SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF “DEBRIEFING EXPERIENCE SCALE” IN SIMULATION-BASED LEARNING

SİMÜLASYONA DAYALI ÖĞRENMEDE “ÇÖZÜMLEME DENEYİM ÖLÇEĞİ”NİN TÜRKÇE VERSİYONUNUN GEÇERLİK GÜVENİRLİĞİ

Yasemin USLU
Hilal TÜZER
Tülay BAŞAK
Vildan KOCATEPE
Merve KANIĞ
Vesile ÜNVER
Ükke KARABACAK
Bahar İNKAYA
Tuba YILMAZER
Pages
480–494
Publication Date
2022-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The test-retest intraclass coefficient (ICC) was 0.999 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The most important phase of simulation-based learning is “debriefing”.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main purpose of a debriefing session is to have participants review their own performances and identify the attainments they achieved during the simulation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The test-retest intraclass coefficient (ICC) was 0.999 (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2017–2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Simülasyon · Hemşirelik eğitimi · Çözümleme

Abstract

The most important phase of simulation-based learning is “debriefing”. The main purpose of a debriefing session is to have participants review their own performances and identify the attainments they achieved during the simulation. This study performed the validity and reliability test of the Turkish version of the “Debriefing Experience Scale”. The universe of the study consisted of students (N=303) from the Nursing Department of a university during the 2017–2018 academic year. Content validity, construct validity, and internal consistency reliability of the Debriefing Experience Scale were tested. The Cronbach’s alpha level of the scale was found to be 0.948 for “Experience with Debriefing” and 0.951 for “Importance of item”. The test-retest intraclass coefficient (ICC) was 0.999 (p

Özet

Simülasyona dayalı öğretimin en önemli aşaması “Çözümleme”dir. Çözümleme oturumunda ana hedef katılımcının kendi performanslarını gözden geçirmeleri ve simülasyon sırasında elde ettikleri kazanımlarının farkına varmalarıdır. Bu çalışma “Çözümleme Deneyim Ölçeği’nin Türkçe Geçerlik Güvenirliği” ni yapmak amacıyla metodolojik olarak yapıldı. Çalışmanın evrenini 2017-2018 yılında İstanbul’da bulunan bir üniversitenin hemşirelik bölümünde öğrenim gören öğrenciler (N=303) oluşturdu. Çözümleme Deneyim Ölçeğinin içerik geçerliliği, yapı geçerliliği, iç tutarlılık güvenilirliği test edildi. Ölçeğin total Cronbach alfa düzeyi “Çözümleme Deneyimi” için 0.948 olup, “Maddelerin Önemi” için ise 0.951’dır. Test-tekrar test sınıf içi korelasyon katsayısı (ICC) 0,999 idi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

USLU, Y., TÜZER, H., BAŞAK, T., KOCATEPE, V., KANIĞ, M., ÜNVER, V., KARABACAK, Ü., İNKAYA, B., YILMAZER, T. (2022). VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF “DEBRIEFING EXPERIENCE SCALE” IN SIMULATION-BASED LEARNING. Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 480–494. https://ajindex.com/articles/769898

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Alderman, J. (2012). Using simulation to teach nursing students and licensed clinicians obstetric emergencies. The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 37(6), 394-400. https://doi.org/ 10.1097/NMC.0b013e318264bbe7. Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio: Revisiting the Original Methods of Calculation. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 47(1), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808.
  2. Burns, N., & Groves, K. (2003). Practice of nursing research (3th edition ed.): WB. Saunders Company, USA. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007).
  3. Statistics, Research Design, Spss Applications and Interpretation. In Data Analysis Handbook for Sciences. (pp. 100-350). Ankara:
  4. Pegem Academy Publishing. Cantrell, M. A. (2008). The importance of debriefing in clinical simulations. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 4(2), e19-e23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2008.06.006.
  5. Chronister, C., & Brown, D. (2012). Comparison of simulation debriefing methods. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8(7), e281-e288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2010.12.005.
  6. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Multivariate Statistics for Social Sciences: SPSS and Lisrel Applications. (2nd edt ed.). Ankara:
  7. Pegem Academy Publishing. Decker, S., Sportsman, S., Puetz, L., & Billings, L. (2008). The evolution of simulation and its contribution to competency. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 39(2), 74-80. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20080201-06. dos Santos Almeida, R., Mazzo, A., Amado Martins, J. C., Dias Coutinho, V. R., Jorge, B. M., & Costa Mendes, I. A. (2016). Validation to Portuguese of the Debriefing Experience Scale. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 69(4), 658-664. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167.2016690413i
  8. Dreifuerst, K. T. (2012). Using debriefing for meaningful learning to foster development of clinical reasoning in simulation. Journal of Nursing Education, 51(6), 326-333. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20120409-02.
  9. Eppich, W., & Cheng, A. (2015). Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simulation in Healthcare, 10(2), 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000072.
  10. Esin, M. N. (2014). Data Collection Methods and Tools & Reliability and Validity of Data Collection Tools. In S. Erdoğan, N. Nahcivan, & M. N. Esin (Eds.), Nursing Research. İstanbul: Nobel Medical Bookstores. Harder,