that practices of ECtHR are not directly a means of transitionaljustice, but they have effects on national authorities in the process of restitution.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Silahlı Çatışmalar · Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi (AİHM) · Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi (AİHS)
Abstract
This paper examines role of the European Court of Human Rights in dealing with human rightsabuses following armed conflicts, as one of the most notable fields in international relations. Inthis framework, it begins by reviewing the concepts of armed conflicts and transitional justice.To make it more concrete, cases of armed conflict across Europe are analyzed through the lens oftransitional justice. It is found that practices of ECtHR are not directly a means of transitionaljustice, but they have effects on national authorities in the process of restitution.
Özet
Bu çalışmada uluslararası ilişkiler disiplinin temel inceleme alanlarından biri olan silahlı
GÜLENER, S. (2014). The Relationship between the European Court of Human Rights and Transitional Justice: A Review of Court Cases Related to Armed Conflicts. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 41, 3–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/80255