Journals / International Journal of Sport Culture and Science / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of Psychological Resilience Levels of Boxing Sports

Pages
79–90
Publication Date
2021-03-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of physical education a significant difference between the groups with the comparison variable depending on the age of the teachers was not significant (p> 0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study; the resilience level of the athletes in the sport of boxing club based in Istanbul, is to examine several variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study of 166 women, 149 men, and 315 athletes participated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of physical education a significant difference between the groups with the comparison variable depending on the age of the teachers was not significant (p> 0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sports · Box · Psychology

Abstract

The aim of this study; the resilience level of the athletes in the sport of boxing club based in Istanbul, is to examine several variables. The study of 166 women, 149 men, and 315 athletes participated. To measure the resilience of the athletes in the study Block and Kremen (1996) developed; Karaırmak (2007) and adapted it into the Turkish by Ego Strength Scale are used. Research in Statistics; parametric tests for independent samples which causes the normal distribution of the data t-test and ANOVA was used (α = 0.05). According to research results; A significant difference between groups concerning gender comparisons was not significant (p> 0.05). According to the results of physical education a significant difference between the groups with the comparison variable depending on the age of the teachers was not significant (p> 0.05). However, the active sports life of athletes to express themselves in everyday situations and their status has been determined that the significant relationship between resilience levels (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİNLER, Y., ULUKAN, M. (2021). Investigation of Psychological Resilience Levels of Boxing Sports. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 79–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/768803

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Atik, E. L. (2013). Liseli ergenlerde bağlanma stilleri ve psikolojik sağlamlık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkide öz-yansıtma ve içgörünün rolü [The Role of Self-reflection and İnsight in the Rrelationship between High School Adolescents Attachment Styles and Psychological Resilience Degree]. Master Thesis. İstanbul Science University, Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.
  2. Campo del G. D., Vollora, S. G. & Lopez, L. M. G. (2011). Differences in Decision-Making Development between Expert and Novice Invasion Game Players. Percept Motor Skill, 112(3), 871-888. https://doi.org/10.2466/05.10.11.25.PMS.112.3.871-888
  3. Connor, K. M. & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113
  4. Çelik, O.B. (2018). Elit sporcuların ve sedanter bireylerin psikolojik dayanıklılık profilleri [Psychological resilience profiles of elite athletes and sedentary individuals]. Ph.D. Thesis. Gazi University Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
  5. Desai, R.B. (2017). Psychological hardiness among college students. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(3), 80-84.
  6. Embury, S. P. (2010). Introduction to the special issue: Assessing Resiliency in children and adolescents, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28(4), 287-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282910366830
  7. Erim, V. & Küçük H. (2017). Farklı Kategorideki Kadın Milli Boksörlerin Psikolojik Dayanıklılıklarının Karşılaştırılması [ A Comparison of Psychological Resilience of Female National Boxes in Different Categories]. The Journal of Kastamonu Education, 25(1), 147 - 154. Fraser, M. W.; Richman, J. M. & Galinsky, M. J. (1999). Risk, protection and resilience: toward a conceptual framework for social work practice. Social Work Research, 23, 129-208.
  8. Gizir, C. A. (2004). A literature review of students on resilience, risk and protective factors. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal 3(28). Gooding, P.A., Hurst, A., Johnson, J. & Tarrier, N. (2012). Psychological resilience in young and older adults. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 27(3), 262–270. Grgurinović, T. & Sindik, J. (2015). Application of the mental toughness/hardiness scale on the sample of athletes engaged in different types of sports. Physical Culture, 69(2),77-87.
  9. Hickey, G & Fricker, P. (1999). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, CNS stimulants and sport. Sports Med., 27(1): 11-21. http