Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: Ek (Suppl.) 1

Perovskite Solar Cells and Instability Problems

Perovskit Güneş Hücreleri ve Kararsızlık Problemleri

Pages
297–304
Publication Date
2018-12-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study consists of a compilation of the studies published in the literature on the problems of instability especially during the period from the first production of Perovskite solar cells to the present day.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is a necessity for our generations to produce electricity in a sustainable form that does not damage nature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Perovskite solar cells have become comparable to silicon-based cells by passing ~ 20% of the PCE value in a very short time (~ 2015) from their initial production (~ 2009).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study consists of a compilation of the studies published in the literature on the problems of instability especially during the period from the first production of Perovskite solar cells to the present day.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Perovskit güneş hücreleri · Kararsızlık problemi · Spin kaplama tekniği

Abstract

It is a necessity for our generations to produce electricity in a sustainable form that does not damage nature. In this context, renewable energy sources are a sustainable resource. The most potentially high source of renewable energy sources is the sun. The most commonly studied solar cells in the literature are silicon-based solar cells. However, the production of silicon-based solar cells is difficult and costly. To overcome these obstacles, it is seen that studies have been made on organic solar cells in the literature. However, the Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE) values are very low compared to the silicon-based solar cells in the organic solar cells market. At the same time, organic-based solar cells are more unstable compared to silicon-based solar cells. One of the important issues that continue to be studied in the organic solar cell family literature is Perovskite solar cells. Perovskite solar cells have become comparable to silicon-based cells by passing ~ 20% of the PCE value in a very short time (~ 2015) from their initial production (~ 2009). However, Perovskite encounters a problem of instability after solar cell production. Perovskite, an easy-to-produce, cost-effective and environmentally friendly product, is a potentially high-value material to become a commercial solar cell in the future after the problems of instability in solar cells have been overcome. This study consists of a compilation of the studies published in the literature on the problems of instability especially during the period from the first production of Perovskite solar cells to the present day.

Özet

Elektrik enerjisinin doğaya zarar vermeden ve sürdürülebilir bir formda üretimini sağlamak gelecek nesillerimiz için bir zorunluluktur. Bu bağlamda yenilenebilir enerji kaynakları sürdürülebilir bir kaynaktır. Yenilenebilir enerji kaynakları arasında en potansiyeli yüksek kaynak ise güneştir. Literatürde en yaygın olarak çalışılan güneş hücreleri ise Silisyum tabanlı güneş hücreleridir. Ancak Silisyum tabanlı güneş hücrelerinin üretimi zor ve maliyetlidir. Bu olumsuzlukları ortadan kaldırmak için literatürde organik güneş hücreleri üzerine çalışmalar yapıldığı görülmektedir. Ancak organik güneş hücrelerinin piyasada bulunan Silisyum tabanlı güneş hücrelerine göre Güç Enerji Dönüşümü (PCE) değerleri çok düşüktür. Aynı zamanda organik tabanlı güneş hücreleri silisyum tabanlı güneş hücreleri ile karşılaştırıldığında daha kararsız olduğu gözlenmektedir. Organik güneş hücresi ailesi literatüründe üzerine çalışmalar yapılmaya devam edilmekte olan önemli konulardan birisi de Perovskit güneş hücreleridir. Perovskit güneş hücreleri ilk üretimlerinden (~2009) çok kısa bir zaman sonrasında (~2015) PCE değeri ~%20’leri geçerek silisyum tabanlı hücreler ile karşılaştırılabilir duruma gelmiştir. Ancak Perovskit güneş hücresi üretimden sonra kararsızlık problemi yaşamaktadır. Üretimi kolay, maliyeti düşük ve doğa dostu bir ürün olan Perovskit güneş hücreleri kararsızlık problemlerinin aşılmasından sonra gelecekte ticari güneş hücresi olma potansiyeli yüksek bir malzemedir. Bu çalışmada Perovskit güneş hücrelerinin ilk üretiminden günümüze kadar geçen sürede özellikle kararsızlık problemleri üzerine literatürde yayınlanan çalışmaların bir derlemesi hazırlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, G., ÖZKÖK, Ç. (2018). Perovskite Solar Cells and Instability Problems. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: Ek (Suppl.) 1, 297–304. https://ajindex.com/articles/790210

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Bednorz, J. G. and K. A. Müller. 1986. “Possible High T c Superconductivity in the Ba — La — Cu — O System.” 193:267–71. Retrieved (http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-011-1622-0_32).Bella,
  2. Federico, Claudio Gerbaldi, Claudia Barolo, and Michael Grätzel. 2015. “Aqueous Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells.” Chem. Soc. Rev. 44(11):3431–73. Retrieved (http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C4CS00456F).
  3. Bi, Cheng et al. 2014. “Understanding the Formation and Evolution of Interdiffusion Grown Organolead Halide Perovskite Thin Films by Thermal Annealing.” J. Mater. Chem. A 2(43):18508–14. Retrieved (http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C4TA04007D).
  4. Bisquert, Juan et al. 2008. “A Review of Recent Results on Electrochemical Determination of the Density of Electronic States of Nanostructured Metal-Oxide Semiconductors and Organic Hole Conductors.” Inorganica Chimica Acta 361(3):684–98.
  5. Christians, Jeffrey A., Pierre A. Miranda Herrera, and Prashant V. Kamat. 2015. “Transformation of the Excited State and Photovoltaic Efficiency of CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite upon Controlled Exposure to Humidified Air.” Journal of the American Chemical Society 137(4):1530–38.
  6. Etgar, Lioz et al. 2012. “Mesoscopic CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 /TiO 2 Heterojunction Solar Cells.” Journal of the American Chemical Society 134(42):17396–99. Retrieved (http://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja307789s).
  7. Frost, Jarvist M. et al. 2014. “Atomistic Origins of High-Performance in Hybrid Halide Perovskite Solar Cells.” Nano Letters 14(5):2584–90. Retrieved (http://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/nl500390f).
  8. Green, Martin A. et al. 2018. “Solar Cell Efficiency Tables (Version 51).” Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 26(1):3–12.
  9. Green, Martin A., Keith Emery, Yoshihiro Hishikawa, Wilhelm Warta, and Ewan D. Dunlop. 2015. “Solar Cell Efficiency Tables (Version 45).” Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 23(1):1–9. Retrieved (http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/pip.2573).
  10. Green, Martin A., Anita Ho-Baillie, and Henry J. Snaith. 2014. “The Emergence of Perovskite Solar Cells.” Nature Photonics 8(7):506–14. Retrieved (http://www.nature.com/articles/nphoton.2014.134).
  11. Hinsch, A. et al. 2001. “Long-Term Stability of Dye-Sensitised Solar Cells.” Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 9(6):425–38.
  12. Im, Jeong-Hyeok, Chang-Ryul Lee, Jin-Wook Lee, Sang-Won Park, and Nam-Gyu Park. 2011a. “6.5% Efficient Perovskite Quantum-Dot-Sensitized Solar Cell.” Nanoscale 3(10):4088. Retrieved (http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=c1nr10867k).
  13. Jeon, Nam Joon