Journals / Journal of Eta Maritime Science / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Indoor Positioning Technology Selection Using a Combined AHP and PROMETHEE Method at SEDEF Shipyard

Pages
108–123
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Keywords: Shipyard, Indoor positioning systems, MCDM, AHP, PROMETHEE

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Shipyard 4.0 refers to the application of Industry 4.0 principles to shipyards.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To keep up with the challenges, the shipyard industry, like other industries, strives to realize Shipyard 4.0 in its industry.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: Shipyard, Indoor positioning systems, MCDM, AHP, PROMETHEE
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Shipyard 4.0 refers to the application of Industry 4.0 principles to shipyards. To keep up with the challenges, the shipyard industry, like other industries, strives to realize Shipyard 4.0 in its industry. The goal of this study is the creation of an indoor positioning system (IPS) to determine the positions of all assets in the shipyards, such as employees, welding machines, cranes, and carriers, and track their movements using an IPS. Users can use positioning systems to find and track the location of a particular object. The most well-known position tracking system is the Global Positioning System, which is widely used in determining the location and position of objects in the external environment. The GPS for locating and tracking an object indoors is not recommended for indoor use, as indoor signals transmitted from a satellite to a device are weakened by indoor obstructions. Many different IPSs are in development that track and position objects indoors. Choosing the most suitable IPS for a shipyard is a multicriteria decision problem. A combined AHP and PROMETHEE method is proposed in this study to determine which IPS technologies would be most suitable in shipyards. In the literature review, it is shown that the AHP and PROMETHEE methods are used separately or together in solving problems in many areas. However, no study has been conducted in which the AHP and PROMETHEE methods are used together for the IPS selection problem. For this purpose, an application of the proposed method in IPS selection and evaluation was carried out at the SEDEF shipyard, and the most suitable technology was determined by evaluating different IPS technology options. Keywords: Shipyard, Indoor positioning systems, MCDM, AHP, PROMETHEE

🔖

Cite This Article

ARISOY, F., ÖZGÜRBÜZ, E., ÇİL, A. Y., KILINÇ, H., ÇİL, İ. (2022). Indoor Positioning Technology Selection Using a Combined AHP and PROMETHEE Method at SEDEF Shipyard. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 108–123. https://ajindex.com/articles/562823

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. W. C. Simões, G. S. Machado, A. Sales, M. M. de Lucena, N. Jazdi, and V. F. de Lucena, “A review of technologies and techniques for indoor navigation systems for the visually impaired,” Sensors, vol. 20, 3935. 2020
  2. I, Cil. F. Arisoy, H. Kilinc, and A. Y. Cil, “A Comparative Analysis of Indoor Positioning Technologies in Shipyard Digitalization Context,” Journal of Marine Technology and Environment, vol. 1, pp. 15-25, 2022
  3. L. Dorji and T. Horanont, “Comparative Assessment of Indoor Positioning Technologies, Techniques, and Algorithms,” in 2018 International Joint Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing (iSAI-NLP), pp. 1-6, 2018. doi: 10.1109/iSAI-NLP.2018.8692924
  4. C. Liu, H. Wang, M. Liu and P. Li, “Research and Analysis of Indoor Positioning Technology,” in 4th International Conference on Advanced Electronic Materials, Computers and Software Engineering (AEMCSE), 2021, pp. 1212-17, 2021. doi: 10.1109/ AEMCSE51986.2021.00248 [5] A. Giretti, A. Carbonari and M. Vaccarini, “Ultra wide band positioning systems for advanced construction site management,” New Approach of Indoor and Outdoor Localization Systems, InTech Open Access Publisher, pp. 89-112, 2012
  5. T. Li, Gallagher, A.G. Dempster and C. Rizos, “How feasible is the use of magnetic field alone for indoor positioning?” in 2012 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), pp. 1-9, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/ IPIN.2012.6418880 [7] I. Cil, F. Arisoy, and H. Kilinc, “An analysis on industrial internet of things in digital transformation of shipyard industry in Turkey,” Global Journal of Computer Sciences: Theory and Research, vol. 11, pp. 67-87, Oct 2021
  6. K. Kabassi, S. Mpalomenou, and A. Martinis, “AHP and PROMETHEE II for the evaluation of websites of mediterranean protected areas??? managing boards”. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, vol. 24, pp. 1-17, 2021
  7. B. Vahid, B. Zahraie, and A. Roozbahani, “Comparison of AHP and PROMETHEE family decision making methods for selection of building structural system,” American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 2, pp. 149-159, Sep 2014
  8. S. S. Goswami, “Outranking Methods: Promethee I and Promethee II,” Foundations of Management, vol. 12, pp. 93-110, Jul 2020
  9. A. Singh, A. Gupta, and A. Mehra, “Best criteria selection based PROMETHEE II method,” OPSEARCH, vol. 58, 160-180, March 2020
  10. I. Cil, F. Arisoy, H. Kilinc, E. Özgür