SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Surgery and Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 7

Comparable anatomical and functional success to younger patients in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy patients of older age

Erol ERKAN
Sercan ÇIKRIKCI
Fatih AĞDAŞ
Pages
695–699
Publication Date
2021-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The mean ages of the patients in Groups 1 and 2 were 38.53 (9.55) years and 66.24 (6.36) years, respectively (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aim: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EDCR) has many advantages over the external method, with comparable anatomical and functional success rates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 55 patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) were included in this retrospective cohort study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The mean ages of the patients in Groups 1 and 2 were 38.53 (9.55) years and 66.24 (6.36) years, respectively (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy · Age · Epiphora

Abstract

Background/Aim: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EDCR) has many advantages over the external method, with comparable anatomical and functional success rates. Delayed wound healing is reported to be associated with older age in previous studies. In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of age on the functional and anatomic success of our EDCR results. Methods: A total of 55 patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were managed with either EDCR alone or EDCR combined with nasal septoplasty in our hospital. The patients were divided into two groups as Group 1 (20-54 years old) and Group 2 (55-77 years old) according to age. Results: The mean ages of the patients in Groups 1 and 2 were 38.53 (9.55) years and 66.24 (6.36) years, respectively (P

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKAN, E., ÇIKRIKCI, S., AĞDAŞ, F. (2021). Comparable anatomical and functional success to younger patients in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy patients of older age. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 7, 695–699. https://ajindex.com/articles/779899

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. McDonogh M. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Results in 21 patients. S Afr J Surg. 1992 Sep;30(3):107-10. PMID: 1411802
  2. Presutti L. La dacriocistorinostomia per via endonasale (Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy). Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 1995 Dec;15(6):449-53. Italian. PMID: 8711999
  3. Par I, Pliskvova I, Plch J. Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: Indications, technique and result. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 1998; 54:387-391
  4. Häusler R, Caversaccio M. Microsurgical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with long-term insertion of bicanalicular silicone tubes. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Feb;124(2):188-91. doi: 10.1001/archotol.124.2.188. PMID: 9485111
  5. Fayet B, Racy E, Assouline M. Systematic unciformectomy for a standardized endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology. 2002 Mar;109(3):530-6. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00977-0. PMID: 11874757
  6. Kong YT, Kim TI, Kong BW. A report of 131 cases of endoscopic laser lacrimal surgery. Ophthalmology. 1994 Nov;101(11):1793-800. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31100-6. PMID: 7800358
  7. Bartley GB. Acquired lacrimal drainage obstruction: an etiologic classification system, case reports, and a review of the literature. Part 1. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;8(4):237-42. PMID: 1476972
  8. Olver JM. The success rates for endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Nov;87(11):1431. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.11.1431. PMID: 14609858; PMCID: PMC1771892
  9. Sung JY, Lee YH, Kim KN, Kang TS, Lee SB. Surgical outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: analysis of age effect. Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):19861. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56491-y. PMID: 31882774; PMCID: PMC6934695
  10. Tsirbas A, Wormald PJ. Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jan;87(1):43-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.1.43. PMID: 12488261; PMCID: PMC1771466
  11. Tsirbas A, Wormald PJ. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jan;135(1):76-83. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01830-5. PMID: 12504701
  12. Baek JS, Jeong SH, Lee JH, Choi HS, Kim SJ, Jang JW. Cause and Management of Patients With Failed Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Mar;10(1):85-90. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2016.00192. Epub 2016 Jul 7. PMID: 27384034; PMCID: PMC5327589
  13. Leong SC, Macewen CJ, White PS. A systematic review of outcomes after dacryocystorhinostomy in adults. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010 Jan-Feb;24(1):81-90. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3393. PMID: 2