Journals / Journal of International Health Sciences and Management / 2026 / Volume: 12

Probabilistic Fiscal Monitoring and Reverse Threshold Analysis of Türkiye’s Public Health Administration under High Inflation

İlknur Arslan Aras(YÜKSEK İHTİSAS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4030-0158
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Outputs are not official forecasts, causal estimates or audit findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Public health administrations face correlated revenue, labour-cost and supply-price uncertainty, yet consolidated financial statements are usually interpreted through retrospective point estimates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study evaluates an integrated decision-support framework for fiscal monitoring without treating accounting outcomes as measures of managerial performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Outputs are not official forecasts, causal estimates or audit findings.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2024–2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Fiscal Sustainability · Public Health Finance · Monte Carlo Simulation

Abstract

Background: Public health administrations face correlated revenue, labour-cost and supply-price uncertainty, yet consolidated financial statements are usually interpreted through retrospective point estimates. This study evaluates an integrated decision-support framework for fiscal monitoring without treating accounting outcomes as measures of managerial performance. Materials and Methods: The Turkish Ministry of Health’s comparable 2024–2025 consolidated accrual statements were analysed. Reported and researcher-defined core balances were reconciled; concentration was measured; and the change in core coverage was decomposed using a two-factor Shapley method. Three conditional 2026 scenarios were assessed using 100,000 correlated beta-PERT draws per scenario with Latin hypercube sampling. Outcomes included coverage, Fiscal-at-Risk, expected shortfall, reverse revenue thresholds and global sensitivity. Results: Core coverage increased from 47.75% to 49.49%, although the core financing gap rose from TRY 635.7 billion to TRY 867.0 billion. Revenue growth contributed 18.86 percentage points to coverage, while expenditure growth offset 17.12 points. Labour-related costs represented 67.28% of 2025 core expenditure, and one revenue class represented 83.68% of gross revenue. In the baseline scenario, the median modelled gap was TRY 1,205.6 billion and Fiscal-at-Risk at 95% was TRY 1,324.5 billion. Under managed disinflation, coverage improved in most draws while the nominal gap widened. Conclusions: The framework reveals a practically important divergence between proportional coverage and absolute financing need and converts static accounts into transparent, scenario-conditioned risk measures. Outputs are not official forecasts, causal estimates or audit findings.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aras, İ. A. (2026). Probabilistic Fiscal Monitoring and Reverse Threshold Analysis of Türkiye’s Public Health Administration under High Inflation. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management, Volume: 12. https://doi.org/10.48121/jihsam.2004419

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Aikman, D., Angotti, R., & Budnik, K. (2024). Stress testing with multiple scenarios: A tale on tails and reverse stress scenarios (ECB Working Paper No. 2941). European Central Bank.
  2. Barbera, C., Guarini, E., & Steccolini, I. (2020). How do governments cope with austerity? The roles of accounting in shaping governmental financial resilience. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(3), 529–558. [https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2018-3739](https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2018-3739)
  3. Barbera, C., Jones, M., Korac, S., Saliterer, I., & Steccolini, I. (2017). Governmental financial resilience under austerity in Austria, England and Italy: How do local governments cope with financial shocks? Public Administration, 95(3), 670–697. [https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12350](https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12350)
  4. Briggs, A. H., Weinstein, M. C., Fenwick, E. A. L., Karnon, J., Sculpher, M. J., & Paltiel, A. D. (2012). Model parameter estimation and uncertainty: A report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-6. Medical Decision Making, 32(5), 722–732. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X12458348](https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X12458348)
  5. Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye. (2026). Inflation report 2026-II. [https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/EN/TCMB+EN/Main+Menu/Publications/Reports/Inflation+Report/2026/Inflation+Report+2026+-+II/](https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/EN/TCMB+EN/Main+Menu/Publications/Reports/Inflation+Report/2026/Inflation+Report+2026+-+II/)
  6. Chan, J. L. (2003). Government accounting: An assessment of theory, purposes and standards. Public Money & Management, 23(1), 13–20. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00336](https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00336)
  7. Kutzin, J. (2013). Health financing for universal coverage and health system performance: Concepts and implications for policy. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91(8), 602–611. [https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.12.113985](https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.12.113985)
  8. Liaropoulos, L., & Goranitis, I. (2015). Health care financing and the sustainability of health systems. International Journal for Equity in Health, 14, 80. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0208-5](https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0208-5)
  9. Lorenzoni, L., Dougherty, S., de Biase, P., & McCarthy, T. (2023). Assessing the future fiscal sustainability of health spending in Ireland (OECD Health Working Papers No. 161). OECD Publishing. [https://doi.org/10.1787/1f5fadbc-en](https://doi.org/10.1787/1f5fadbc-en)
  10. Ministry of Health, Republic of Türkiye. (2026). 2025 consolidated balance sheet and operating results statement. Strategy Development Directorate. [https://sgb.saglik.gov.tr/TR-59239/mali-tablolar.html](https://sgb.saglik.gov.tr/TR-59239/mali-tablolar.html)
  11. Mohd Fadzil, M., Wan Puteh, S. E., Aizuddin, A. N., Ahmed, Z., Muhamad, N. A., & Harith, A. A. (2023). Cost volume profit analysis for full paying patient services in Malaysia: A study protocol. PLOS ONE, 18(11), e0294623. [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294623](https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294623)
  12. O’Hagan, A., Stevenson, M., & Madan, J. (2007). Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis for patient-level simulation models: Efficient estimation of mean and variance using ANOVA. Health Economics, 16(10), 1009–1023. [https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1199](https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1199)
  13. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Fiscal sustainability of health systems: How to finance more resilient health systems when money is tight? OECD Publishing. [https://doi.org/10.1787/880f3195-en](https://doi.org/10.1787/880f3195-en)
  14. Rajala, T., & Jalonen, H. (2023). Stress tests for public service resilience: Introducing the possible-worlds thinking. Public Management Review, 25(4), 762–786. [https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2048686](https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2048686)
  15. Ranger, N., Mahul, O., & Monasterolo, I. (2021). Managing the financial risks of climate change and pandemics: What we know and do not know. One Earth, 4(10), 1375–1385. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.09.017](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.09.017)
  16. Rao, M., Musso, J. A., & Young, M. M. (2023). Resist, recover, renew: Fiscal resilience as a strategic response to economic uncertainty. The American Review of Public Administration, 53(7–8), 296–315. [https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740231186424](https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740231186424)
  17. Suarez, V., Lesneski, C., & Denison, D. (2011). Making the case for using financial indicators in local public health agencies. American Journal of Public Health, 101(3), 419–425. [https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2010.194555](https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2010.194555)
  18. Sullivan, S. D., Mauskopf, J. A., Augustovski, F., Caro, J. J., Lee, K. M., Minchin, M., Orlewska, E., Penna, P., Rodriguez Barrios, J.-M., & Shau, W.-Y. (2014). Budget impact analysis—Principles of good practice: Report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force. Value in Health, 17(1), 5–14. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.2291](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.2291)
  19. Turkish Statistical Institute. (2026). Consumer price index, December 2025 [Press release]. [https://veriportali.tuik.gov.tr/en/press/58294](https://veriportali.tuik.gov.tr/en/press/58294)
  20. World Bank. (2024). Health financing sustainability and resilience assessment framework. World Bank.
  21. World Health Organization. (2010). The world health report: Health systems financing—The path to universal coverage. World Health Organization.
  22. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. (2025). Budget execution in health: Kyrgyzstan case study. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.
  23. Younis, M. Z., Jaber, S., Smith, P. C., Hartmann, M., & Bongyu, M. (2010). The determinants of hospital cost: A cost–volume–profit analysis of health services in the Occupied Territories: Palestine. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 18(3), 167–173. [https://doi.org/10.1211/ijpp.18.03.0006](https://doi.org/10.1211/ijpp.18.03.0006)
  24. Zurynski, Y., Herkes-Deane, J., Holt, J., McPherson, E., Lamprell, G., Dammery, G., Meulenbroeks, I., Halim, N., & Braithwaite, J. (2022). How can the healthcare system deliver sustainable performance? A scoping review. BMJ Open, 12(5), e059207. [https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059207](https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059207)