SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

The effect of flipped classroom approach on learning achievement, online self-regulation and interaction in synchronous distance education

Seda AKTI ASLAN
Pages
535–552
Publication Date
2022-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results revealed that while flipped classroom approach in an online synchronous course positively influenced students’ self-regulation skills and the interaction level, it did not affect students’ learning achievement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A quasi-experimental design was employed to examine the effects of flipped classroom approach on students’ academic achievement, self-regulation skills, and interaction level in synchronous distance education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants consisted of 50 undergraduate students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results revealed that while flipped classroom approach in an online synchronous course positively influenced students’ self-regulation skills and the interaction level, it did not affect students’ learning achievement.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Flipped Learning · Interaction · Synchronous Distance Education

Abstract

A quasi-experimental design was employed to examine the effects of flipped classroom approach on students’ academic achievement, self-regulation skills, and interaction level in synchronous distance education. The participants consisted of 50 undergraduate students. In an online synchronous course, the Zoom application and its breakout rooms were used. For ten weeks, students were asked to attend the course two times each week. For data collection, learning achievement test, online self-regulation scale, and online course interaction level determination scale were administered. The results revealed that while flipped classroom approach in an online synchronous course positively influenced students’ self-regulation skills and the interaction level, it did not affect students’ learning achievement.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, S. A. (2022). The effect of flipped classroom approach on learning achievement, online self-regulation and interaction in synchronous distance education. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 535–552. https://ajindex.com/articles/776013

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher education research & development, 34(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
  2. Agbatogun, A. O. (2014). Developing learners' second language communicative competence through active learning: Clickers or communicative approach? Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 257-269. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.2.257
  3. Ainley, M., & Patrick, L. (2006). Measuring self-regulated learning processes through tracking patterns of student interaction with achievement activities. Educational Psychology Review, 18(3), 267-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9018-z
  4. Akdoğan, D., Velipaşaoğlu, S., & Musal, B. (2016). Self-regulated learning. Pamukkale Medical Journal, 9(3), 254-260. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/patd/issue/35386/393026
  5. Algarni, B. (2018). A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of flipped classroom in mathematics education. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on education and new learning technologies (pp. 7970–7976). https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2018.1852
  6. Ali, A., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Key factors for determining students' satisfaction in distance learning courses: A study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6047
  7. Altaii, K., Reagle, C. J., & Handley, M. K. (2017). Flipping an engineering thermodynamics course to improve student self-efficacy. In Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/28368
  8. Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 4(2), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149
  9. Andersson, A., & Hatakka, M. (2010). Increasing interactivity in distance educations: Case studies Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. Information Technology for Development, 16(1), 16-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681100903533719
  10. Aydın, S.& Atalay, T.D. (2015). Öz-düzenlemeli öğrenme. Ankara:
  11. Pegem Akademi. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
  12. Barnard, L., Paton, V., & Lan, W. (2008). Online self-regulatory learning behaviors as a mediator in the relationship between online c