Journals / Journal of International Health Sciences and Management / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 12

The Assessment of Turkey’s Exposure and Susceptibility to Disasters and Hazards with IDB Indicator System

Pages
40–51
Publication Date
2020-12-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Accordingly, it is necessary to make investments and studies on irregular population growth, population density, poor population rates, agriculture and distribution of continuous products for our provinces with high ESI value.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine the exposure and sensitivity of our country against the increasing natural, technological and man-made disasters with the help of index system and to reveal the deficiencies and competencies in this subject.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data covers the period of 2015, 2016, 2017 and their averages.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Accordingly, it is necessary to make investments and studies on irregular population growth, population density, poor population rates, agriculture and distribution of continuous products for our provinces with high ESI value.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Disaster · Risk Management · Vulnerability

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the exposure and sensitivity of our country against the increasing natural, technological and man-made disasters with the help of index system and to reveal the deficiencies and competencies in this subject. In this way, the study will guide the decision makers in terms of the preparations and work to be done against disasters. The study was prepared with a semi-numerical method and the scope of the study was all provinces of our country. The data covers the period of 2015, 2016, 2017 and their averages. The ESI (Exposure and Susceptibility Index) consists of 8 sub-factors and the index value is between 0 and 1. Classification of index values was done according to international standards as follows; between 0-0.20 as low, between 0.20-0.40 as medium, between 0.40-0.80 as high and between 0.80-1.00 as very high. In the results of the study; in terms of exposure and sensitivity, 14.82% of Turkey provinces were in high, 81.47% were in the middle category and 3.70% were in the low category. It is noteworthy that among the provinces in the high category, large cities such as İstanbul (0.58), Adana (0.44), İzmir (0.42), Gaziantep (0.41) and Şanlıurfa (0.40) took place. In the international arena, the calculation is made out of 20 countries that Turkey has the lowest 10th countries. In addition, Turkey's ES Index value is below the average compared to the general average of the countries. Accordingly, it is necessary to make investments and studies on irregular population growth, population density, poor population rates, agriculture and distribution of continuous products for our provinces with high ESI value.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAPRAK, Ü., ŞAHİNÖZ, T., ŞAHİNÖZ, S. (2020). The Assessment of Turkey’s Exposure and Susceptibility to Disasters and Hazards with IDB Indicator System. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 12, 40–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/777394

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. AFAD (Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (DEMP)), (2009), Açıklamalı Afet Yönetimi Terimleri Sözlüğü (Disaster Management Glossary with Explanations), https://www.afad.gov.tr/tr/23972, Erişim Tarihi (Date of Access): 15.04.2019. BID. 2010a. Indicadores de Riesgo de Desastre y de Gestión de Riesgos (Argentina). Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
  2. Washington. IDB. 2010a. Indicators for Disaster Risk and Risk Management (Barbados). Inter-American Development Bankü
  3. Washington. BID. 2010c. Indicadores de Riesgo de Desastre y de Gestión de Riesgos (Costa Rica). Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
  4. Washington. BID. 2010d. Indicadores de Riesgo de Desastre y de Gestión de Riesgos (Ecuador). Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
  5. Washington. BID. 2010e. Indicadores de Riesgo de Desastre y de Gestión de Riesgos (República Domicana). Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
  6. Washington. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
  7. IDB. 2018. Indicators for Disaster Risk and Risk Management (Suriname). Inter-American Development Bank
  8. Washington. BID. 2015a. Indicadores de Riesgo de Desastre y de Gestión de Riesgos (Chile). Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
  9. Washington. BID. 2015b. Indicadores de Riesgo de Desastre y de Gestión de Riesgos (México). Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
  10. Washington. BID. 2015c. Indicadores de Riesgo de Desastre y de Gestión de Riesgos (Nicaragua). Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
  11. Washington. BID. 2015d. Indicadores de Riesgo de Desastre y de Gestión de Riesgos (Panamá). Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
  12. Washington. BID. 2015e. Indicadores de Riesgo de Desastre y de Gestión de Riesgos (Perú). Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
  13. Washington. BIRKMANN Jörn, (2006), Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and definitions, UNU-Press, Tokyo. BIRKMANN Jörn, (2006), Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and definitions, UNU-Press, Tokyo. CARDONA Omar Dario
  14. , “A System of Indicators for Disaster Risk Management in the Americas” in Measuring Vulnerability to Hazards of Natural Origin: Towards Disaster Resilient Societies, United Nations University Press, Tokyo. CARREÑO Martha Liliana, CARDONA Omar Dario and BARBAT Alex H.
  15. , Sistema de indicadores para la evaluación de riesgos, Centro Internacional de Métodos Numéricos en Ingenieria, Barcelona. CARREÑO Martha Liliana, CARDONA Omar Dario and BARBAT Alex H.
  16. , Sistema de indicadores para la