Journals / International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education / 2009 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

Early Contingency Learning and Child and Teacher Concomitant Social–Emotional Behavior

Erken Koşullu Öğrenme ve Beraberindeki Çocuk ve Öğretmen Duygusal-Sosyal Davranışı

Pages
1–14
Publication Date
2009-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed that the learning games promoted child learning and that collateral child and teacher behavior were predictably associated with operant responding.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The value-added benefits of young children's response-contingent learning were examined in a study of three children (2 females, 1 male) with multiple disabilities and profound developmental delays.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Contingency learning games were used to increase child operant responding, and both the children's and their teachers' concomitant social–emotional behavior associated with operant responding were mapped onto child learning.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed that the learning games promoted child learning and that collateral child and teacher behavior were predictably associated with operant responding.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Response-contingent stimulation · learning games · operant behavior

Abstract

The value-added benefits of young children's response-contingent learning were examined in a study of three children (2 females, 1 male) with multiple disabilities and profound developmental delays. Contingency learning games were used to increase child operant responding, and both the children's and their teachers' concomitant social–emotional behavior associated with operant responding were mapped onto child learning. Results showed that the learning games promoted child learning and that collateral child and teacher behavior were predictably associated with operant responding. The manner in which the findings extend the results from previous research are described.

Özet

Küçük çocuklarda tepki-koşullu öğrenmenin faydaları çoklu yetersizlikleri ve ağır derecede gelişimsel gerilikleri olan üç çocukla (2 kız,1 erkek) gerçekleştirilen bir çalışmada incelenmiştir. Çocuğun edimsel koşullanmasını arttırmak için koşullu öğrenme oyunları kullanılmış ve hem çocukların hem de öğretmenlerin edimsel koşullanmayla bağlantılı eşzamanlı sosyal-duygusal davranışları çocuğun öğrenmesi ile eşleştirilmiştir. Sonuçlar öğrenme oyunlarının çocukların öğrenmesini geliştirdiğini ve karşılıklı öğrenci öğretmen davranışlarının tahmil edilebilecek şekilde edimsel koşullanmayla bağlantılı olduğunu göstermiştir. Bulguların önceki araştırmalardan elde edilen sonuçlara katkısı açıklanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

RAAB, M., DUNST, C. J., WİLSON, L. L., Editörden, E., PARKEY, C. (2009). Early Contingency Learning and Child and Teacher Concomitant Social–Emotional Behavior. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/137849

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.
  2. Dunst, C. J. (1981). Infant learning: A cognitive-linguistic intervention strategy. Allen, TX: DLM. Dunst, C. J. (2007). Social-emotional consequences of response-contingent learning opportunities (Winterberry Research Syntheses Vol. 1, No. 16). Asheville, NC: Winterberry Press.
  3. Dunst, C. J., Cushing, P. J., & Vance, S. D. (1985). Response-contingent learning in profoundly handicapped infants: A social systems perspective. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 33-47.
  4. Dunst, C. J., Raab, M., Trivette, C. M., Parkey, C., Gatens, M., Wilson, L. L., French, J., & Hamby, D. W. (2007). Child and adult social-emotional benefits of response- contingent child learning opportunities. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 4, 379-391.
  5. Dunst, C. J., Raab, M., Trivette, C. M., Wilson, L. L., Hamby, D. W., Parkey, C., Gatens, M., & French, J. (2007). Characteristics of operant learning games associated with optimal child and adult social-emotional consequences [Electronic version]. International Journal of Special Education, 22(2), 13-24.
  6. Dunst, C. J., Raab, M., Wilson, L. L., & Parkey, C. (2007). Relative efficiency of response-contingent and response-independent stimulation on child learning and concomitant behavior. Behavior Analyst Today, 8, 226-236.
  7. Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., Raab, M., & Masiello, T. (2008). Early child contingency learning and detection: Research evidence and implications for practice. Exceptionality, 16, 4-17.
  8. Fagen, J. W. (1993). Reinforcement is not enough: Learned expectancies and infant behavior. American Psychologist, 48, 1153-1155.
  9. Gergely, G., & Watson, J. S. (1999). Early socio-emotional development: Contingency perception and the social-biofeedback model. In P. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life (pp. 101-136).
  10. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Goldberg, S. (1977). Social competence in infancy: A model of parent-infant interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 23, 163-177.
  11. Granic, I. (2000). The self-organization of parent-child relations: Beyond bidirectional models. In M. D. Lewis & I. Granic (Eds.), Emotion, development, and self- organization: Dynamic systems approaches to emotional development (pp. 267- 297). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Griffiths, R. (1954). The abilities of babies: A study in menta