Journals / Maliye Dergisi / 2010 / Sayı: 158

The Relationship Between Social Expenditures and Economic Growth: A Dynamic Analysis Intended for 1960- 2005 Period of the Turkish Economy

Sosyal Harcamalar ve İktisadi Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye Ekonomisinde 1960 – 2005 Dönemine Yönelik Bir Dinamik Analiz

Pages
398–421
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the analysis accentuate the positive effect of social expenditures as well as the components of social expenditures e.g., education, health and social protection expenditures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In endogenous growth models different empirical studies which analyze the relationship between social expenditures and economic growth indicate different results.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Nevertheless, the results of studies analyze the relationship between social protection expenditures and economic growth yield mixed results.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the analysis accentuate the positive effect of social expenditures as well as the components of social expenditures e.g., education, health and social protection expenditures.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In endogenous growth models different empirical studies which analyze the relationship between social expenditures and economic growth indicate different results. The widely accepted view is the positive effect of health and education expenditures, as the components of social expenditures, on the economic growth. Nevertheless, the results of studies analyze the relationship between social protection expenditures and economic growth yield mixed results. The object of this study is to test the dynamic interactions among social expenditures as well as the components of these expenditures and economic growth in Turkish economy for 1960 – 2005 period. The results of the analysis accentuate the positive effect of social expenditures as well as the components of social expenditures e.g., education, health and social protection expenditures.

Özet

İçsel büyüme literatüründe sosyal harcamaların düzeyi ile iktisadi büyüme arasındaki ilişkiyi inceleyen uygulamalı çalışmalar farklı sonuçlara işaret etmektedir. Sosyal harcamaların bileşenlerinden olan eğitim ve sağlık harcamalarının iktisadi büyümeye olan olumlu katkıları genel kabul gören görüştür. Ancak sosyal koruma harcamalarının iktisadi büyümeye yönelik etkisini araştıran çalışmalar farklı sonuçlar vermiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye ekonomisinde 1960–2005 dönemi için sosyal harcama düzeyinin ve bu harcamaların bileşenlerinin iktisadi büyüme ile olan dinamik etkileşimlerini test etmektir. Analiz sonuçları gerek sosyal harcamaların gerekse de bu harcamaların alt bileşenleri olan eğitim, sağlık ve sosyal koruma harcamalarının iktisadi büyüme üzerindeki olumlu etkisini vurgulamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARISOY, İ., ÜNLÜKAPLAN, İ., ERGEN, Z. (2010). The Relationship Between Social Expenditures and Economic Growth: A Dynamic Analysis Intended for 1960- 2005 Period of the Turkish Economy. Maliye Dergisi, Sayı: 158, 398–421. https://ajindex.com/articles/79108

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ahmad, E., Dreze, J. H. ve Sen, A. K. (der.) (1991), Social Security in Developing Countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Arjona, R., Ladaique, M. ve Pearson, M. (2002), “Social Protection and Growth”, OECD Economic Studies, 35, 7- 45. Arısoy, İ. (2005), “Wagner ve Keynes Hipotezleri Çerçevesinde Türkiye’de Kamu Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi”, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(2), 63-80.
  3. Atkinson, A. B. (1995), “The Welfare State and Economic Performance”, National Tax Journal, 48, 171-198.
  4. Atkinson, A. B. (1996), “Growth and the Welfare State: Is the Welfare State Necessarily Bad for Economic Growth”, New Economy, 3, 182-186.
  5. Bakış, O., Jobert, T. ve Tuncer, R. (2008), “Kamu Harcamaları ve Büyüme: Zaman Serileri Analizi”, Kamu Harcamalarının Bileşiminin Büyüme ve Refah Etkileri içinde Betam, 81-101.
  6. Baldacci, E., Clements, B., Gupta, S. ve Cui, Q. (2004), “Social Spending, Human Capital and Growth in Developing Countries: Implications for Achieving the MDGs”, IMF Working Paper, WP/04/217. Barro, R. J. (1990), “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 98, S103-125. Betam (2008), Kamu Harcamalarının Bileşiminin Büyüme ve Refah Etkileri, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Araştırmalar Merkezi. Cashin, P. (1994), “Government Spending, Taxes and Economic Growth”, IMF Working Paper, WP/94/92. Dayangaç, R., Gürsel, S. ve Öztürk, B. (2008), “Kamu Harcamalarının Bileşiminin Büyüme ve Refah Etkisi” Kamu Harcamalarının Bileşiminin Büyüme ve Refah Etkileri içinde Betam, 105-136.
  7. Devarajan, S., Swaroop, V. ve Zou, H. Z. (1996), “The Composition of Public Expenditure and Economic Growth”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 37, 313- 414. Enders, W. (2004), Applied Econometric Time Series, 2nd Edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons. Fic, T. ve Ghate, C. (2005), “The Welfare State, Thresholds and Economic Growth”, Economic Modelling, 22, 571 - 598. Granger, C. W. J. (1988), “Some Recent Developments in a Concept of Causality”, Journal of Econometrics, 39, 199-211.
  8. Gwartney, J., Lawson, R.ve Holcombe, R.G. (1998), “The Size and Functions of Government and Economic Growth”, Joint Economic Committee Paper, Washington DC. Greiner, A., Semmler, W. ve Gong, G. (2005), The Forces of Economic Growth: A Time Series Perspective, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  9. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R., Ronald, L. T. ve Black, W. C. (1998),
  10. Multivariate Data Analysis, New Jersey: Prentice Hall In