Journals / Journal of Teacher Education and Educators / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Professional Development Practices and Practitioner Use of Recommended Early Childhood Intervention Practices

Pages
229–246
Publication Date
2019-12-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Implications for in-service professional development are described.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Results from a study of the relationship between different types of professional development practices and early childhood practitioners’ use of 10 different recommended early intervention/early childhood special education practices are reported.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants were 955 practitioners employed in early intervention, preschool, preschool special education, Early Head Start, Head Start, and other early childhood programs in one state in the USA.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Implications for in-service professional development are described.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:professional development · recommended practices · authentic practitioner experiences

Abstract

Results from a study of the relationship between different types of professional development practices and early childhood practitioners’ use of 10 different recommended early intervention/early childhood special education practices are reported. The participants were 955 practitioners employed in early intervention, preschool, preschool special education, Early Head Start, Head Start, and other early childhood programs in one state in the USA. The practitioners were asked to indicate if their school districts, agencies, or programs (1) provided information about recommended practices, (2) had professional development specialists demonstrate the use of the practices for the practitioners, (3) provided practitioners opportunities to learn to use the practices, and (4) practitioners were provided coaching and performance feedback by professional development specialists. Responses to these four types of professional development practices were used to partition practitioners into three subgroups, with each subgroup receiving different combinations of professional development practices. Findings showed that practitioners who reported receiving a combination of all four types of professional development practices reported more frequent use of recommended practices compared to practitioners in the other two groups. Implications for in-service professional development are described.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUNST, C., BRUDER, M. B., MAUDE, S., SCHNURR, M., POLEN, A. V., CLARK, G. F., WİNSLOW, A., GETHMANN, D. (2019). Professional Development Practices and Practitioner Use of Recommended Early Childhood Intervention Practices. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 229–246. https://ajindex.com/articles/780904

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. ReferencesAlexander, P. A. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10-14. doi:10.3102/0013189X032008010 Alsabti, K., Ranka, S., & Singh, V. (1997). An efficient k-means clustering algorithm. Santa Clara, CA: Hitachi America, LTD. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.). (2003). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED440122.pdf.
  2. Browder, D. M., Jimenez, B. A., Mims, P. J., Knight, V. F., Spooner, F., Lee, A., & Flowers, C. (2012). The effects of a "tell-show-try-apply" professional development package on teachers of students with severe developmental disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 35(3), 212-227. doi:10.1177/0888406411432650 Bruder, M. B. (2010). Early childhood intervention: A promise to children and families for their future. Exceptional Children, 76, 339-355.
  3. Bruder, M. B. (2016). Personnel development practices in early childhood intervention. In B. Reichow, B. A. Boyd, E. E. Barton, & S. L. Odom (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood special education (pp. 289-334). Switzerland: Springer International. Bruder, M. B., & Dunst, C. J. (2015). Inservice professional development: Elements associated with effectiveness and implications for practice. Paper presented at the U. S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs Leadership Conference, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.puckett.org/presentations/Inservice-Prof-Dev-Elem-Assoc-Implications-Practices.pdf
  4. Bruder, M. B., Mogro-Wilson, C., Stayton, V., Smith, B. J., & Dietrich, S. (2009). The national status of in-service professional development systems for early intervention and early childhood special education practitioners. Infants and Young Children, 22(1), 13-20. doi:10.1097/01.IYC.0000343333.49775.f8 Cavanaugh, B. (2013). Performance feedback and teachers' use of praise and opportunities to respond: A review of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(1), 111-137. doi:10.1353/etc.2013.0001 Coe, R. (2002, September). It's the effect size, stupid: What effect size is and why it is important. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Exeter, England. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00002182.htm. Co