Journals / International Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership / 2018 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of College Students’ Capability of Self-Leadership

Pages
32–39
Publication Date
2018-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, in scope of the study, the researcher analyzed the self-leadership abilities of the departments, and observed significant differences on self-leadership abilities considering demographic and departmental differences.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Self-leadership means, in a common sense, “the process of leading one’s self with the achievements of individual and organizational success for gaining self- motivation.” Self-leadership is also a concept that is linked and nested with one’s self- motivating efforts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Researchers seem to have adopted three self-leading strategies including behavior- oriented, natural reward, and creative idea model strategies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, in scope of the study, the researcher analyzed the self-leadership abilities of the departments, and observed significant differences on self-leadership abilities considering demographic and departmental differences.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Self-leadership · Leadership of oneself · Leading oneself

Abstract

Self-leadership means, in a common sense, “the process of leading one’s self with the achievements of individual and organizational success for gaining self- motivation.” Self-leadership is also a concept that is linked and nested with one’s self- motivating efforts. Self-leadership forms the basis of participative leadership as a type of leadership closely associated with the perception of gaining benefits from oneself. So primarily people should be able to lead themselves and, later on, they must be able to share the process with other individuals. Researchers seem to have adopted three self-leading strategies including behavior- oriented, natural reward, and creative idea model strategies. In the present study, private and public sector employees of different fields of operation were evaluated applying self-leadership scales. The objective of the study is to compare the self-leadership abilities of students from various university departments. In the study, factors affecting self-leadership were determined by implementing the self-leadership scale to 148 students from different departments. In addition, a reliability and factor analysis tests were conducted. In results of the study, Cronbach’s-Alfa rates were determined as 0.89 for all subjects, which is highly reliable. The number of the factors were gathered under 8 titles in the Turkish version of the scale while the original had 9 factors. In the present study, the factors “determining the target” and “evaluating opinions/ideas” were excluded, and the items were gathered under 7 factors. These factors include imagination of successful performance, self-punishment, assigning reminders for yourself, talking to yourself, self-observation, focusing on natural awards, and the reliability coefficients of these factors are respectively 0.868, 0.761, 0.742, 0.819, 0.783, 0.712 and 0.767. Moreover, in scope of the study, the researcher analyzed the self-leadership abilities of the departments, and observed significant differences on self-leadership abilities considering demographic and departmental differences.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖR, H., ERBAY, H., ENGİN, M., AKSOY, H. (2018). Investigation of College Students’ Capability of Self-Leadership. International Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 32–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/769603

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Alves, Jose C. et al. (2006). “A Cross-Cultural Perspective of Self-Leadership”. Journal of Managerial Psychology 21(4), 338-359.
  2. Bandura, A. (1986),
  3. Social Cognitive Theory, Free Press,
  4. New York, NY. Bass, B.M., ve B.J. Avalio (1992). Multifactor leadership questionnaire-short form 65.Binghamton,NY: Center for leadership Studies. Burns, J.M., (1978).
  5. Leadership, Harper & Row Publishers,
  6. New York. Burns D. D. (1980) Feeling good: The New Mood Therapy. William Morrow, New York. Carson, Jay B., Paul E. Tesluk ve Jennifer A. Marrone (2007). “Shared Leadership in Teams: An Investigation of Antecedent Conditions and Performance”. Academy of Management Review 50(5): 1217-1234.
  7. Davis, K., (1988). İşletmede İnsan Davranışı, 5.Baskıdan Çeviri, (Çev. Kemal Tosun, Tomris Somay, Fulya Aykar, Can Baysal, Ömer Sadullah ve Semra Yalçın), İstanbul. D’Intino R. S., Goldsby M. G., Houghton J. D. and Neck C. P. (2007) Self- Leadership: A Process for Entrepreneurial Succes. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 13(4), 105-120.
  8. Ellis A. (1977), The Basic Clinical Theory of Rational Emotive Therapy. Springer, New York. Eren, E., (1998). Örgütsel Davranış ve Yönetim Psikolojisi, 5.Baskı,
  9. Beta Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  10. Houghton, J. D. & Neck, C. P. (2002). The revised self-leadership questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 672-691.
  11. Houghton, J. D. & Yoho, S. K. (2005). Toward a contingency model of leadership and psychological empowerment: when should self-leadership be encouraged?. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(4), 65-83.
  12. Kerr, S. and J.M. Jermier, (1978). “Substitutes for Leadership: Their Meaning and Measurement”, Organization Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375- 403. Latham, G. P. and Locke, E. A. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Lovelace K. J., Manz C. C. and Alves J.C. (2007) Work Stress and Leadership Development: The Role of Self-leadership Shared Leadership Physical Fitness and Flow in Managing Demands and Increasing Job Control. Human Resource Management Review 17(4): 374-387.
  13. Manz C. C. and Jr Sims H. P. (1980). Self-Management as a Substitute for Leadership: A Social Learning Theory Perspective. Academy of Management Review 5(3): 361-367.
  14. Manz C. C. (1986). Self-Leadership: Toward An Expanded Theory of Self- Influence Processes in Organizations. Academy of Management Review 11(3): 585-600.
  15. Manz, C. (199