Journals / İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Determination of Immunization Status of Pregnant Women Who Attending The Family Health Center

Aile Sağlığı Merkezine Başvuran Gebelerin Bağışıklama Durumlarının Belirlenmesi

Pages
77–83
Publication Date
2021-05-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a significant difference in the pregnant women's education, the level of income, and the employment status, as well as the status of last years’ attendance at the family health center, the planning status of the pregnancy, and the status of obtaining information about vaccines and having a vaccination card (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the immunization status of pregnant women who attend family health centers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Descriptive- comparative research design was carried out with 1027 pregnant women interviewed in 10 family health centers in the İzmir central district region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a significant difference in the pregnant women's education, the level of income, and the employment status, as well as the status of last years’ attendance at the family health center, the planning status of the pregnancy, and the status of obtaining information about vaccines and having a vaccination card (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bağışıklama · Gebelik · Gebe

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the immunization status of pregnant women who attend family health centers. Material and Method: Descriptive- comparative research design was carried out with 1027 pregnant women interviewed in 10 family health centers in the İzmir central district region. The data was collected with the interview form. Number, percentage, variance, and chi-square analysis were used to analyze the results. Results: The pregnant women’s average age was 27.96±4.89, 43.9% of the pregnant women were high school graduates. The median number of pregnancies was two, and the number of live births was one. Of the pregnant women, 82.2% received information about immunization, and 75.8% received information from healthcare workers. Of the pregnant women, 37.8% reported that they did not have an immunization card. During pregnancy, 63.2% of pregnant women were vaccinated against tetanus, 10.3% against hepatitis B, 11.9% against influenza, 3.4% against pneumococcus, and 3.0% against rabies. There was a significant difference in the pregnant women's education, the level of income, and the employment status, as well as the status of last years’ attendance at the family health center, the planning status of the pregnancy, and the status of obtaining information about vaccines and having a vaccination card (p

Özet

Amaç: Araştırmanın amacı, aile sağlığı merkezlerine başvuran gebelerin bağışıklama durumlarının belirlenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Karşılaştırmalı-tanımlayıcı desendeki araştırma, İzmir merkez ilçesinde yer alan 10 aile sağlığı merkezinde görüşülen 1021 gebe ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler, görüşme formu ile toplanmıştır. Veriler sayı, yüzde, varyans ve ki-kare analizi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Gebelerin yaş ortalaması 27,96±4,89 olup %43,9’u lise mezunudur. Gebelik sayısı medyanı iki ve canlı doğum sayısı birdir. Gebelerin %82,2’si aşılanma ile ilgili bilgi almış olup, bunlardan %75,8’inin bilgi kaynağı sağlık çalışanlarıdır. Gebelerin %37,8’i aşı kartı olmadığını bildirmiştir. Gebelik döneminde gebelerin %63,2’si tetanoz, %10,3’ü hepatit B, %11,9’u grip, %3,4’ü pnömokok, %3,0’ü kuduz aşısı yaptırmıştır. Gebelerin eğitim, gelir düzeyi, çalışma durumu, son bir yılda aile sağlığı merkezine gelme durumu, planlı gebelik durumu ile aşılarla ilgili bilgi alma ve aşı kartı bulunma durumu arasında anlamlı fark olduğu saptanmıştır (p

🔖

Cite This Article

DERELİ, F., KUNDAKÇI, G. A., YILDIRIM, J. G., UYANIK, G., YILMAZ, M. (2021). Determination of Immunization Status of Pregnant Women Who Attending The Family Health Center. İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 77–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/772758

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Bisset KA, Paterson P. Strategies for increasing uptake of vaccination in pregnancy in high-income countries: a systematic review. Vaccine [Internet]. 2018;36(20):2751–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.013
  2. Maertens K, Orije MRP, Van Damme P, Leuridan E. Vaccination during pregnancy: current and possible future recommendations. Eur J Pediatr. 2020;179(2):235–42. cdc.gov [Internet]. Guidelines for Vaccinating Pregnant Women; 2016 [cited 2016 Aug ]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pregnancy/hcp-toolkit/guidelines.html. Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety. Safety of immunization during pregnancy a review of the evidence. World Health Organization. [homepage on the Internet] 2014. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/241397/pdf
  3. Moniz MH, Beigi RH. Maternal immunization. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014 Sep;10(9):2562–70. World Health Organization. Protecting all against tetanus: guide to sustaining maternal and neonatal tetanus elimination (MNTE) and broadening tetanus protection for all populations. [homepage on the Internet] 2019. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329882/9789241515610-eng.pdf Bakanlığı TC. Sağlık. Genişletilmiş bağışıklama programı genelgesi. 2009/17 2009. Available from: https://www.saglik.gov.tr/TR,11137/ genisletilmis-bagisiklama-programi-genelgesi-2009.html. Vishram B, Letley L, Jan Van Hoek A, Silverton L, Donovan H, Adams C, et al. Vaccination in pregnancy: Attitudes of nurses, midwives and health visitors in England. Hum Vaccines Immunother [Internet]. 2018;14(1):179– 88. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1382789
  4. Kahn KE, Black CL, Ding H, Williams WW, Lu P-J, Fiebelkorn AP, et al. Influenza and tdap vaccination coverage among pregnant women United States, April 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(38):1055–9.
  5. Ditsungnoen D, Greenbaum A, Praphasiri P, Dawood FS, Thompson MG, Yoocharoen P, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs related to season influenza among pregnant women in Thailand. Vaccine. 2017;34(18):2141–6.
  6. Sel G, Balcı S, Aynalı B, Novruzva K, Akdemir AY, Harma M, et al. Gebelerin grip aşısı yaptırmama nedenleri üzerine kesitsel çalışma. STED / Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Derg. 2020;29(0000):0–2.
  7. Kul G, Erdoğan N. Influenza vaccination status and factors affecting vaccination rate in pregnant women. Anadolu Klin Tıp Bilim Derg. 2020;0–1.
  8. Abir T, Ogbo FA, Stevens GJ, Page AN, Milton AH, Agho KE. The impact of