Journals / Middle Black Sea Journal of Health Science / 2022 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Gross Alpha and Beta Radioactivity Concentrations in Tooth Samples

Pages
1–8
Publication Date
2022-02-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no statistically significant difference between the genders in both GA and GB radioactivity concentrations for all groups (p>0.05).Conclusion: While the GA radioactivity concentration was affected by the age factor, it was not affected by the gender factor.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Teeth are used as an important data source to estimate radioactivity accumulation in individuals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The teeth samples were divided into 4 groups according to the age factor (Group 1: 6-15 years, Group 2: 16-30 years, Group 3: 31-45 years, and Group 4: 46-65 years).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no statistically significant difference between the genders in both GA and GB radioactivity concentrations for all groups (p>0.05).Conclusion: While the GA radioactivity concentration was affected by the age factor, it was not affected by the gender factor.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Teeth · gross alpha · gross beta

Abstract

Objective: Teeth are used as an important data source to estimate radioactivity accumulation in individuals. This study aimed to evaluation the gross alpha (GA) and gross beta (GB) radioactivity concentrations in tooth samples.Methods: Mandibular permanent first molar teeth of individuals living in the Middle Black Sea region were used for the study to ensure standardization. The teeth samples were divided into 4 groups according to the age factor (Group 1: 6-15 years, Group 2: 16-30 years, Group 3: 31-45 years, and Group 4: 46-65 years). Each group was divided into two subgroups according to gender factor. Measurements were completed with a nuclear spectroscopic system containing a gas-flow proportional counter. Data were analyzed statistically.Results: While a statistically significant difference was detected among groups for GA radioactivity concentration (p<0.05), no significant difference was detected among groups for GB (p>0.05). Mean GA value was higher in Group 1 (6-15 years) compared to the other groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the genders in both GA and GB radioactivity concentrations for all groups (p>0.05).Conclusion: While the GA radioactivity concentration was affected by the age factor, it was not affected by the gender factor.

Özet

Objective: Teeth are used as an important data source to estimate radioactivity accumulation in individuals. This study aimed to evaluation the gross alpha (GA) and gross beta (GB) radioactivity concentrations in tooth samples.Methods: Mandibular permanent first molar teeth of individuals living in the Middle Black Sea region were used for the study to ensure standardization. The teeth samples were divided into 4 groups according to the age factor (Group 1: 6-15 years, Group 2: 16-30 years, Group 3: 31-45 years, and Group 4: 46-65 years). Each group was divided into two subgroups according to gender factor. Measurements were completed with a nuclear spectroscopic system containing a gas-flow proportional counter. Data were analyzed statistically.Results: While a statistically significant difference was detected among groups for GA radioactivity concentration (p<0.05), no significant difference was detected among groups for GB (p>0.05). Mean GA value was higher in Group 1 (6-15 years) compared to the other groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the genders in both GA and GB radioactivity concentrations for all groups (p>0.05).Conclusion: While the GA radioactivity concentration was affected by the age factor, it was not affected by the gender factor.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERZURUMLU, Z. Ü., ŞAHİN, A., GÜLER, Ç., ÖMEZLİ, M. M., KORKMAZ, M. E., AĞAR, O., ÇANKAYA, S. (2022). Evaluation of Gross Alpha and Beta Radioactivity Concentrations in Tooth Samples. Middle Black Sea Journal of Health Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/791003

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aghamiri SMR, Ghorbani Z, Darafsheh A, Torabzadeh H, Fathivand AA, Minuchehr A, et al. 226Ra concentration in the teeth of habitants of areas with high level of natural radioactivity in Ramsar. J Environ Radioact. 2006;89(3):212-218
  2. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology principals and ınterpretation. 7 th ed. Mosby, Canada, 2014. p. 1-28
  3. Cinelli G, Tollefsen T, Bossew P, Gruber V, Bogucarskis K, De Felice L, et al. Digital version of the European Atlas of natural radiation. J Environ Radioact. 2019;196:240-252
  4. Sogut O, Aydin MF, Kucukonder E, Zorer OS, Dogru M. Measurement of gross alpha and gross beta activity concentrations in human tooth. J Environ Radioact. 2010;101(3):226-229
  5. Taskin H, Kobya Y, Tokgoz M, Bassari A, Yesilkanat CM. Biomonitoring of trace elements and gross alpha/ beta radioactivity levels in human teeth: A case study from Istanbul, Turkey. Microchemical Journal. 2018;141:458-465
  6. Clemente GF, Renzetti A, Santori G, Steinhäusler F, Pohl-Ruling J. Relationship between the 210Pb content of teeth and exposure to Rn and Rn daughters. Health Phys. 1984;47(2):253-262
  7. Delibacak S, Ongun AR. Influence of treated sewage sludge applications on corn and second crop wheat yield and some soil properties of sandy loam soil. Fresen Environ Bull. 2016;25(1):43-54
  8. Kir I, Erdogan M, Engin MS, Cay S. Trace metals in sediment, water and their bioaccumalation in Carp (Cyprinus Carpio L., 1758) samples, captured from the Karacaoren (I) Dam Lake, Turkey. Fresen Environ Bull. 2016;25(9):3557-3562
  9. Beir VI. Report of the Committee on the Biological effects of Ionizing Radiation, National. Research, Council. 1999
  10. Brown CJ, Chenery SR, Smith B, Mason C, Tomkins A, Roberts GJ, et al. Environmental influences on the trace element content of teeth—implications for disease and nutritional status. Arch Oral Biol. 2004;49(9):705-717
  11. Corbacho JA, Zapata-García D, Montaña M, Fons J, Camacho A, Guillén J, et al. Selection of the appropriate radionuclide source for the efficiency calibration in methods of determining gross alpha activity in water. J Environ Radioact 2016;151:22-7
  12. Butler FE. Strontium-90 in human teeth. Natur. 1961;11(189):848-849
  13. Yamamoto M, Hinoide M, Ohkubo Y, Ueno K. Concentration of 226Ra in human teeth. Health Phys. 1994;67(5):535-540
  14. Kulev YD, Polikarpov GG, Prigodey EV, Assimakopoulos PA. Strontium-90 concentrations in human teeth in South Ukraine, 5 years after the Chernobyl accident. Sci Tota