Journals / International Journal of Sport Culture and Science / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Gender Roles of Turkish College Level Futsal Players

Pages
492–498
Publication Date
2018-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of the present study was to compare the gender role among college level male

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the present study was to compare the gender role among college level male
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of the present study was to compare the gender role among college level male
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of the present study was to compare the gender role among college level male
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bem sex role inventory · femininity · masculinity

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to compare the gender role among college level male

🔖

Cite This Article

GENÇAY, Ö. A., GENÇAY, S., AVNİOĞLU, S., GÜR, Y., GENÇAY, E. (2018). Gender Roles of Turkish College Level Futsal Players. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 492–498. https://ajindex.com/articles/768866

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Andre, T., and Holland, A. (1995). Relationship of sport participation to sex role orientation and attitudes toward women among high school males and females. Journal of Sport Behavior, 18(4). Bem, S. L. (1974). The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155–162. doi: 10.1037/h0036215 Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364.
  2. Chalabaev, A., Sarrazin, P. G., Fontay ne, P., Boich, J., and Clément -Guillotin, C. (2013). The influence of sex stereotypes and gender roles on participation and performance in sport and exercise: Review and future d irections. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(2), 136–144. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.10.005 Clément-Guillotin, C., and Fontayne, P. (2011). Situational Malleability of Gender Schema: The Case of the Competitive Sport Context. Sex Roles, 64(5–6), 426–439. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9912-1
  3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. L. Erlbaum Associates. doi: 10.1234/12345678 Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. doi: 10.1007/BF02310555 Cronbach, L. J., and Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in Psychological test. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302. doi: 10.1037/h0040957 Dökmen, Z. Y. (1999). Bem cinsiyet rolü envanteri kadınsılık ve erkeksilik ölçekler i Türkçe formunun psikometrik özellikleri. Kriz Dergisi, 7(1), 27–40.
  4. Edwards, S. W., Gordin, R. D., and Henschen, K. P. (1984). Sex-role Orientations of Female NCAA Championship Gymnasts. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 625–626.
  5. Harrison, L. a., and Lynch, A. B. (2005). Social Role Theory and the Perceived Gender Role Orientation of Athletes. Sex Roles, 52(February), 227–236. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-1297-1
  6. Khayat, B., Shojai, M., and Daneshfar, A. (2013). Sex role among elite male and female futsal players. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 3(2), 520–523.
  7. Kızılaslan, İ., and Diktaş, Ö. (2011). The Role of University Education in Changin g the Gender Role Perceptions of Turkish ELT Student Teachers. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 510–525.
  8. Koivula, N. (1995). Ratings of gender appropriateness of sports participation: Effects of gender-based schematic processing. Sex Roles, 33(7–8), 543–557. doi: 10.1007/BF01544679 Lantz, C. D., and Schroeder, P.