With face-to-face interviews, instant-messaging (IM), and e-mail messages, I have collected data and the analyses revealed that language, family, religion (Islam), and agrarian values seem to be the major cultural factors shaping the educational conceptions of the participants.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this qualitative study, I have examined the Turkish people’s conceptions about education and the influence of culture on the acquisition of these conceptions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Twelve Turkish people participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With face-to-face interviews, instant-messaging (IM), and e-mail messages, I have collected data and the analyses revealed that language, family, religion (Islam), and agrarian values seem to be the major cultural factors shaping the educational conceptions of the participants.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Culture · agrarian values · language socialization
Abstract
In this qualitative study, I have examined the Turkish people’s conceptions about education and the influence of culture on the acquisition of these conceptions. Twelve Turkish people participated in the study. With face-to-face interviews, instant-messaging (IM), and e-mail messages, I have collected data and the analyses revealed that language, family, religion (Islam), and agrarian values seem to be the major cultural factors shaping the educational conceptions of the participants.
AVCI, Ö. (2015). The Influence of Culture on the Acquisition of Turkish People’s Conceptions about Education: A Qualitative Study. PESA Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 98–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/796818
Hallowell, A. I. (1955). The self in its behavioral environment. In Culture and Experience (pp.75-110). New York: Schocken Books. Hareven, T. K. (1989). Historical changes in children's networks in the family and community. In D., Belle (Ed.), Children's social networks and social support (pp. 15-36), New York: Wiley. Houston, C. (2006). The never ending dance: kemalism and the power of self-institution in Tturkey. The Autralian Journal of Antropology. 17/2, 161-178.
Kadioglu, A. (1996). The paradox of Turkish nationalism and the construction of official identity. Middle Eastern Studies, 32/2, 177-193.
Lewis, B. (2002). The emergence of modern Turkey. New York: Oxford University Press.
LeVine, R. A. (1973). Basic questions for culture and personality research. In Culture, behavior and personality: An introduction to the comparative study of psychosocial adaptation (pp. 3-14). Chicago: Aldine. LeVine, R. A. (1973). Theoretical conceptonis of culture-personality relations. In Culture, behavior and personality: An introduction to the comparative study of psychosocial adaptation. Chicago: Aldine. 43-59.
LeVine, R.A. & White, M. I. (1986). Human Conditions: the cultural basis of educational developments (pp. 24-72). New York: Routledge. Mango, A. (1968). Turkey. Great Britain: Thames and Hudson. Mango, A. (1994). Turkey: the new challenge of a new role. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Mango, A. (2004). The Turks today. New York: The Overlook Press.
Mardin, S. (1990). European culture and the development of modern Turkey. In A. Evin and G. Denton (Eds.) Turkey and the European Community, Opladen, Germany: Leske and Budrich. Ochs, E. (1986). Introduction. In B. Schieffelin & E. Ochs (Eds.). Language socialization across cultures (pp. 1-13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ö.S.Y.M. Retrieved from http://osym.gov.tr/belge/1-4843/ossye-iliskin-sayisal-bilgiler.html