Journals / Bilgi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

Explaining the Relationship between Female Labor Force Participation and Divorce in Turkey by means of Panel Regression and Granger Causality

Pages
13–44
Publication Date
2018-12-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Bi-directional causal relationships between the participation of women in the labor force and the crude divorce also exists.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the relationship between the course of divorce and women’s labor force participation in Turkey during 2004-2013 Period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While Trabzon has the highest rate, Mardin has the lowest rate of women participation in the labor force.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Bi-directional causal relationships between the participation of women in the labor force and the crude divorce also exists.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004-2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Women Participation in labor force · Divorce · Panel Regression

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between the course of divorce and women’s labor force participation in Turkey during 2004-2013 Period. While Trabzon has the highest rate, Mardin has the lowest rate of women participation in the labor force. A significant correlation between the participation of women in the labor force and per capita income, crude divorce rate, and added value exists. There is a significant relationship between the participation of women in the labor force and the crude divorce rate. Bi-directional causal relationships between the participation of women in the labor force and the crude divorce also exists.

Özet

This study examines the relationship between the course of divorce and women's labor force participation in Turkey during 2004-2013 Period. While Trabzon has the highest rate, Mardin has the lowest rate of women participation in the labor force. A significant correlation between the participation of women in the labor force and per capita income, crude divorce rate, and added value exists. There is a significant relationship between the participation of women in the labor force and the crude divorce rate. Bi-directional causal relationships between the participation of women in the labor force and the crude divorce also exists.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kutlar, A., Sarıkaya, M., Kabasakal, A. (2018). Explaining the Relationship between Female Labor Force Participation and Divorce in Turkey by means of Panel Regression and Granger Causality. Bilgi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 13–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/78217

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Baltagi, B.H. (2008). Econometrics. Berlin: Springer. Becker, G. S. (1974). A Theory of Marriage Part II. Journal of political economy 82: 511-527.
  2. Becker, G. S. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Hardward University Press.
  3. Bracher, M., Santow, G., Morgan, S.P., and Trussell, J. (1993). Marriage Dissolution in Australia: Models and Explanations. Population Studies 47(3): 403-425.
  4. Cherlin, A. (1979). Work Life and Marital Dissolution. In Levinger G. & O.C. Moles (Eds.), Divorce and Separation. Context, Causes and Consequences. New York: Basic Books. Çarkoğlu, A. and Kalaycıoğlu,E. (2009). The Rising Tide of Conservatism in Turkey, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Demirkan, S.Y. and Günindi A. (2009). Boşanma Nedenleri Araştırması. Ankara: Aile ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Genel Müdürlüğü. De Rose, A. (1992). Socio-Economic Factors and Family Size as Determinants of Marital Dissolution in Italy. European Sociological Review 8(1): 71-79.
  5. Frisco, M. L., and Williams, K. (2003).
  6. Perceived Housework Equity, Marital Happiness, and Divorce in Dual-Earner Households. Journal of Family Issues 24: 51–73.
  7. Glenn, N. and Supancic, M. (1984). Socio-Logical and Demographic Correlates of Divorce and Separation in the United States: An Update and Reconsideration. Journal of Marriage and the Family 46: 563-576. González-Val, R. and Marcén, M. (2012). Breaks in the Breaks: An Analysis of Divorce Rates in Europe. International Review of Law and Economics 32(2): 242–255.
  8. Goode, W. J. (1963). World Revolution and Family Patterns. New York: Free Press.
  9. Goode, W. J. (1971).
  10. Force and Violence in the Family, Journal of Marriage and the Family 33: 624–636.
  11. Göksel, I. (2013). Female Labor Force Participation in Turkey: The Role of Conservatism. Women's Studies International Forum. 41(1): 45–54.
  12. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods. Econometrica 37(3): 424-438.
  13. Gray, J. S. (1998).
  14. Divorce-Law Changes, Household Bargaining, and Married Women’s Labor Supply. The American Economic Review 88(3): 628-642.
  15. Gündüz-Hoşgör, A. and Smits, J. (2008). Variation in Labor Market Participation of Married Women in Turkey. Women's Studies International Forum 31(2): 104–117. IPA, (2015). Regional Competitivess Operational Programme. https://ipa.sanayi.gov.tr/en/content/what-is-regional-competitiveness/113.
  16. Jalovaara, M. (2003). The Joint Effects of Marriage Partners’ Socioeconomic Positions on the Risk of Divorce. Demography 40(1): 6