Journals / Sağlık Akademisyenleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Clinical quality measurement to improve quality of healthcare services

Sağlık hizmet kalitesinin iyileştirilmesi için klinik kalite ölçümü

Pages
181–185
Publication Date
2017-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical quality measurement or audit which one of the methods that can be used to support clinical quality improvement efforts done to improve patient care and outcomes in the Turkish health system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AbstractClinical quality is a measurable element of clinical performance that can be used to assess the quality and changes in the quality of services provided.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Two factors are needed to improve the quality of clinical care.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical quality measurement or audit which one of the methods that can be used to support clinical quality improvement efforts done to improve patient care and outcomes in the Turkish health system.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Klinik kalite · kalite iyileştirme · kalite ölçümü

Abstract

AbstractClinical quality is a measurable element of clinical performance that can be used to assess the quality and changes in the quality of services provided. Two factors are needed to improve the quality of clinical care. The first is to develop evidence-based medicine that identifies clinical practices to provide better care. The second is to know how to use evidence-based medicine into routine practice. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical quality measurement or audit which one of the methods that can be used to support clinical quality improvement efforts done to improve patient care and outcomes in the Turkish health system.

Özet

OzetKlinik kalite, sağlanan hizmetlerin kalitesini ve kalitesinde meydana gelen değişimleri değerlendirmek için kullanılabilecek ölçülebilir bir klinik performans unsurudur. Klinik bakımın kalitesini iyileştirmek için iki unsura ihtiyaç vardır. Bunlardan birincisi, daha iyi bir bakım vermek için klinik uygulamaları tanımlayan kanıta dayalı tıp uygulamalarını geliştirmek ve ikincisi ise rutin uygulamalarda kanıta dayalı tıptan nasıl faydalanılacağını bilmektir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türk Sağlık Sisteminde hasta bakımını ve sonuçlarını iyileştirmek için yapılan klinik kalite geliştirme çabalarını desteklemekte kullanılabilecek yöntemlerden biri olan klinik kalite ölçümü veya denetimini değerlendirmektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AVCI, K. (2017). Clinical quality measurement to improve quality of healthcare services. Sağlık Akademisyenleri Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 181–185. https://ajindex.com/articles/798476

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Ashmore, S., Ruthven, T. & Hazelwood, L. (2011b). Stage 3: Implementing change. In Burgess, R. (ed) NEW Principles of Best Practice in Clinical Audit. Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP). Abingdon, Radcliffe Medical Press,pp 81-92.
  2. Ashmore, S., Ruthven, T. &Hazelwood, L. (2011a). Stage 1: Preparation, planning and organisation of clinical audit. In Burgess, R. (ed) NEW Principles of Best Practice in Clinical Audit. Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP). Abingdon, Radcliffe Medical Press, pp 23-58.
  3. Choong, M. K., Tsafnat, G., Hibbert, P., Runciman, W. B. & Coiera, E. (2017). Linking clinical quality indicators to research evidence - a case study in asthma management for children. BMC Health Services Research,17:502. (Erişim Tarihi:16.09.2017), https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017- 2324-y Esposito P., Canton, A. D. (2014). Clinical audit, a valuable tool to improve quality of care: General methodology and applications in nephrology. World J Nephrol 3(4): 249–255.
  4. H a r r i n g t o n, L., P i g m a n, H. ( 2 0 1 0 ), “ Q u a l i t y Measurement”(Editor: Prathibha Varkey. In: Medical Quality Management Theory And Practice), Jones and Bartlett Publishers, London. pp.29-42. Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership, (2016), Best Practice in Clinical Audit, (Erişim Tarihi:16.09.2017),https:// www.rcr.ac.uk/sites/default/files/hqip_guide_for_best_ practice_in_clinical_audit.pdf Kelly, D. L. (2007), Applying Quality Management in HealthCare: A Systems Approach”, 2.ed, AUPHA HAP, Chicago, pp. 19-38. National Director of Quality and Patient Safety, (2017), A Practical Guide to Clinical Audit, (Erişim Tarihi:16.09.2017), http://www.hse.ie/eng/about/ W h o / Q I D / M e a s u r e m e n t Q u a l i t y / C l i n i c a l - A u d i t / practicalguideclaudit2013.pdf NHS Clinical Governance Support Team, (2005), A Practical Handbook for Clinical Audit, (Erişim Tarihi:16.09.2017),http:// webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20081112120728/ http://www.cgsupport.nhs.uk/Resources/Clinical_Audit/1@ Introduction_and_Contents.asp Nolan,.T, Berwick, D.M. (2006). All-or-none measurement raises the bar on performance. JAMA. 295(10):1168–1170.
  5. Potter, J., Fuller, C.& Ferris, M. (2010), Local clinical audit: handbook for physicians. Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership. (Erişim Tarihi:16.09.2017), https://www.bashh. org/documents/3186.pdf Report of the Commission on Patient Safety and Quality Assurance, (2008), Building a Culture of Patient Safety, (