SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Advanced Education Studies / 2021 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

The Role of Conflict Resolution Styles, Communication Pattern and Sexual Satisfaction as Predictors of How to Consider Divorce in Married Individuals

Evli Bireylerde Boşanmayı Düşünüp Düşünmemenin Yordayıcısı Olarak Çatışma Çözme Stilleri, İletişim Örüntüsü ve Cinsel Doyumun Rolü

Demet YÜKSEL GEN
Mehmet GÖKTAŞ
Beril ŞENDOĞAN
Pages
86–107
Publication Date
2021-12-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis, it is seen that the sub-dimensions of conflict resolution styles (positive conflict, negative conflict, submission and withdrawal), aggressive communication pattern, destructive communication pattern and sexual satisfaction are effective in correctly classifying married individuals who are considering divorce or not.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study is to determine the conflict resolution styles, communication patterns and sexual satisfaction what extent truly classify married individuals' thinking about divorce and not thinking about divorce.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research group consists of 396 married people.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis, it is seen that the sub-dimensions of conflict resolution styles (positive conflict, negative conflict, submission and withdrawal), aggressive communication pattern, destructive communication pattern and sexual satisfaction are effective in correctly classifying married individuals who are considering divorce or not.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:boşanma · çatışma çözme · iletişim örüntüsü

Abstract

The aim of the study is to determine the conflict resolution styles, communication patterns and sexual satisfaction what extent truly classify married individuals' thinking about divorce and not thinking about divorce. The research group consists of 396 married people. In this study, those who think about divorce and those who do not are divided into two categories and Binary Logistic Regression analysis was performed to classify these groups by sub-dimensions of conflict resolution styles, aggressive communication pattern, destructive communication pattern and sexual satisfaction variables. Conflict Resolution Styles Scale, Communication Styles Scale and Golombok-Rust Sexual Satisfaction Scale were used for data collection. As a result of the analysis, it is seen that the sub-dimensions of conflict resolution styles (positive conflict, negative conflict, submission and withdrawal), aggressive communication pattern, destructive communication pattern and sexual satisfaction are effective in correctly classifying married individuals who are considering divorce or not.

Özet

Araştırmanın amacı çatışma çözme stilleri, iletişim örüntüsü ve cinsel doyumun evli bireylerin boşanmayı düşünme ve düşünmeme durumlarını ne derece doğru sınıflandırdığını belirlemektir. Araştırma grubu evli 396 kişiden oluşmaktadır. Bu çalışmada boşanmayı düşünenler ve düşünmeyenler iki kategoriye ayrılmışlar ve bu grupların çatışma çözme stillerinin alt boyutları, saldırgan iletişim örüntüsü, yıkıcı iletişim örüntüsü ve cinsel doyum değişkenleri tarafından sınıflandırılmasına yönelik Binary Lojistik Regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Çatışma Çözüm Stilleri Ölçeği, İletişim Şekilleri Ölçeği ve Golombok-Rust Cinsel Doyum Ölçeği veri toplamada kullanılmıştır. Yapılan analiz sonucunda çatışma çözme stillerinin alt boyutları (olumlu çatışma, olumsuz çatışma, boyun eğme ve geri çekilme), saldırgan iletişim örüntüsü, yıkıcı iletişim örüntüsü ve cinsel doyumun boşanmayı düşünen ve düşünmeyen evli bireyleri doğru sınıflandırmada etkili olduğu görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GEN, D. Y., GÖKTAŞ, M., ŞENDOĞAN, B. (2021). The Role of Conflict Resolution Styles, Communication Pattern and Sexual Satisfaction as Predictors of How to Consider Divorce in Married Individuals. Journal of Advanced Education Studies, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 86–107. https://ajindex.com/articles/773262

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Babin, E.A. (2013). An examination of predictors of nonverbal and verbal communication of pleasure during sex and sexual satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 270-292.
  2. Benokraitis, N.V. (1993). Marriages and families. Prentice Hall. Boyacıoğlu, G.S. (1999). Kadın cinsel işlev bozuklukları. Psikiyatri Dünyası, 3(2), 54-59.
  3. Butzer, B., & Campbell, L. (2008). Adult attachment, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction: A study of married couples. Personal Relationships, 15(1), 141-154.
  4. Burleson, B.R., & Denton, W. H. (1997). The relationship between communication skills and marital satisfaction: some moderating effects, Journal of Marriage and Family, 59(4), 884-902.
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2020). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri, (28. bs.). Ankara:
  6. Pegem Akademi. Byers, E. S. (2005). Relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal study of individuals in long‐term relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 42(2), 113-118.
  7. Carrere, S., & Gottman, J. M. (1999). Predicting divorce among newlyweds from the first three minutes of a marital conflict discussion. Family Process,38(3), 293-301.
  8. Christensen, A., & Heavey, C.L. (1990). Gender and social structure in demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 73-81.
  9. Christensen, A., & Shenk, J. (1991). Communication, conflict and psycological distance in nondistressed, clinic and divorcing couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 458-463. Cleek M.G., & Pearson T. A. (1985). Perceived causes of divorce: An analysis of interrelationships. J Marriage Fam, 47, 179-183.
  10. Crowe, M. (1995). Couple Therapy and sexual dysfunction. International Review of Psychiatry, 7, 195-205.
  11. Çağ, P., & Yıldırım, İ. (2013). Evlilik doyumunu yordayan i̇lişkisel ve kişisel değişkenler. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(39), 13-23.
  12. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2021). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara:
  13. Pegem Akademi. Dhir, K.S., & Markman, H.J. (1984). Application of social judgement theory to understanding and treating marital conflict. Journal Of Marriage And The Family, 46(3), 597-610.
  14. Dokur, M., & Profeta, Y. (2006). Aile ve çift terapisi. İstanbul:
  15. Morpa Kültür Yayınları.
  16. Donnelly, D. A. (1993). Sexually inactive marriages. The Journal of Sex Research, 30(2), 171-179.
  17. Driver, J., Tabar