SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Sport Culture and Science / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

The Analysis of Athletes Levels of Coronavirus-19 Phobia

Mehmet YILDIRIM
Oktay ÇOBAN
Erol BAYKAN
Oğuz GÜRKAN
Pages
104–116
Publication Date
2021-03-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In terms of various variables such as sports branch (individual or team), age, history of coronavirus case in an acquaintance, monthly income from the sports branch, measures taken by managers in sports facilities and other people’s personal hygiene during the past/future trainings, statistically significant differences were found among participants’ mean total coronavirus phobia scale scores (p0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study aims to analyze athletes’ levels of coronavirus phobia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the present study consists of 156 individual and 62 team athletes in different sports branches in Yozgat province of Turkey during the season 2019-2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In terms of various variables such as sports branch (individual or team), age, history of coronavirus case in an acquaintance, monthly income from the sports branch, measures taken by managers in sports facilities and other people’s personal hygiene during the past/future trainings, statistically significant differences were found among participants’ mean total coronavirus phobia scale scores (p0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019-2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Coronavirus · Sports · Athlete

Abstract

The present study aims to analyze athletes’ levels of coronavirus phobia. The sample of the present study consists of 156 individual and 62 team athletes in different sports branches in Yozgat province of Turkey during the season 2019-2020. Athletes’ demographic features were obtained using a “personal information form”. Athletes’ levels of coronavirus phobia were measured using Coronavirus-19 phobia scale developed by Arpacı, Karataş and Baloğlu (2020). The statistical analysis of the obtained data was performed using SPSS 18 package program. In addition, normality test, frequency analysis, percentage analysis, arithmetic means, T test, ANOVA analysis and post hoc tests were used. The data analysis demonstrated the mean scale test score was 50.03. In terms of various variables such as sports branch (individual or team), age, history of coronavirus case in an acquaintance, monthly income from the sports branch, measures taken by managers in sports facilities and other people’s personal hygiene during the past/future trainings, statistically significant differences were found among participants’ mean total coronavirus phobia scale scores (p0.05).

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, M., ÇOBAN, O., BAYKAN, E., GÜRKAN, O. (2021). The Analysis of Athletes Levels of Coronavirus-19 Phobia. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 104–116. https://ajindex.com/articles/768805

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Acar K, Mor A, Baynaz K, Arslanoğlu E. (2020). An investigation on anxiety states of students in faculty of sport sciences during COVID-19. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences, 3(1): 66-73.
  2. Arapacı İ, Karataş K, Baloğlu M. (2020). The development and initial tests for the psychometric properties of the COVID-19 Phobia Scale (C19P-S), Personality and Individual Differences, 164, 1-6.
  3. Aslan, R. (2020). COVID-19 fizyoloji ve psikolojiyi nasıl etkiliyor. Göller Bölgesi Aylık Ekonomi ve Kültür Dergisi Ayrıntı, 8(88):47-53. Aygün M, Murathan T. (2020). Buz hokeyinin tarihsel süreç içerisindeki görünümü. Journal of History School, 44, 600-612.
  4. Aygün M, Ünal M. (2020). COVID-19 Pandemisinin buz hokeyi sporuna etkisi. Anadolu Kliniği Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, 25 (Speciak Issue on COVID-19), 195-203.
  5. Bandelow B, Michaelis S. (2015) Epidemiology of anxiety disorders in the 21st century. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 17(3): 327-335.
  6. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessly S, Greenberg H, Rubin GJ. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet, 395(10227):912-920.
  7. Burtscher J, Burtscher M, Millet GP. (2020). (Indoor) Isolation, stress and physical inactivity: vicious circles accelerated by COVID-19? Scand J Med Sci Sports, May 6, 10.1111/sms.13706. Chen P, Mao L, Nassis GP, Harmer P, Ainsworth EB, Li F. (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): The need to maintain regular physicalactivity while taking precautions. J Sport Health Sci. 9(2):103-104.
  8. Dores H, Cardim N. (2020). Return to play after COVID-19: a sport cardiologist’s view. Br J Sports Med Published, 1-2.
  9. Grant WB, Lahore H, McDonnell SL, et al. (2020) Evidence that vitamin d supplementation could reduce risk of influenza and COVID-19 infections and deaths. Nutrients, 12(4):988. Hull JH. Loosemore M, Schwellnus M. (2020) Respiratory health in athletes: facing the COVID-19 challenge. Lancet Respir Me, 2600(20)30175-2.
  10. Keskin A, Ünlüoglu I, Bilge U, Yenilmez Ç. (2013). The prevalence of psychiatric disorders distribution of subjects gender and its relationship with psychiatric help-seeking. Noro-Psikyatri Arsivi, 50(4): 344-351.
  11. Kıroğlu F. (2020). COVID-19 Pandemi ortamında çalışma koşulları ve genel sorunlar. Meyad Akademi Dergisi, 1(1): 9-90.
  12. Kline RB. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling: Methodology In The Social Sciences. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  13. Kwok KO, Li KK, Chan