Journals / Middle Black Sea Journal of Health Science / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Assessment of Dentists’ Referral Patterns to Endodontist in Turkey

Pages
220–226
Publication Date
2020-08-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: We concluded that many patient- and tooth-related factors influence the endodontic referral of patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To determine the factors of endodontic referral from general dental practitioners in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A questionnaire containing 39 questions was designed to determine the need for referral to endodontists and the factors that influenced the decision to refer a patient to the endodontist.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: We concluded that many patient- and tooth-related factors influence the endodontic referral of patients.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Case management · Endodontics · Referral

Abstract

Objective: To determine the factors of endodontic referral from general dental practitioners in Turkey. Methods: A questionnaire containing 39 questions was designed to determine the need for referral to endodontists and the factors that influenced the decision to refer a patient to the endodontist. The survey was sent by e-mail to be registered dentists in a database of the Turkish Dental Association, and only unequivocal responses were included in calculating the percentage data. The categorical data were analyzed with a chi-square test, and the results were presented as frequency and percentage. The significance threshold for all tests was set at p<0.05. Results: The response rate was 5.5% (655). The majority (96.8%) of the respondents performed root canal treatment by themselves, and they refer the patient to an endodontist (92.3%) when they encounter a challenging case. Statistical analyses revealed that female general dentists referred more patients to endodontists than males (p<0.05). “Limitations in mouth opening” was the most common referral reason in the patient related factors. “Difficult diagnosis” was the most common referral reason in the teeth and diagnosis-related factors. A statistically negative correlation was found between the professional experience and patient referral (p<0.05). Conclusion: We concluded that many patient- and tooth-related factors influence the endodontic referral of patients. For a successful treatment, a general dentist should make a proper diagnosis and refer to a specialist if necessary.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARIYILMAZ, Ö., KALYONCUOĞLU, E. (2020). Assessment of Dentists’ Referral Patterns to Endodontist in Turkey. Middle Black Sea Journal of Health Science, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 220–226. https://ajindex.com/articles/791125

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abbott JA, Wolcott JF, Gordon G, Terlap HT. Survey of general dentists to identify characteristics associated with increased referrals to endodontists. J Endod. 2011;37(9):1191-6. Abbott PV. Analysis of a referral-based endodontic practice: Part 1. Demographic data and reasons for referral. J Endod. 1994;20(2):93-6.
  2. Alley BS, Kitchens G, Alley L, Eleazer P. A comparison of survival of teeth following endodontic treatment performed by general dentists or by specialists. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;98(1):115-8. Avcıoglu GŞ. Internet survey applications in social sciences: response rate, data quality, sample problems and solutions. International Journal of Human Sciences 2014;11:89-113.
  3. Bader JD, Shugars DA. Agreement among dentists’ decisions for restorative treatment. J Dent Res. 1993;72(5):891-6.
  4. Barnes, S. Patel & F. Mannocci. Why do general dental practitioners refer to a specific specialist endodontist in practice? Int Endod J. 2011;44(1):21-32.
  5. Caplan DJ, Reams G, Weintraub JA (1999). Recommendations for Endodontic Referral among Practitioners in a Dental HMO. J Endod. 1999;25(5):369-75.
  6. Cottrell DA, Reebye UN, Blyer SM. Referral patterns of general dental practitioners for oral surgical procedures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(4):686-90. de Cleen MJH, Schuurs AHB, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. Periapical status and prevalence of endodontic treatment in an adult Dutch population. Int Endod J. 1993;26(2):112-9. deMoor RJG, Hommez GMG, De Boever JG, Delme KIM, Martens GEI. Periapical health related to the quality of root canal treatment in a Belgian population. Int Endod J. 2000;33(2):113-20.
  7. Elderton RJ, Nuttal NM. Variation among dentists in planning treatment. Br Dent J. 1983;154(7):201-6.
  8. Falcon HC, Richardson P, Shaw MJ, Bulman JS, Smith BGN. Developing an index of restorative treatment need. Br Dent J. 2001;190(9):479-86.
  9. Friedman S, Abitbol S, Lawrence HP. Treatment outcomes in endodontics: The Toronto Study. Phase 1: Initial Treatment. J Endod. 2003;29(12):787-93.
  10. Gencoğlu N, Pekiner FN, Gumru B, Helvacıoğlu D. Periapical status and quality of root fillings and coronal restorations in an adult Turkish subpopulation. Eur J Dent. 2010;4(1):17-22. Harty FJ. A survey of endodontic procedures performed by practitioners in limited practice. Int Endod J. 1992 Jan;25(1):25-8.
  11. Hommez GM, De Moor RJ, Braem M. Endodontic treatment performed by Flemish dentists. Part 2. Canal filling and decision making for referrals and treatment of api