Journals / International Journal of Sport Culture and Science / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Investigating the Anthropometric Variables and Bio-Motoric Properties in Male and Female Swimmers

Pages
274–284
Publication Date
2017-12-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that there was no significant differences between groups for age, height, weight, skinfold thicknesses and ∑8 skinfolds (p>0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to investigate the anthropometric features, and some bio-motoric properties in young male and female swimmers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Eighteen male and seventeen female amateur swimmers (mean age = 13.4 ± 2.9 and 12.7 ± 2.2 years respectively) volunteered to participate in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that there was no significant differences between groups for age, height, weight, skinfold thicknesses and ∑8 skinfolds (p>0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Swimming · amateur athletes · gender

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the anthropometric features, and some bio-motoric properties in young male and female swimmers. Furthermore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between anthropometric and bio-motoric variables considering the gender differences. Eighteen male and seventeen female amateur swimmers (mean age = 13.4 ± 2.9 and 12.7 ± 2.2 years respectively) volunteered to participate in this study. All swimmers were member of the same team who had trained at least for 3 days in a week. The anthropometric features were evaluated by height, weight, skinfold thicknesses (triceps, biceps, pectoral chest, midaxillary, abdominal, subscapular, midthigh, suprailium, supraspinale, and calf skinfold thicknesses), breadth, and girth measurements, and body fat. The bio-motoric variables were limited with flexibility, squat jump (SJ), counter movement jump (CMJ), and handgrip strength. The results showed that there was no significant differences between groups for age, height, weight, skinfold thicknesses and ∑8 skinfolds (p>0.05). However, there was a significant difference between groups for body fat (p<0.01), humerus and femur breadth values (p<0.01), and for waist girth values (p<0.05). There was significant differences between male and female swimmers for investigated bio-motoric properties. The results showed that the SJ and CMJ values were significantly related with height, weight, breadth, and girth measurements (p<0.01) in male swimmers. On the other hand, no such relationship was found in female swimmers. In conclusion, present study indicated that there were significant differences between genders, with favor results for male swimmers. The determination of anthropometric properties may help the trainers to predict and follow the swimmers’ performance.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOKUMACI, B., AYGÜN, C., DOĞAN, D. D., ATABEK, H. Ç. (2017). Investigating the Anthropometric Variables and Bio-Motoric Properties in Male and Female Swimmers. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 274–284. https://ajindex.com/articles/768914

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ayan V, Kavi N (2016). “The study of the somatotypes and the horizontal jump performance characteristics of the female swimmers aged between 8 and 14.” International Journal of Science Culture and Sport (IntJSCS), 4(special issue 1): 23-30.
  2. Bencke J, Damsgaard R, Saekmose A, Jørgensen P, Jørgensen K, Klausen K (2002). “Anaerobic power and muscle strength characteristics of 11 years old elite and non-elite boys and girls from gymnastics, team handball, tennis and swimming.” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 12(3):171-178.
  3. Benjanuvatra N, Edmunds K, Blanksby B (2007). "Jumping abilities and swimming grab-start performances in elite and recreational swimmers." International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education, 1(3): 231-241.
  4. Bosco C, Tsarpela O, Foti C, Cardinale M, Tihanyi J, Bonifazi M, Viru M, Viru, A. (2002). "Mechanical behaviour of leg extensor muscles in male and female sprinters." Biology of Sport, 19(3): 189-202.
  5. Busko K, Gajewski J (2011). "Muscle strength and power of elite female and male swimmers." Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity, 3(1): 13-18
  6. Cicchella A, Jidong L, Jürimäe T, Zini M, Passariello C, Rizzo L, Stefanelli C (2009). "Anthropometric comparison between young Estonian and Chinese swimmers." Journal of Human Sport and Exercise online, 4(2): 154-160.
  7. Çelebi Ş (2008). "We investigate body structural and functional properties in 9-13 year children who takes swimming training [Yüzme antrenmanı yaptırılan 9-13 yaş grubu ilköğretim öğrencilerinde vücut yapısal ve fonksiyonel özelliklerinin incelenmesi]" Master Thesis, Health Sciences Institute, Physical Education and Sports Department, Erciyes University, Kayseri. Eston R, Reilly T (Eds.) (2009). "Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology laboratory manual: tests, procedures and data." Volume 1: Anthropometry, USA and Canada, Routledge. Fagnani F, Giombini A, Di Cesare A, Pigozzi F, Di Salvo V (2006). "The effects of a whole-body vibration program on muscle performance and flexibility in female athletes." American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(12): 956-962.
  8. Geladas ND, Nassis GP, Pavlicevic S (2005). "Somatic and physical traits affecting sprint swimming performance in young swimmers." International Journal of Sports Medicine, 26(2): 139-144.
  9. Guzman RJ (2007).
  10. The Swimming Drill Book, Human Kinetics. Knechtle B, Baumann B, Knechtle P, Rosemann T (2010). "Speed during training and anthropometric measures in relation to race performa