Journals / International Journal of Sport Culture and Science / 2017 / Cilt 5 - Sayı 2

Effect of Repeated Carbohydrate Mouth Rinsing on Female’s Sprint Power Output

Pages
102–111
Publication Date
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As for RPE, BG, BL and HR parameters, there wasn’t statistical significance between trials though.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Rinsing of carbohydrate in the oral cavity has been shown to improve performance especially in endurance type activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The exact mechanism responsible for this ergogenic effect remains unestablished but it is speculated that related to carbohydrate receptors in oral cavity which increase neural drive.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As for RPE, BG, BL and HR parameters, there wasn’t statistical significance between trials though.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cycling performance · mouthwash · ergogenic aids

Abstract

Rinsing of carbohydrate in the oral cavity has been shown to improve performance especially in endurance type activities. The exact mechanism responsible for this ergogenic effect remains unestablished but it is speculated that related to carbohydrate receptors in oral cavity which increase neural drive. A randomised double-blind crossover counterbalanced study design was used to examine the effects of repeated carbohydrate mouth rinsing (%6.4 maltodextrine) on physically active female’s 30-s sprint power output on a cycle ergometer. Fifteen physically active female (age 20.87 ± 2 years) completed the following 10-second mouth rinse trials; a-) %6.4 carbohydrate solution (Cho) b-) water as a placebo (PLA). Repeated mouth rinsing was carried out with 8x25 ml doses of the flavour matched solutions at 30-s intervals during 5 minutes warm up. Immediately after the last rinsing, participants cycled 30-second maximal sprint on a cycle ergometer. Peak Power and Mean Power output were obtained via cycle ergometer software, blood glucose (BG), blood lactate (BL), heart rate (HR) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) at rest, immediately after test and several time points in active and passive recovery period were assessed. Compared with the PLA trials, Cho didn’t significantly increase peak and mean power output (P>0,05). As for RPE, BG, BL and HR parameters, there wasn’t statistical significance between trials though.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAYIGIT, R., YASLI, B. C., KARABIYIK, H., ERTETIK, G., KOZ, M., ERSOZ, G. (2017). Effect of Repeated Carbohydrate Mouth Rinsing on Female’s Sprint Power Output. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, Cilt 5 - Sayı 2, 102–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/768948

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ali A, Moss C, Yoo MJY, Wilkinson A, Breier B (2017). Effect of Mouth Rinse and Ingestion of Carbohydrate Solutions on Mood and Perceptual Responses Durin Exercise. 14: Aras D, Arslan E, Atlı A, Şahin FN (2016). Menstrual Döngünün Fazlarına Göre Sedanter Kadınlarda Anaerobik Güç Değerlerinin İncelenmesi, Spormetre., 14:191-198.
  2. Beelen M, Beghuis J, Bonaparte B, Ballak SB, Jeukendrup AE, Van Loon LJC (2009). Carbohydrate mouth rinsing in the fed state: lack of enhancement of time-trial performance, International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 19:400–409.
  3. Bortolotti H, Pereira LA, Oliveira RS, Cyrino ES, Altimari LR (2013). Carbohydrate mouth rinse does not improve repeated sprint performance. Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry, 15:639-645.
  4. Burke LM, M RJ (2015). The Governor has a sweet tooth- Mouth sensing of nutrients to enhance sports performance, European Journal of Sport Science., 15:29-40.
  5. Chambers ES, Bridge MW, Jones DA (2009). Carbohydrate sensing in the human mouth: effects on exercise performance and brain activity. Journal of Physiology, 587:1779-1794.
  6. Chong E, Guelfi KJ, Fournier PA (2011). Effect of a Carbohydrate mouth rinse on maximal sprint performance in competitive male cyclist, Journal of Sport Science and Medicine in Sport, 14:162-167.
  7. Chong E, Guelfi KJ, Fournier PA (2014). Combined Glucose Ingestion and Mouth Rinsing Improves Sprint Cycling Performance. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 24:605-612.
  8. Coyle EF, Coggan AR, Hemmert MK,et al. (1986). Muscle glycogen utilization during prolonged strenuous exercise when fed carbohydrate, J Appl Physiol., 61:165–72.
  9. Dorling JL, Ernest CP (2013). Effect of carbohydrate mouth rinsing on multiple sprint performance. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 10:41-49.
  10. Gant N, Stinear CM, Byblow WD (2010). Carbohydrate in the mouth immediately facilitates motor output, Brain Research, 1350:151–158.
  11. Hopkins WG, Schabort EJ, Hawley JA (2001). Reliability of power in physical performance tests, Sports Medicine, 31:211-234.
  12. Inbar O, Bar-Or O, Skinner JS. (1996).
  13. The wingate anaerobic test, Champaign:Human Kinetics. Pp 1-95.
  14. James RM, Sarah R, Rollo I, James LJ. (2017). No Dose Response Effect of Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse on Cycling Time-Trial Performance. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 26:25-31.
  15. Jensen M, Stellingwerff T, Klimstra M. (2015). Carbohdyrate Mouth Rinse Couters Fatigue Related Strength