Journals / NATURENGS / 2020 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Correlations between SPT, PMT and MASW on Quaternary Alluvial – Fluvial Sediments In Battalgazi, Malatya, Turkey

Journal
NATURENGS
Pages
39–53
Publication Date
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The low R2 values were attributed to the exceedingly heterogenous structure of the soil and locally changing gravel amounts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The field tests such as the standard penetration test (SPT), pressuremeter test (PMT), and Multi-Channel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) give information about the stratigraphic properties, structure, underground water level, bearing capacity, and liquefaction of soil.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study area, the gravel content ranged from 0% to 47% depending on local differences.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The low R2 values were attributed to the exceedingly heterogenous structure of the soil and locally changing gravel amounts.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Correlation · Soil tests · Alluvial-fluvial sediments

Abstract

The field tests such as the standard penetration test (SPT), pressuremeter test (PMT), and Multi-Channel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) give information about the stratigraphic properties, structure, underground water level, bearing capacity, and liquefaction of soil. The studies investigating the correlations between these tests are quite common. Most of the studies found in the literature have focused on sand, silty, and clay soils, while the number of the studies about gravelly soils is limited. In the study area, the gravel content ranged from 0% to 47% depending on local differences. Gravel sizes reached 80 mm at certain locations but remained below it in most locations. In this study, it has been discussed that how correlation studies will change in heterogeneous soils. Among the correlations between the field test results, with the highest R2 value of 0.6847, the strongest correlation was obtained between the PMT-PL value and SPT-N60 value, while, with a R2 value of 0.3906, the weakest correlation was between the PMT-Em value and MASW- Vs value. The low R2 values were attributed to the exceedingly heterogenous structure of the soil and locally changing gravel amounts.

🔖

Cite This Article

CEYLAN, Ç., ÖNAL, P. D. M. (2020). Correlations between SPT, PMT and MASW on Quaternary Alluvial – Fluvial Sediments In Battalgazi, Malatya, Turkey. NATURENGS, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 39–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/793323

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Anbazhagan, P., Kumar, A. and Sitharam, T.G. (2013). Seismic site classification and correlation between standard penetration test N value and shear wave velocity for Lucknow City in Indo-Gangetic Basin. Pure and Applied Geophysics 170: 299-318
  2. Samui, P. and Sitharam, T. (2010). Correlation between SPT, CPT and MASW. Int J Geotechnical Eng 4(2):279-288
  3. Kirar, B, Maheshwari, B.K. and Muley, P. (2016). Correlation between shear wave velocity (Vs) and SPT resistance (N) for Roorkee Region. Int J Geosynthetics and Ground Eng 2( 9):1-11
  4. Onal, M. (1995). Miocene stratigraphy and lignite potantial of the northern part of the Malatya graben basin Eastern Anatolia- Turkey. International Earth Science Colloguium on the Aegean Region Proceedings, İzmir 11:607-621. [5]
  5. ASTM D1586 / D1586M-18, Standard Test Method for Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018, www.astm.org [7] ASTM D 422-63, 2003. Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils, In:Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 04.08, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 93-99
  6. ASTM D4318-17e1. Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017
  7. ASTM D2487-17e1. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System); ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017
  8. Cheshomi, A. and Ghodrati, M. (2014). Estimating Mernard pressuremeter modules and limit pressure from SPT in silty sand and silty clay soils. A case study in Mashhad, Iran. Geomechanics and Geoengineering 10(3):194-202
  9. Naseem, A. and Jamil, S.M. (2016). Development of correlation between standard penetration test and pressuremeter test for clayey sand and sandy soil. Soil and Foundation Eng 53(2): 98-102
  10. Anwar, M.B. (2016). Correlation between PMT and SPT results for calcereous soil. Housing and Building National Research Center 14(1): 50-55
  11. Kulhawy, F.H. and Mayne, P.W. (1990). Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design. Electric Power Research Institution Rep-EL-6800 Final report, August, Project 1493-6
  12. Bozbey, I. and Togrol, E. (2010). Correlation of standard penetration test and pressuremeter data a case study from Estunbol, Turkey. Bulletin of Eng Geology an