Journals / SDU International Journal of Educational Studies / 2015 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Sustaining small rural schools via e-learning

Pages
72–79
Publication Date
2015-10-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is also intended that the e-learning model which is being used in the province can provide a model to sustain small schools across the globe.Key words: Virtual schooling, Rural education, Small schools, Distance Education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Many small rural schools have been closed during the reform movement.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Many K-12 online programs across the world are providing educational opportunities to students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is also intended that the e-learning model which is being used in the province can provide a model to sustain small schools across the globe.Key words: Virtual schooling, Rural education, Small schools, Distance Education.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Virtual schooling · Rural education · Small schools

Abstract

Many small rural schools have been closed during the reform movement. A mountain of studies suggest that small school have various advantages. Despite these advantages, small schools are still in danger of closure and consolidation. However, the advent of internet is a ray of hope to sustain small schools in rural areas. Many K-12 online programs across the world are providing educational opportunities to students. Most of those virtual schools have focus on urban and suburban students. However, the Centre for Distance Learning and Innovation (CDLI) has been established to provide equitable access to educational opportunities to rural students. The author has outlined a short history of distance education in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador. Various issues of e-learning at the K-12 have been identified. It is also intended that the e-learning model which is being used in the province can provide a model to sustain small schools across the globe.Key words: Virtual schooling, Rural education, Small schools, Distance Education.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAQLAİN, N. (2015). Sustaining small rural schools via e-learning. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 72–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/799393

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Barbour, M. K. (2007). Portrait of rural virtual schooling. Canadian Journal of Educational administration and Policy, 59,1-21.
  2. Barbour, M. K., & Hill, J. (2011). What are they doing and how are they doing it? Rural student experiences in virtual schooling. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 25(1). Barbour, M. K., & Mulcahy, D. M. (2004). The role of mediating teachers in Newfoundland’s new model of distance education. The Morning Watch, 32(1). Barbour, M., & Mulcahy, D. M. (2006). An inquiry into retention and achievement differences in campus based and web based AP Courses. Rural Educator, 27, 8-12.
  3. Barbour, M. K.,& Mulcahy, D. M.(2009). Beyond volunteerism and good will: Examining the commitment of school-based teachers to distance education In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the annual conference of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (779-784).
  4. Norfolk, VA: AACE. Barbour, M. K., & Reeves, T. C. (2009). The reality of virtual schools: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 52(2), 402-416. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.009 Barker, B. (1985). Curricular offerings in small and large high schools: How broad is the disparity. Research in Rural Education, 3(1), 35-38.
  5. Berge, Z. L., & Mrozowski, S. (1999) Barriers to online teaching in elementary, secondary, and teacher education. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 27(2), 125-138.
  6. Berge, Z. L., & Clark, T. A. (2005). Virtual schools: Planning for success. New York: Teachers College Press.
  7. Cavanaugh, C. & Clark, T. (2007). The landscape of K-12 online learning. In Cavanaugh, C. & Blomeyer, B. (Eds.), What works in K-12 online learning. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education. Cavanaugh, C. S., Gillan, K. J., Kromrey, J., Hess, M., & Blomeyer, R. (2004). The effects of distance education on K–12 student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates. Choi, H. J., & Johnson, S. D. (2005). The effect of context-based video instruction on learning and motivation in online courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(4), 215-227.
  8. Compton, L. K. L., Davis, N., & Mackey, J. (2009). Field experience in virtual schools-to be there virtuality. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 459. Cosetti, A. (2002). Tutoring: A different background for the same role. In World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, 2002(1), p. 355-356.
  9. Davis, N., Roblyer, M.D., Charania, A., F